Erratum to: No regrets: Young adult patients in psychiatry report positive reactions to biobank participation [BMC Psychiatry. 17, (2017)(21)] DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1199-0;No regrets: Young adult patients in psychiatry report positive reactions to biobank participation

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Cunningham, Janet L ^a   Zanzi, Manuel ^a   Willebrand, Mimmie ^a   Ekselius, Lisa ^a   Ramklint, Mia ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biobanking; Disability; Ethics; General psychiatry; Voluntariness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; BIOBANK; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; MENTAL PATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SALIVA ANALYSIS; SWEDEN; ADOLESCENT; EMOTION; MENTAL DISEASE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; TRENDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85011371471     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1228-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Miller AH, Raison CL. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;16(1):22-34.
2. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbes, immunity, and behavior: psychoneuroimmunology meets the microbiome. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;42(1):178-92.
3. Gupta UC, Kharawala S. Informed consent in psychiatry clinical research: a conceptual review of issues, challenges, and recommendations. Perspect Clin Res. 2012;3(1):8-15.
4. Yanos PT, Stanley BS, Greene CS. Research risk for persons with psychiatric disorders: a decisional framework to meet the ethical challenge. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(3):374-83.
5. Nelson RM, Merz JF. Voluntariness of consent for research: an empirical and conceptual review. Med Care. 2002;40(9 Suppl):V69-80.
6. Helgesson G. In defense of broad consent. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012;21(1):40-50.
7. Amarasinghe M, Tan H, Larkin S, Ruggeri B, Lobo S, Brittain P, Broadbent M, Baggaley M, Schumann G. Banking the brain. Addressing the ethical challenges of a mental-health biobank. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(5):400-4.
8. de Graaf R, Ten Have M, van Dorsselaer S, Schoemaker C, Vollebergh WA. Negative and positive participant responses to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(7):521-7.
9. Boothroyd R. The impact of research participation on adults with severe mental illness. Ment Health Serv Res. 2000;2(4):213-22.
10. Jorm AF, Kelly CM, Morgan AJ. Participant distress in psychiatric research: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2007;37(7):917-26.
11. Griffin MG, Resick PA, Waldrop AE, Mechanic MB. Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm? J Trauma Stress. 2003;16(3):221-7.
12. Widom CS, Czaja SJ. Reactions to research participation in vulnerable subgroups. Account Res. 2005;12(2):115-38.
13. Kassam-Adams N, Newman E. The reactions to research participation questionnaires for children and for parents (RRPQ-C and RRPQ-P). Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002;24(5):336-42.
14. Sheehan D. The anxiety disease. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons; 1983.
15. Arbuckle R, Frye MA, Brecher M, Paulsson B, Rajagopalan K, Palmer S, Degl' Innocenti A. The psychometric validation of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2009;165(1-2):163-74.
16. Hodgins DC. Reliability and validity of the Sheehan Disability Scale modified for pathological gambling. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:177.
17. Hörberg N, Kouros I, Ekselius L, Ramklint M. The Swedish version of the Sheehan Disability Scale - a valid and brief measure of functioning. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2016;4(1):1-7.
18. Lewis C, Clotworthy M, Hilton S, Magee C, Robertson MJ, Stubbins LJ, Corfield J. Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e003056.
19. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Pub Health. 2006;16(4):433-40.
20. Eurobarometer 73.1 Biotechnology. [ http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf ].
21. First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 1996.
22. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33. quiz 34-57.
23. Sheehan DV, Sheehan KH, Shytle RD, Janavs J, Bannon Y, Rogers JE, Milo KM, Stock SL, Wilkinson B. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(3):313-26.
24. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791-804.
25. Svanborg P, Asberg M. A new self-rating scale for depression and anxiety states based on the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994;89(1):21-8.
26. Svanborg P, Asberg M. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord. 2001;64(2-3):203-16.
27. Mattila-Evenden M, Svanborg P, Gustavsson P, Asberg M. Determinants of self-rating and expert rating concordance in psychiatric out-patients, using the affective subscales of the CPRS. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;94(6):386-96.
28. Gustavsson JP, Bergman H, Edman G, Ekselius L, von Knorring L, Linder J. Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP): construction, internal consistency and normative data. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;102(3):217-25.
29. Sheehan DV. The diagnosis and drug treatment of anxiety disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1983;7(4-6):599-603.
30. Leon AC, Shear MK, Portera L, Klerman GL. Assessing impairment in patients with panic disorder: the Sheehan Disability Scale. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992;27(2):78-82.
31. Gratz KL. Measurement of deliberate self-harm: preliminary data on the deliberate self-harm inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2001;23:253-63.
32. Buysse DJ, Reynolds 3rd CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193-213.
33. Bremner JD, Vermetten E, Mazure CM. Development and preliminary psychometric properties of an instrument for the measurement of childhood trauma: the Early Trauma Inventory. Depress Anxiety. 2000;12(1):1-12.
34. Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(1):75-83.
35. Willebrand M. Presence of psychiatric morbidity and regrets about participation in trauma-related research-a pilot study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(5):476-8.