Strategies for integrating personalized medicine into healthcare practice

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 141-152

  Pritchard, Daryl E ^a   Moeckel, Franziska ^b   Villa, Mary Susan ^c   Housman, Laura T ^d,e   McCarty, Catherine A ^f   McLeod, Howard L ^g  

^a Personalized Medicine Coalition   (United States)

^b BETTY AND GUY BEATTY CENTER FOR INTEGRATED RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d US Corporate Office   (United States)

^e Access Solutions Consulting   (United States)

^f ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH   (United States)

^g H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

access to care; clinical adoption; information management; integration into healthcare; patient empowerment; personalized medicine education; value determination

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; EDUCATION; EMPOWERMENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; INTERVIEW; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; REVIEW; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRECISION MEDICINE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85011573617     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/pme-2016-0064     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. The Personalized Medicine Coalition. The basics (2016). www. personalizedmedicinecoalition. org
2. The Personalized Medicine Coalition. The case for personalized medicine (2014). www. personalizedmedicinecoalition. org
3. Novartis Oncology. The precision oncology annual trend report: perspectives from payers, oncologists, and pathologists (2016). www. hcp. novartis. com/care-management
4. Oxford Economics. Healthcare gets personal (2016). https://dam. sap. com/mac/preview
5. NextGxDx. The current landscape of genetic testing (2016). www. nextgxdx. com/insights
6. The Personalized Medicine Coalition. 2015 progress report: personalized medicine at FDA (2016). www. personalizedmedicinecoalition. org
7. The Personalized Medicine Coalition, PhRMA. Biopharmaceutical companies' personalized medicine research yields innovative treatments for patients (2015). www. personalizedmedicinecoalition. org
8. Aspinall MG, Hamermesh RG. Realizing the promise of personalized medicine. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(10), 108-117 (2007).
9. Evans JP, Meslin EM, Marteau TM, Caufield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science 331(6019), 861-862 (2011).
10. ScienceDaily. Personalized medicine: moving forward slowly but surely (2008). www. sciencedaily. com/releases
11. Miller AM, Garfield S, Woodman RC. Patient and provider readiness for personalized medicine. Pers. Med. Oncol. 5(4), 158-167 (2016).
12. Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: The future is here. Genet. Med. 15(4), 258-267 (2013).
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Public Health Genomics. About EGAPP (2013). www. egappreviews. org/about. htm
14. National Human Genome Research Institute. Implementing Genomics in Practice (IGNITE) (2016). www. genome. gov/27554264
15. National Human Genome Research Institute. Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (EMERGE) network (2016). www. genome. gov/27540473
16. Institute of Medicine (US). Integrating large-scale genomic information into clinical practice: workshop summary. National Academies Press, Washington, USA (2012). www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/books/NBK91500
17. Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD et al. ClinGen-the clinical genome resource. N. Engl. J. Med. 372(23), 2235-2242 (2015).
18. Roundtable on Translating Genomic-Based Research for Health; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Institute of Medicine. Genomics-Enabled Learning Health Care Systems: Gathering and Using Genomic Information to Improve Patient Care and Research: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press, WA, DC, USA (2015).
19. Horgan D, Jansen M, Leyens L et al. An index of barriers for the implementation of personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics in Europe. Public Health Genomics 17, 287-298 (2014).
20. PharmGKB. CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (2016). www. pharmgkb. org/page/cpic
21. PR Newswire. Survey: most healthcare organizations unprepared for precision medicine (2016). www. prnewswire. com/news-releases
22. Health Data Management. Many healthcare organizations not preparing for precision medicine (2016). www. healthdatamanagement. com
23. Horgan D, Jansen M, Leyens L et al. An index of barriers for the implementation of personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics in Europe. Public Health Genomics 17, 287-298 (2014).
24. Duke University School of Medicine. Applied genomics and precision medicine (2014). https://precisionmedicine. duke. edu
25. Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative. Understanding genetics (2016). https://cpmc. coriell. org/genetic-education/overview
26. American Nurses Association. Personalized medicine (2016). www. nursingworld. org/genetics
27. National Human Genome Research Institute. Education (2016). www. genome. gov/education/
28. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine. Genomics in patient care (2016). http://mayoresearch. mayo. edu
29. Personalized Medicine Coalition. Education (2016). www. personalizedmedicinecoalition. org
30. Garrison NA, Sathe NA, Antommaria AHM et al. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States. Genet. Med. 18, 663-671 (2016).
31. Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Domchek S. Multiplex genetic testing: reconsidering utility and informed consent in the era of next-generation sequencing. Genet. Med. 17, 97-98 (2015).
32. Lorell BH, Mikita JS, Anderson A, Hallinan ZP, Forrest A. Informed consent in clinical research: consensus recommendations for reform identified by an expert interview panel. Clin. Trials 12(6), 692-695 (2015).
33. GenomeWeb. NIH pumps $15M Into studies on effects of genomics information (2016). www. genomeweb. com
34. Inova Translational Medicine Institute. MediMap PGx testing at Inova (2016). www. inova. org/itmi/medimap
35. BusinessWire. Cigna builds on three years of success, expands genetic counseling program (2015). www. businesswire. com/news/home
36. Fowler FJ Jr, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions. Health Aff. 30(4), 699-706 (2011).
37. LaRose R, Gregg JL, Strover S, Straubhaar J, Carpenter S. Closing the rural broadband gap: promoting adoption of the internet in rural America. Telecommun. Policy 31, 359-373 (2007).
38. Sandefer RH, Marc DT, Kleeberg P. Meaningful use attestations among US hospitals: The growing rural-urban divide. Perspect. Health Inf. Manag. 12, f1 (2015).
39. Nishi A, Milner DA, Giovannucci EL et al. Integration of molecular pathology, epidemiology and social science for global precision medicine. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 16(1), 11-23 (2016).