Mental health review tribunal decision-making: A therapeutic jurisprudence lens

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 44-62

  Freckelton, Ian ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6444236773     PISSN: 13218719     EISSN: 19341687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/pplt.2003.10.1.44     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Blaauw, E., Hoeve, M., Van Marle, H., Sheridan, L., (2002). International perspectives on how to deal with mentally irresponsible offenders. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Brent, D.A., Perper, J.A., Goldstein, C.E., Kolko, D.J., Allan, M.J., Allman, C.J. ‖ Zelenak, J.P., (1988). Risk factors for adolescent suicide: a comparison of adolescent suicide victims with suicidal in-patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 215–219.
3. Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1936) 60 CLR 336.
4. Brookbanks, W.I., (2002). Compelling civil commitment and consent to treatment. A workable tension. Butterworths Family, Law Journal of New Zealand, September, 72–77.
5. Cope, R., (1993). A survey of forensic psychiatrists’ views on psychopathic disorder. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 15(3), 343.
6. Council on Tribunals, (1983). Annual Report of the Council on Tribunals 1982–1983. London: HMSO.
7. Diesfeld, K. ‖ Freckelton, I. (Eds.). (2003). Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence: International perspectives on civil commitment. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
8. Diesfeld, K., (2003). Unpacking the concept of insight. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10, 63–70.
9. Du Fresne, S. (2003). Therapeutic potential in review of involuntary detention. In K. Diesfeld ‖ I. Freckelton, Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence: International perspectives on civil commitment. Dartmouth: Ashgate. EO v Mental Health Review Board [2000] WASC 203.
10. Freckelton, I. (2001). Civil commitment: Due process, procedural fairness and the quality of decision-making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8, 105–117.
11. Freckelton, I., (1998). Decision-making about involuntary psychiatric treatment: An analysis of the principles behind Victorian practice. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5, 249–264.
12. Goodwin, F.D. ‖ Jamison K.R., (1990). Manic depressive illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Gostin, L. ‖ Fennell, P., (1992). Mental health: Tribunal procedure (2nd ed.), London: Longman.
14. Grant, I., Ogloff, I.R.P., ‖ Douglas K.S., (2000). The British Columbia review panel. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 173–194.
15. Gunn I. ‖ Taylor P. (1993). Forensic psychiatry: Clinical, legal and ethical issues. Boston: ButterworthHeinemann.
16. Higgenbottam, J., Ledwidge, B., Paredes, J., Hansen, M., Kogan, C., ‖ Lambert, L.A., (1985). Variables affecting the decision making of a review panel. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 30, 577–581.
17. Harry V Mental Health Review Tribunal (1994) 33 NSWLR 315.
18. Hummer, M., ‖ Fleishacker, W.W. (2000). Management strategies for patients who show poor compliance. In S.R. Marder (Ed.), Switching anti psychotic medication (pp. 21–28). London: Science Press.
19. Jackson, C. ‖ Birchwood, M., (1996). Early intervention in psychosis: Opportunities for secondary prevention. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 487–502.
20. Jamison, K.R. (1994). Touched with fire. New York: Simon and Schuster.
21. Jamison, K.R. (1996). An unquiet mind. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.
22. Johns, C.A., Stanley, M., ‖ Stanley, B. (1986). Suicide in schizophrenia. Annals the New York Academy of Science, 486, 294–299.
23. Lapsley, H., Nikora, L.W., ‖ Black, R. (2002). Kia Mauri Tau! Narratives of recovery from disabling mental health problems Wellington: Wellington Mental Health Commission.
24. Lind, E.A. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants’ evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law and Society Review, 24, 953–971.
25. Leibrich, I. (1999). A gift of stories. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
26. Linszen, D. ‖ Birchwood, M. (2000). The early phase of psychosis and schizophrenia: A critical period for patients, families and the profession. In M. Birchwood, D. Fowler, ‖ C. Jackson (Eds.), Early intervention in psychosis. Chichester: John Wiley.
27. McCracken (1988) 38 A Crim R 92.
28. Mitchell, I.B., (1999). Narrative and client-centred representation. What is a true believer to do when his two favourite theories collide? Clinical Law Review, 6, 85–126.
29. Monovel, W., 2001. Mental illness is not a crime: The impact of the adversarial system. Australasian Psychiatry,. 9(3), 219–223.
30. Nagel, T., (2003). Involuntary Treatment in the Remote Northern Territory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10, 171–178
31. Obomanu, W. ‖ Kennedy, H.G., (2001). “Juridogenic” harm: Statutory principles for the new mental health tribunals. Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 331–333.
32. Peay, J., (1989). Tribunals on trial: A study of decisionmaking under the Mental Health Act 1983. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Perkins, E., Arthur, S., ‖ Nazroo, I., (2000). Decision-making in mental health review tribunals, Liverpool, UK at Liverpool Health and Community Care Research Unit.
34. Perkins, E. (2002). Decision-making in mental health review tribunals. London: Central Books.
35. Perlin, M., (1989). Mental disability law: Civil and criminal. Charlottesville, Virginia: Michie Publishing.
36. Perlin, M., (2000). The hidden prejudice: Mental disability on trial, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
37. Perlin, M., (2003). Preface. In K. Diesfeld ‖ I. Freckelton (Eds.), Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence: International perspectives on civil commitment. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
38. Re the Appeal of AW, unreported, 14 October, 2002, Mental Health Review of Victoria.
39. Re the Appeal of MS (No 2) (1997; MHRBD(Vic) 476.
40. Selby, H., (2000). Winning in court. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
41. Stevens, S. (2003). Where is the asylum? In K. Diesfeld and I. Freckelton (Eds.), Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence: International perspectives on civil commitment. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
42. Susman, I., (1994). Resolving hospital conflicts: A study on therapeutic jurisprudence. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 22, 107–133.
43. Swain, P.A. (Ed.). (2002). In the shadow of the law. Sydney: Federation Press.
44. Sydoman, S.I., Cascardi, M., Poythress, N.G.R. ‖ Hinbond, L.M., (1977). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: A critique of Tyler’s analysis. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 202–221.
45. Tyler, T.T., (1996). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. In D.B. Wexler ‖ B.J. Winick (Eds.). Law in a therapeutic key (pp. 3–16). Durham, NC: Carolina University Press.
46. Vrij, A., (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
47. Wallace, C., Mullen, P.E., Burgess P., et al. (1998). Serious criminal offending and mental disorder: A case linkage study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 477–489.
48. Weeks, D. ‖ James, I., (1995). Eccentrics: A study of sanity and strangeness. New York: Kodansha International.
49. Westermeyer, J.F., Harrow, J., ‖ Marengo, J.T., (1991). Risk for suicide in schizophrenia and other psychotic and non-psychotic disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 259–266.
50. Wexler, D.B., ‖ Winick, B.J., (1996). Law in a therapeutic key. Durham, NC: Carolina University Press.
51. Winick, B.J., (1997). The right to refuse mental health treatment. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
52. Winick, B.J., A therapeutic jurisprudence model for civil commitment. (2003). In K. Diesfeld, ‖ I. Freckelton, 2003. Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence: International perspectives on civil commitment. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
53. World Health Organization, (1973). Report of the first pilot study of schizophrenia. Geneva: Author.