Is ‘science as social’ a feminist insight?

Social Epistemology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 233-249

  Rolin, Kristina ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011187038     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0269172022000025606     Document Type: Note

References (53)

1. ANDERSON, E., 1995, Knowledge, human interests, and objectivity in feminist epistemology. Philosophical Topics, 23, 27–58.
2. FAUSTO-STERLING, A., 2000, Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality (New York: Basic Books).
3. FERBER, M. A., 1986, Citations: are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs, 11, 381–389.
4. FERBER, M. A., 1988, Citations and networking. Gender & Society, 2, 82–89.
5. GROSS, P. R. and LEVITT, N., 1994, Higher Superstition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
6. HAACK, S., 1996, Science as social?–Yes and no. In L. H. Nelson and J. Nelson (eds), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 79–93.
7. HALL, R. and SANDLER, B., 1982, The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? (Washington DC: Association of American Colleges).
8. HARDWIG, J., 1985, Epistemic dependence. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 335–349.
9. HARDWIG, J., 1991, The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 693–708.
10. HULL, D. L., 1997, What’s wrong with invisible-hand explanations? In L. Darden (ed.), Proceedings of the 1996 Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Supplement to Philosophy of Science, 64, S117–S126.
11. HUSU, L., 2001, Sexism, Support and Survival in the Academy. PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.
12. INTEMANN, K., 2000, Are value judgements always irrelevant to the justification of scientific claims? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vancouver).
13. KELLER, E. F., 1997, Developmental biology as a feminist cause? Osiris, 12, 16–28.
14. KELLER, E. F. and LONGINO, H. E. (eds), 1996, Feminism and Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
15. KITCHER, P., 1990, The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5–22.
16. KITCHER, P., 1992, Authority, deference, and role of individual reasoning in science. In E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimensions of Science (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 244–271.
17. KITCHER, P., 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
18. KOERTGE, N., 1998, Postmodernisms and the problem of scientific literacy. In N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 257–271.
19. KOERTGE, N., 2000, ‘New age’ philosophies of science: constructivism, feminism, and postmodernism. British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 51, 667–683.
20. KUHN, T., 1977, Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In T. Kuhn (ed.), The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 320–339.
21. LATOUR, B. and WOOLGAR, S., 1986 [1979], Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
22. LAUDAN, L., 1990, Demystifying underdetermination. In C. W. Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories. Volume 14 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 267–297.
23. LLOYD, E. A., 1996, Science and anti-science: objectivity and its real enemies. In L. H. Nelson and J. Nelson (eds), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 217–259.
24. LONG, J. S., 1992, Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71, 159–178.
25. LONGINO, H. E., 1990, Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
26. LONGINO, H. E., 1994, The fate of knowledge in social theories of science. In F. F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham and London: Rowman and Little. eld Publishers).
27. LONGINO, H. E., 1995, Gender, politics and the theoretical virtues. Synthese, 104, 383–397.
28. LONGINO, H. E., 1999, Feminist epistemology. In J. Greco and E. Sosa (eds), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 327–353.
29. LONGINO, H. E., 2002, The Fate of Knowledge (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
30. MCMULLIN, E., 1983, Values in science. In P. D. Asquith and T. Nickels (eds), PSA 1982, volume 2 (East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association), pp. 3–28.
31. MOULTON, J., 1983, A paradigm of philosophy: the adversary method. In S. Harding and M. Hintikka (eds), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht, Boston and London: D. Reidel Publishing Company).
32. NELSON, L. H., 1990, Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
33. NYE, R. A., 1997. Medicine and science as masculine ‘fields of honor’. Osiris, 12, 60–79.
34. PAYNE, A. M., and SHOEMARK, L. (eds), 1995, Women, Culture and Universities: A Chilly Climate? Conference Proceedings (Sydney: UTS).
35. PINNICK, C., 1994, Feminist epistemology: implications for philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 61, 646–657.
36. POTTER, E., 2001, Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
37. ROLIN, K., 1999, Can gender ideologies in uence the practice of the physical sciences? Perspectives on Science, 7, 510–533.
38. ROSSITER, M. W., 1982, Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).
39. ROUSH, S., 2001, Constructive empiricism and the role of values in science. Paper presented at the conference on ‘Value-Free Science: Ideal or Illusion?’ (University of Alabama, Birmingham).
40. SCHIEBINGER, L., 1989, The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
41. SHAPIN, S., 1994, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
42. SOLOMON, M., 1992. Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 59, 439–455.
43. SOLOMON, M., 1994, Social empiricism. Noûs, 28, 325–343.
44. SOLOMON, M., 2001, Social empiricism (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
45. SONNERT, G. with the assistance of Holton, G., 1995, Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
46. SUNDSTROM, R., 2001, Values and race in the social sciences: residential segregation as an example. Paper presented at the conference on ‘Value-Free Science: Ideal or Illusion?’ (University of Alabama, Birmingham).
47. TRAWEEK, S., 1988, Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
48. WATSON, P. and KENNEDY, M., 1991, The development of horticulture in the Eastern Woodlands of North America: women’s role. In J. G. Gero and M. W. Conkey (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women and prehistory (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 255–275.
49. WENNERAÊ S, C., and WOLD, A., 1997, Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341–343.
50. WRAY, K. B., 2001, Evaluating scientists. Paper presented at the conference on ‘Value Free Science: An Ideal or Illusion?’ (University of Alabama, Birmingham).
51. WYLIE, A., 1996, The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science. In P. Galison and D. J. Stump (eds), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power (Stanford: Stanford University Press), pp. 311–343.
52. WYLIE, A., 2000. Feminism in philosophy of science: making sense of contingency and constraint. In M. Fricker and J. Hornsby (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 166–184.
53. ZUCKERMAN, H., COLE, J. R. and BRUER, J. T. (eds), 1991, The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (New Haven: Yale University Press).