Introducing strategic environmental assessment to the madrid protocol: Lessons from international experience

Polar Journal

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 36-50

  Marsden, Simon ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Madrid protocol; Sea directive; Sea protocol; Strategic environmental assessment (sea)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011320219     PISSN: 2154896X     EISSN: 21548978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2011.569379     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Albrecht, E., 2008. “Transboundary Consultations in Strategic Environmental Assessment”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26:289–98.
2. Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. 2000. “Antarctic Strategic Environmental Assessment:Application to the Growing Antarctic Tourism Industry”. Information Paper 10, XII Special Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. 2000, The Hague.
3. Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. 2001. “Strategic Needs and Decision-Making in Antarctica”. Information Paper 54, XXIV Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. 2001, St Petersburg.
4. Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. 2002. “Strategic Environmental Assessment in Antarctica:‘A Stepping Stone’ to Madrid Protocol Objectives”. Information Paper, XXV Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. 2002. pp. 1–7. Agenda Item 4c
5. nd Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting”. April6–72009, Baltimore.
6. Bastmeijer, K., and Roura, R., 2004. “Regulating Antarctic Tourism and the Precautionary Principle”. American Journal of International Law, 98:763–81.
7. Bastmeijer, Kees, and Roura, Ricardo. 2008. “Environmental Impact Assessment in Antarctica”. In Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment, Edited by:Bastmeijer, Kees, and Koivurova, Timo. 175–219. Leiden/Boston:Martinus Nijhoff.
8. Blay, S.K.N., 1992. “New Trends in the Protection of the Antarctic Environment:The 1991 Madrid Protocol”. American Journal of International Law, 86:377–99.
9. Bonvoisin, Nicholas. 2010. “Transboundary Issues in SEA”. In Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Edited by:Sadler, Barry, Aschemann, Ralf, Dusik, Juri, Fischer, Thomas, Partidario, Maria, and Verheem, Rob. London:Earthscan.
10. Carter, J.G., Wood, C.M., and Baker, M., 2003. “The Environmental Appraisal of National Park Management Plans in England and Wales”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46:271–90.
11. Commission of the European Communities. Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Application and Effectiveness of the Directive on Strategic Environmental Assessment (Directive 2001/42/EC). Brussels, 14 September 2009, COM(2009) 469 final (2009a)
12. Commission of the European Communities. Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC, as amended by Directives 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC). Brussels, 23 July 2009, COM(2009) 378 final (2009b)
13. European Community Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, [1985] OJ L175/40 (as amended by Council Directives 97/11 [1997] OJ L 73/5 and 2003/35 [2003] OJ L156/17
14. European Community Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, [2001] OJ L197/30
15. th Plenary Session, 14 and 15 April 2010, Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on Improving the EIA and SEA Directives, Rapporteur José Macário Correia, ENVE-V”001, CdR 38/2010 fin, Brussels, 15 April 2010
16. Fallon, L.D., and Kriwoken, L.K., 2005. “Environmental Impact Assessment under the Protocol on Environment Protection to the Antarctic Treaty and Australian Legislation”. Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law, 2:67–103.
17. Fischer, Thomas. 2007. The Theory and Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment, London:Earthscan.
18. Gjerde, K.M., 2008. Options for Addressing Regulatory and Governance Gaps in the International Regime for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, Gland:IUCN. IUCN Marine Law and Policy Paper No. 2
19. Government of Italy. Preliminary Consideration on ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment’, the Case of Edmonson Point Area, Ross Sea, Antarctica. XXVII Information Paper. Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting.
20. Hemmings, A.D., and Kriwoken, L.K., 2010. “High Level Antarctic EIA under the Madrid Protocol:State Practice and the Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation Process”. International Environmental Agreements:Politics, Law and Economics, 10:187–208.
21. Hemmings, A.D., and Roura, R., 2003. “A Square Peg in a Round Hole:Fitting Impact Assessment under the Antarctic Environmental Protocol to Antarctic Tourism”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21:13–24.
22. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. 2009. Marine Spatial Planning–A Step by Step Approach towards Ecosystem-Based Management, Paris:UNESCO.
23. Joyner, Christopher C., 1998. Governing the Frozen Commons:The Antarctic Regime and Environmental Protection, Columbia, SC:University of Southern Carolina Press.
24. Koivurova, T., 2005. “Environmental Protection in the Arctic and Antarctic:Can the Polar Regimes Learn From Each Other?”. International Journal of Legal Information, 33:203–18.
25. Kriwoken, L.K., and Holmes, N., 2007. “Emerging Issues of Australia’s Sub-Antarctic Islands:Macquarie Island and Heard Island and McDonald Islands”. In Looking South:Australia’s Antarctic Agenda, Edited by:Kriwoken, Lorne K., Jabour, Julia, and Hemmings, Alan D., 149–64. Annandale, VA:Federation Press.
26. Kriwoken, Lorne K., Jabour, Julia, and Hemmings, Alan D., eds. 2007. Looking South:Australia’s Antarctic Agenda, Annandale, VA:Federation Press.
27. Kriwoken, L.K., and Rootes, D., 2000. “Tourism on Ice:Environmental Impact Assessment of Antarctic Tourism”. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18:138–50.
28. Lyons, D., 1993. “Environmental Impact Assessment in Antarctica under the Protocol on Environmental Protection”. Polar Record, 29:111–20.
29. Marsden, S., 2011. “Assessment of Transboundary Environmental Effects in the Pearl River Delta Region:Is there a Role for Strategic Environmental Assessment?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31 doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.010
30. Marsden, S., 2010. “Introducing Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Madrid Protocol:The Politics of EIA”. Paper Presented to the Symposium on the Politics of Antarctica, University of Canterbury. July8–92010, Christchurch.
31. Marsden, S., 2005. “Strategic Environmental Assessment and Protected Areas Management in the Sub-Antarctic:Are Some Areas Better Protected Than Others?”. Paper Presented at the International Association for Impact Assessment Conference, International Experience and Perspectives on SEA. September2005, Prague.
32. Marsden, Simon. 2008. Strategic Environmental Assessment in International and European Law, London:Earthscan.
33. Marsden, Simon, and Koivurova, Timo, eds. 2011, in press. Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in the European Union:The Espoo Convention and its Kiev Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment, London:Earthscan.
34. McGrath, C., 2006. “Swirls in the Stream of Australian Environmental Law:Debate on the EPBC Act.”. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 23:165–84.
35. th Committee:Agenda item 5(a)–The environmental impacts of anthropogenic activities on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction
36. Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, 4 October 1991, 30 International Legal Materials at 1455
37. Redgwell, C., 1994. “Environmental Protection in Antarctica:The 1991 Protocol”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43:599–634.
38. Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe and United Nations Development Programme. Benefits of an SEA, Szentendre:Regional Environmental Centre, 2003.
39. nd Annual Conference Event of the International Association for Impact Assessment:Assessing the Impact of Impact Assessment. June15–212001, The Hague.
40. Scott, K.N., 2008. “Regulating Subglacial Aquatic Research Under the Antarctic Treaty System”. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 23:135–54.
41. Scott, S.V., 2001. “How Cautious is Precautious? Antarctic Tourism and the Precautionary Principle”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50:963
42. Therrien-Richards, S., 2000. “SEA of Parks Canada Management Plans”. In Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment, Edited by:Partidario, Maria R., and Clark, Ray. 141–54. Boca Raton:CRC-Lewis.
43. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo), 30 ILM (1991), 802
44. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Espoo Convention (Kiev, 21 May 2003), in force 11 July 2010
45. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Undated. Applying the Protocol on SEA
46. United Nations Environment Program. Note by the Executive Secretary to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Review of Scientific and Technical Aspects of Global, Regional and National Strategic Environmental Assessment Frameworks and their Relevance to Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, Background Document to Expert Workshop, Manila 18–20 November 2009, UNEP/CBD/EW-EIAMA/1/INF/1/Add.1, 10 November 2009
47. Warner, Robyn. 2009. Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction:Strengthening the International Law Framework, Leiden/Boston:Martinus Nijhoff.