Community college psychology faculty uses and attitudes toward computer-assisted instruction

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 547-555

  Glasgow, Yvette ^a  

^a Kaskaskia College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011452107     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10668920590954006     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Armistead, L. P., Vogler, D. E., & Branch, R. C. (1987). Impact of microcomputers on community college faculty. Community College Review, 15(2), 38-44.
2. Cohen, A. M. & Brawer, F. B. (2003). The American community college (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Dusick, D. M. & Yildirim, S. (2000). Faculty computer use and training: Identifying distinct needs for different populations. Community College Review, 27(4), 33-47.
4. Gonzalez-Sullivan, L. (2001). Will your college be ready? Community College Journal, 71(6), 8-13.
5. Green, K. C. (2001). Campus computing, 2001: The twelfth national survey of computing and information technology in American higher education. Encino, CA: Campus Computing Project.
6. Merisotis, J. P. & Phipps, R. A. (1999). What’s the difference? Outcomes of distance vs. traditional classroom-based learning. Change, 31(3), 12-17.
7. Parnell, D. (1990). Dateline 2000: The new higher education agenda. Washington, DC: The Community College Press.
8. Patton, J. (2001). Use ofcomputer-assisted instruction in business courses at community colleges. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
9. Virtual academy takes a learning-centered approach to online instruction. (2002). Community College Journal, 73(2), 6.