Lessons from everyday lives: A moral justification for acute care research

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1146-1151

  McRae, Andrew D ^a   Weijer, Charles ^a  

^a Department of Bioethics ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Critical care; Emergency research; Ethics; Minimal risk; Nontherapeutic intervention

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0036250191     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200205000-00032     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Informed consent in emergency research: Consensus statement from the Coalition Conference of Acute Resuscitation and Critical Care Researchers
2. Research in emergency situations: The role of deferred consent
3. Task Force 3: Special aspects of research conduct in the emergency setting: Waiver of informed consent
4. Waiver of consent for emergency research
5. Thinking clearly about research risk: Implications of the work of Benjamin Freedman
6. Deferred consent: A new approach for resuscitation research on comatose patients
7. Philosophical, ethical and legal aspects of resuscitation medicine. I: Deferred consent and justification of resuscitation research
8. Informed consent for clinical resuscitation research
9. Role of the institutional review board in emergency medical research
10. IRB review of a phase II randomized clinical trial involving incompetent patients suffering from severe closed head injury
11. The letter or the spirit: Consent for research in CPR
12. The controversy over emergency research: A review of the issues and suggestions for a resolution
13. Emergency medicine and the development of the Food and Drug Administration's final rule on informed consent and waiver of informed consent in emergency research circumstances
14. Deferring consent with incompetent patients in an intensive care unit
15. The ambiguities of deferred consent
16. Philosophical, ethical, and legal aspects of resuscitation medicine. III. Discussion
17. Informed consent: Legally effective and prospectively obtained: Office of Protection from Research Risks
18. Informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research
19. Initial experience using the Food and Drug Administration guidelines for emergency research without consent
20. An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent
21. Implementation of the Food and Drug Administration's final rule for waiver of informed consent in certain emergency circumstances
22. Research involving the vulnerable sick
23. Demarcating research and treatment: A systematic approach for the analysis of the ethics of clinical research
24. The ethical analysis of risk
25. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research
26. Taking blood from children causes no more than minimal harm
27. Proposed guidelines for the participation of persons with dementia as research subjects
28. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries
29. The enforcement of morals: Non-therapeutic research on children
30. Proxy consent in the experimentation situation
31. Experimentation in children: Sharing in sociality
32. Freedman on the rights of the voiceless
33. On the rights of the voiceless
34. Five red herrings and an issue: Response to McCormick
35. New perspectives on emergency room research
36. Research on critically ill and injured patients: Rules, reality, and ethics
37. In loco parentis: Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children