Mental health tribunals: rights drowning in un-‘Chartered’ health waters?

Australian Journal of Human Rights

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 181-208

  Carney, Terry ^a   Beaupert, Fleur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011499774     PISSN: 1323238X     EISSN: 2573573X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1323238X.2008.11910839     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, 213 UNTS 221 (operative 3 September 1953)
2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966), operative 23 March 1976; 13 August 1980 for Australia
3. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (1966), operative 3 January 1976; 10 March 1976 for Australia
4. United Nations Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care (1991)
5. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948), adopted by the General Assembly on 10 December 1948
6. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) (Vicorian Charter)
7. Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)
8. Guardianship and Administration Act 1993 (SA)
9. Guardianship and Administration Regulations 1995 (SA)
10. Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) (ACT Charter)
11. Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic) (MHA Vic)
12. Mental Health Act 1990 (NSW) (MHA NSW)
13. Mental Health Act 1993 (SA) (MHA SA)
14. Mental Health Act 1996 (Tas) (MHA Tas)
15. Mental Health Act 1996 (WA) (MHA WA)
16. Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) (MHA NSW)
17. Mental Health and Related Services Act (NT) (MHA NT)
18. Mental Health (Treatment and Care) Act 1994 (ACT) (MHA ACT)
19. Human Rights Act 1998
20. Mental Health Act 1983
21. Megyeri v Germany (1993) 15 EHRR 584 (European Court of Human Rights)
22. R (B) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWHC (Admin) 1533; [2003] Mental Health L Rep 19 (UK)
23. R (C) v London and South and West Region Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002]1 WLR 176; [2001] Mental Health L Rep 110 (UK)
24. R (KB and others) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWHC (Admin) 639; [2003] Mental Health L Rep 1 (UK)
25. ACT Department of Justice and Community Safety (ACT DJCS) (2007) Overview of the ACT Human Rights Act 2004 [Online] Available: [2007, February 7]
26. Adler M (1999) ‘Lay tribunal members and administrative justice’ (Winter) Public Law pp 616-25
27. Alston P (1995) ‘Disability and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ in T Degener and Y Koster-Dreese (eds) Human Rights and Disabled Persons: Essays and Relevant Human Rights Instruments Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
28. Appelbaum P (1997) ‘Almost a revolution: an international perspective on the law of involuntary commitment’ 25(2) Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law pp 135-47
29. Auditor-General of Victoria (2002) ‘Mental health services for people in crisis’ Auditor-General, Victoria
30. Beaupert F (2007) ‘Mental health tribunals and the therapeutic impact and limitations of legal representation: a need for continuing independent advocacy’, paper presented at the Third International Congress of Psychology and Law, Adelaide, 6 July
31. Beaupert F (2006) ‘Aspects of mental health tribunal processes that may impact on their “therapeutic” potential’, paper presented at the Third Therapeutic Jurisprudence Conference, Perth, 7-9 June
32. Bell K (1975) ‘Research study on supplementary benefit appeal tribunals: review of main findings; conclusions; recommendations’ HMSO
33. Bindman J, Maingay S and Szmukler G (2003) ‘The Human Rights Act and mental health legislation’ 182(2) British Journal of Psychiatry pp 91-94
34. Camey G (2005) Serious Mental Illness and a Human Right to Mental Health Care for Relapse Prevention?, Masters of International Law thesis, University of Sydney
35. Camey T, Tait D, Chappell D and Beaupert F (2007) ‘Mental health tribunals: “TJ” implications of weighing fairness, freedom, protection and treatment’ 17(1) Journal of Judicial Administration pp 46-59
36. Clayton R (2007) ‘The Human Rights Act six years on: where are we now?' European Human Rights Law Review pp 11-26
37. Coats J W (2004) ‘Mental health review tribunals and legal representation - equality of arms?' 28 Psychiatric Bulletin pp 426
38. Consultation Committee for a Proposed WA Human Rights Act (Consultation Committee WA) (2007) A WA Human Rights Act (2007) [Online] Available: [2008, April 17]
39. Consultative Council on Review of Mental Health Legislation (1981) Report of the Consultative Council on Review of Mental Health Legislation CCRHML
40. Davidson G, McCallion M and Potter M (2003) ‘Connecting mental health and human rights’ Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission
