The DONE framework: Creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2.0 of determinants of nutrition and eating

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Stok, F Marijn ^a   Hoffmann, Stefan ^b   Volkert, Dorothee ^c   Boeing, Heiner ^d   Ensenauer, Regina ^e   Stelmach Mardas, Marta ^d,f   Kiesswetter, Eva ^c   Weber, Alisa ^g   Rohm, Harald ^h   Lien, Nanna ⁱ   Brug, Johannes ^j   Holdsworth, Michelle ^k   Renner, Britta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^d GERMAN INSTITUTE OF HUMAN NUTRITION   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^f POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^h DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^j VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EATING; HUMAN; ADULT; CHILD; DIET; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION; NUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; CHILD; DIET; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; NUTRITIONAL STATUS;

EID: 85011339226     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171077     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wansink B, Sobal J. Mindless eating the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environ Behav. 2007; 39:106-123.
2. Hofmann W, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. What people desire, feel conflicted about, and try to resist in everyday life. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23:582-588. doi:10.1177/0956797612437426 PMID: 22547657.
3. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas T, Thompson D, Baranowski J. Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts? Obes Res. 2003; 11:23S-43S. doi:10.1038/oby.2003.222 PMID: 14569036.
4. KoÈster EP. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Qual Prefer. 2009: 20;70-82.
5. Symmank C, Mai R, Hoffmann S, Stok FM, Renner B, Lien N, et al. Predictors of food decision making: A systematic interdisciplinary mapping (SIM) review. Appetite, in press.
6. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec Proc. 1991; 50:179-211.
7. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
8. Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo J, Petty R, eds. Social Psychophysiology. New York: Guilford Press; 1983:153-176.
9. Renner B, Schwarzer R. Social-cognitive factors in health behavior change. In: Suls J, Walson K, eds. Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2003:169-196.
10. Vlaev I, Dolan P. Action change theory: A reinforcement learning perspective on behavior change. Rev Gen Psychol. 2015; 19:69-95.
11. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin; 1984.
12. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol. 1988; 7:355-386. PMID: 3049068.
13. Schwarzer R. Self-regulatory processes in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. J Health Psychol. 1999; 4:115-127. doi:10.1177/135910539900400208 PMID: 22021474.
14. Kremers SP, De Bruijn GJ, Visscher TL, van Mechelen W, de Vries NK, Brug J. Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3:9. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-9 PMID: 16700907.
15. Sleddens EF, Kroeze W, Kohl LF, Bolten LM, Venema E, Kaspers P, et al. Correlates of dietary behavior in adults: An umbrella review. Nutr Rev. 2015; 73:477-499. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuv007 PMID: 26106126.
16. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Falk LW. Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite. 1996; 26:247-266. doi:10.1006/appe.1996.0019 PMID: 8800481.
17. Hummel E, Hoffmann I. Complexity of nutritional behavior: capturing and depicting its interrelated factors in a cause-effect model. Ecol Food Nutr. 2016: in press.
18. Booth SL, Sallis JF, Ritenbaugh C, Hill JO, Birch LL, Frank LD, et al. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: Rationale, influences, and leverage points. Nutr Rev. 2001; 59: S21-S36. PMID: 11330630.
19. Contento IR. Nutrition education: Linking research, theory and practice. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008; 17:176-179. PMID: 18296331.
20. Glass TA, McAtee MJ. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62:1650-1671. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.044 PMID: 16198467.
21. Bock A-K, Maragkoudakis P, Wollgast J, Caldeira S, Czimbalmos A, Rzychon M, et al. JRC Foresight Study: Tomorrow's Healthy Society, Research Priorities for Foods and Diets. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Joint Research Centre; 2014.
22. Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg HP, Kroeze W, Ahrens W, Allais O, Andersen LF, et al. Towards the integration and development of a cross-European research network and infrastructure: The DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity (DEDIPAC) Knowledge Hub. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:1-10.
23. Economos CD, Brownson RC, DeAngelis MA, Foerster SB, Foreman CT, Gregson J, et al. What lessons have been learned from other attempts to guide social change? Nutr Rev, 2001; 59:S40-S56. PMID: 11360889.
24. Buzan T. Mind Mapping. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Group; 2006.
25. Wexler MN. The who, what and why of knowledge mapping. J Knowl Manage. 2001; 5:249-264.