Transforming learning support: An online resource centre for a diverse student population;Transformation d’un support d’enseignement: Un centre de ressources en ligne pour une population variée d’étudiants;Veränderte lernhilfen: Ein online resource centre für unterschiedliche studentengruppen

Educational Media International

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 15-32

  Clerehan, Rosemary ^a   Turnbull, Jill ^a   Moore, Tim ^a   Brown, Alanna ^a   Tuovinen, Juhani ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011585713     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952398032000092099     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. [Line 341]Alexander, S (1999) An evaluation of innovative projects involving communication and information technology, Higher Education Research and Development, 18, 2, 173-184.
2. Anderson, T (2002) An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction, IT Forum Paper #63. Available online: http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper63/paper63.htm (accessed 1 October 2002).
3. Bakhtin, MM (1986). In Emerson, C and Holquist, M (eds) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
4. Ballard, B and Clanchy, J (1988) Literacy in the university: an anthropological approach. In Taylor, G, Ballard, B, Beasley, V, Bock, H, Clanchy, J and Nightingale, P (eds) Literacy by Degrees, SRHE and Open University Press, Milton Keynes. pp. 7-23.
5. Bannon, B and Milheim, W (1997) Existing web-based instruction courses and their design. In Khan, B (ed.) Web-Based Instruction, Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey.
6. Berkenkotter, C and Huckin, T (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
7. Bode, J (2001) Helping students to improve their writing skills. In Canyon, DV, McGinty, S and Dixon, D (eds) Tertiary Teaching: Flexible Teaching and Learning Across the Disciplines, Craftsmen Products Pty Ltd, Sydney. Available online: http://www.craftsmenproducts.com/gett01/ (accessed 9 October 2002).
8. Brinton, D, Snow, M and Wesche, M (1989) Content-based Second Language Instruction, Heinle, Boston.
9. [Line 556]Burston, J (1989) Towards better tutorial CALL: a matter of intelligent control, CALICO Journal, 6, 4, 75-89.
10. Candlin, C (1998) Researching writing in the academy In Candlin, C, Gollin, S, Plum, G, Spinks, S and Stuart-Smith, V (eds) Researching Academic Literacies, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW.
11. [Line 616]Chanock, K (2000) Comments on essays: do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 1, 95-105.
12. [Line 645]Clerehan, R (2003) Transition to tertiary education in the arts and humanities: some academic initiatives from Australia, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2, 1, 72-89.
13. Evensen, LS (1996) The hidden curriculum of technology for academic writing: towards a research agenda. In Ventola, E and Mauranen, A (eds) Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
14. Franklin, S and Peat, M (1998) Online learning: the first year Biology way. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE 1998 Conference. Available at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/wollongong98/ (accessed 9 October 2002).
15. Gibbs, G (1992) Independent learning with more students, Booklet No. 5 in Teaching More Students Project, The Polytechnics and Colleges Funding Council/HMSO, London.
16. Hammond, N (1993) Learning with hypertext: problems, principles and prospects. In McKnight, C, Dillon A and Richardson J (eds) Hypertext: A Psychological Perspective, Ellis Horwood, New York.
17. [Line 780]Henderson, L (1996) Instructional design of interactive multimedia: a cultural critique, Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 4, 85-104.
18. Johns, T (1991a) From printout to handout: grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In Johns, T and King, P (eds) Classroom Concordancing, English Language Research Journal, 4, Birmingham University, Birmingham, pp. 27-45.
19. Johns, T (1991b) Should you be persuaded: two samples of data-driven learning materials. In Johns, T and King, P (eds) Classroom Concordancing, English Language Research Journal, 4. Birmingham University, Birmingham, pp. 1-13.
20. Jonassen, D, Mayes, T and McAleese, R (1993) A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education. In Duffy TM, Lowyck, J and Jonassen, D (eds) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
21. Jones, K, Turner, J and Street, B (1999) Students Writing in the University: Cultural and Epistemological Issues, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
22. Laurillard, D (1993) Rethinking University Teaching, Routledge, London.
23. Lave, J and Wenger, E (1991) Situated Learning: Intimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Lea, M (1999) Academic literacies and learning in higher education. In Jones, C, Turner, J and Street, B (eds) Students Writing in the University. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
25. Lea, MR and Street, BV (2000; Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach. In. Lea, MR and Stierer B (eds) Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts, SRHE & Open University Press, Buckingham.
26. McInnis, C, James, R and Hartley, R (2000) Trends in the First-Year Experience, AGPS, Canberra.
27. Nielsen, J (2000) Why you only need to test with 5 users. Available online: http://www.uscit.com/alertbox/20000319.html (accessed 1 October 2002).
28. Ramsden, P (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, London.
29. Sears, A, Jacko, J and Borella, M (1997) Internet delay effects: how users perceive quality, organization, and ease of use of information. CHI 97 Electronic Publications: Late Breaking/Short Talks. Available online: http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/short-talk/als2.htm (accessed 1 October 2002).
30. Sims, R (2001) From art to alchemy: achieving success with online learning. Available online: http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper55/paper55.htm (accessed 9 October 2002).
31. [Line 1138]Spiro, RJ, Feltovitch, PJ, Jacobson, MJ and Coulson, RL (1991) Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 25-33.
32. Swales, J (1986) A genre-based approach to language across the curriculum. In Tickoo, ML (ed.) Language Across the Curriculum, SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, Singapore, pp. 10-22.
33. [Line 1201]Thomas, P, Carswell, L, Price, B and Petre, M (1998) A holistic approach to supporting distance learning using the Internet: transformation, not translation, British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 2, 149-161.
34. Trimble, L (1985) English for Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Tuovinen, J (2001) Cognition research basis for instructional multimedia. In. Rahman, SM (ed.) Design and Management of Multimedia Information Systems, Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp. 323-335.
36. [Line 1286]Turnbull, J (1998) Towards independent concordance work for students: lessons from a case study, ON-CALL, 12, 2, 10-21.
37. Vygotsky, L (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. [Line 1336]Weges, HG and Portier, SJ (1997) Demand driven education through the delivery of interactive learning materials within the domain of Environmental Law: design and research findings, Distance Education, 18, 1, 77-92.
39. Willis, J, Shortall, T and Johns, TF (1995) Pedagogic Grammar, Birmingham University, Birmingham.