41. Dawson J (2005) ‘Community treatment orders: international comparisons’ Otago University Print
42. Dawson J (2003) ‘Judicial review of the meaning of “mental disorder”' 10(1) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law pp 164-70
43. Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmania (DHHS) (2007) ‘Review of the Mental Health Act 1996: a discussion paper’ DHHS
44. Dibben C, Wong ML and Hunt N (2005) ‘Mental health tribunals: an issue for clinical governance’ 10(4) Clinical Governance: An International Journal pp 300-03
45. Diesfeld K (2003) ‘Insights on “insight”: the impact of extra-legislative factors on decisions to discharge detained patients’ in K Diesfeld and I Freckelton (eds) Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Ashgate, Aldershot pp 359-82
46. Diesfeld K and McKenna B (2007) ‘The unintended impact of the therapeutic intentions of the New Zealand Mental Health Review Tribunal: therapeutic jurisprudence perspectives’ 14(4) Journal of Law and Medicine pp 566-74
47. Diesfeld K and McKenna B (2006) ‘The therapeutic intent of the New Zealand Mental Health Review Tribunal’ 13(1) Psychology, Psychiatry & Law pp 100-09
48. Diesfeld Kate and Sjostrom S (2006) ‘Interpretive flexibility: why doesn’t insight incite controversy in mental health law?' 25 Behavioural Sciences and the Law pp 85-101
49. du Fresne S (2003) ‘Therapeutic potential in review of involuntary detention’ in K Diesfeld and I Freckelton (eds) Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Ashgate, Aldershot pp 203-20
50. Evans S and Evans C (2006) ‘Legal redress under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities’ 17(4) Public Law Review pp 264-81
51. Fennell P (1999) ‘The third way in mental health policy: negative rights, positive rights and the convention’ 26(1) Journal of Law and Society pp 103-27
52. Freckelton I (2003a) ‘Involuntary detention decision-making criteria and hearing procedures: an opportunity for therapeutic jurisprudence in action’ in K Diesfeld and I Freckelton (eds) Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Ashgate, Aldershot pp 293-337
53. Freckelton I (2003b) ‘Mental health tribunal decisionmaking: a therapeutic jurisprudence lens’ 10(1) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law pp 44-62
54. Freiberg A (2002/03) ‘Therapeutic jurisprudence in Australia: paradigm shift or pragmatic incrementalism?' 20(2) Law in Context pp 6-23
55. Gledhill K (2007) ‘Human rights instruments and mental health law: the English experience of the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce pp 359-403
56. Costin L (2000) ‘Human rights of persons with mental disabilities: the European Convention of Human Rights’ 23(2) International Journal of Law and Psychiatry pp 125-59
57. Costin L and Gable L (2004) ‘The human rights of persons with mental disabilities: a global perspective on the application of human rights principles to mental health’ 63 Maryland Law Review pp 20-121
58. Grundell E (2005) ‘Psychiatrists’ perceptions of administrative review: a Victorian empirical study’ 12(1) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law pp 68-87
59. Indermaur D and Roberts L (2003) ‘Drug courts in Australia: the first generation’ 15 Current Issues in Criminal Justice pp 136-54
60. Intellectual Disability Review Panel (IDRP) (2007) ‘A right to be heard: 20 years of the intellectual disability review panel’ IDRP
61. Koutnatzis S (2005) ‘Social rights as a constitutional compromise: lessons from comparative experience’ 44 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law pp 74-133
62. Leggatt A (2001) Report of the Review of Trib11n11ls by Sir Andrew Leggatt: Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service [Online] Available:
63. Lesser J (2007) ‘Review and decision making for persons with a serious mental illness: achieving best practice’ Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia
64. Mahusky M, Reinert J and Belcher G (2002) ‘Therapeutic justice: our commitment process could stand a second look’ (June) Vermont Bar Journal pp 48-50
65. Mendelsohn O and Maher L (1994) ‘Introduction’ Law in Context (special issue) pp 1-8
66. Mental Health Council of Australia, Brain and Mind Research Institute & Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (MHCA) (2005) ‘Not for service - experiences of injustice and despair in mental health care in Australia’ MHCA
67. Mental Health Review Board of Victoria (MHRB Vic) (2006) Annual Report 2006 MHRB
68. Mental Health Review Board Western Australia (MHRB WA) (2006) Annual Report 2005 MHRB
69. Mental Health Review Tribunal of New South Wales (MHRT NSW) (2007) 2006 Annual Report MHRT
70. New South Wales Parliament (2007) Hansard, Legislative Assembly, Wednesday, 30 May
71. Pearson M (2004) ‘Representing the mentally ill: thecritical role of advocacy under the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic)' 29(4) Alternative Law Journal pp 174-77 and 196
72. Peay J (1989) Tribunals on Trial: A Study of Decision-making Under the Mental Health Act 1983 Clarendon Press, Oxford
73. Peay J (1982) ‘Mental health review tribunals and the Mental Health (Amendment) Act’ Criminal Law Review pp 794-808
74. Perkins E (2003a) Decision-Making in Mental Health Review Tribunals (2003) London: Policy Studies Institute
75. Perkins E (2003b) ‘Mental health review tribunals’ in K Diesfeld and I Freckelton (eds) Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Ashgate, Aldershot pp 221-39
76. Perkins E (2003c) ‘A new tribunal?' 10(1) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law pp 113-21
77. Perlin M (2000) The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial American Psychological Association, Washington DC
78. Prior P (2007) ‘Mentally disordered offenders and the European Court of Human Rights’ 30(6) International Journal of Law and Psychiatry pp 546-57
79. Rees N (2003) ‘International human rights and mental health review tribunals obligations’ 10(1) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law pp 33-43
80. Richardson G (2003) ‘Involuntary treatment: searching for principles’ in K Diesfeld and I Freckelton (eds) Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Ashgate, Aldershot pp 55-73
81. Richardson G and Genn H (2007) ‘Tribunals in transition: resolution or adjudication?' (Spring) Public Law pp 116-41
82. Richardson G and Machin D (2000a) ‘Doctors on tribunals: a confusion of roles’ 176 British Journal of Psychiatry pp 110-15
83. Richardson G and Machin D (2000b) ‘Judicial review and tribunal decision making: a study of the Mental Health Review Tribunal’ (v) Public Law pp 494-514
84. Rolfe T (2001) ‘Community treatment orders: a review’ Office of the Chief Psychiatrist
85. Rosenthal E and Sundram C (2004) ‘The role of international human rights in national mental health legislation’ WHO
86. Sadurski W (2002) ‘Enduring and empowering: the Bill of Rights in the third millennium: postcommunist charters of rights in Europe and the US Bill of Rights’ 65 Law & Contemporary Problems pp 223-50
87. Steiner H and Alston P (2000) International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals (2nd edn) Oxford University Press, Oxford
88. Swain P (2000) ‘Admitted and detained: community members and mental health review boards’ 7(1) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law pp 79-88
89. Tasmania Law Reform Institute (TLRI) (2007) ‘A Charter of Rights for Tasmania’, Report No 10
90. Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC) (2007) The Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Explained (2007) VEOHRC [Online] Available: [2007, November 8]
91. Vine R (2007) ‘Review boards in a mainstreamed environment: a toothless tiger in a bedless desert?', paper presented at the 30th Congress of the International Academy of Law and Mental Health, Padua, Italy, June
92. Wagle N, Levy F and Allbright A (2002) ‘Outpatient civil commitment laws: an overview’ 26 Mental and Physical Disability Reporter pp 179-81
93. Wales H and Hiday V (2006) ‘PLC or TLC: is outpatient commitment the/an answer?' 29(6) International Journal of Law and Psychiatry pp 451-68
94. Wallach S (2000) ‘Resource constraints and the right of the mentally disordered to receive appropriate treatment’ 31(3) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review pp 525-50
95. Watchirs H (2000) ‘Application of rights analysis instrument to Australian mental health legislation’ Department of Health and Aged Care
96. Watchirs H and Heesom G (1996) ‘Report on a rights analysis instrument for use in evaluating mental health legislation’ Human Rights Branch, Attorney-General’s Department
97. World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) The Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation (2005) WHO, Geneva
98. Wikely N (2000) ‘Burying Bell: managing the judicialisation of social security tribunals’ 63(4) Modern Law Review pp 457-501
99. Williams G (2006) ‘The Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities: origins and scope’ 30(3) Melbourne University Law Review pp 880-905
100. Winick B (2005) Civil Commitment: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Model Carolina Academic Press, Durham, North Carolina
101. Winick B (2003) ‘A therapeutic jurisprudence model for civil commitment’ in K Diesfeld and l Freckelton (eds) Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Ashgate, Aldershot pp 23-54