'New age' philosophies of science: Constructivism, feminism and postmodernism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Volumn 51, Issue SUPPL., 2000, Pages 667-683

  Koertge, Noretta ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242620739     PISSN: 00070882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bloor, D. [1976]: Knowledge and Social Imagery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bloor, D. and Edge, D. [1998]: 'Letter: Knowing Reality Through Society', Physics World, March, p. 23.
3. Boyd, R., Gasper, P. and Trout, J. (eds) [1991]: The Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Campbell, R. [1998]: Illusions of Paradox: A Feminist Epistemology Naturalized, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
5. Couvalis, G. [1997]: The Philosophy of Science: Science and Objectivity, London: Sage.
6. Curd, M. and Cover, J. [1998]: Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, London: W.W. Norton & Co.
7. Darden, L. [1991]: Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Fausto-Sterling, Anne [1985]: Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men, New York: Basic Books.
9. Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M. [1953]: Readings in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
10. Franklin, A. [1998]: 'Do Mutants Die of Natural Causes? The Case of Atomic Parity Violation', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Glashow, S. [1992]: 'The Death of Science!?', in R. Elvee (ed.), The End of Science: Attack and Defense, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
12. Glymour, C. [1980]: Theory and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13. Gross, P. [1988]: 'Bashful Eggs, Macho Sperm, and Tonypandy', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Gross, P. and Levitt, N. [1994]: Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
15. Gross, P., Levitt, N. and Lewis, M. [1996]: The Flight from Science and Reason, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
16. Haack, S. [1993]: 'Epistemological Reflections of an Old Feminist', Reason Papers, 18, pp. 31-43.
17. Hacking, I. [1999]: The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Holton, G. [1993]: Science and Anti-Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Hull, D. [1988]: Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kitcher, P. [1993]: The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Kitcher, P. [1998]: 'A Plea for Science Studies', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Kitcher, P. [2000]: 'Reviving the Sociology of Science', Philosophy of Science, forthcoming in Supplemental Proceedings.
23. Klee, R. [1999]: Scientific Inquiry: Readings in the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Klemke, E. et al. (eds) [1998]: Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
25. Koertge, N. [1996]: 'Wrestling with the Social Constructor', in P. Gross et al. (eds), The Flight from Science and Reason, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
26. Koertge, N. [1998]: 'Postmodernisms and the Problem of Scientific Literacy', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Koertge, N. [1999]: 'The Zero-Sum Assumption and the Symmetry Thesis', Social Studies of Science, 29, pp. 561-68.
28. Koertge, N. [2000]: 'Science, Values and the Value of Science', Philosophy of Science, forthcoming in Supplemental Proceedings.
29. Kourany, J. [1998]: Scientific Knowledge: Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Science, 2nd edn., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
30. Kuhn, T. [1962]: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Lakatos, I. [1978]: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Latour, B. [1988]: Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Levitt, N. [1999]: Prometheus Bedeviled: Science and the Contradictions of Contemporary Culture, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34. Longino, H. [1995]: 'Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues', Synthese, 104, pp. 383-97.
35. McErlean, J. [2000]: Philosophies of Science: From Foundations to Contemporary Issues, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
36. MacKenzie, D. [1978]: 'Statistical Theory and Social Interests: A Case Study', Social Studies of Science, 8, pp. 35-83.
37. MacKenzie, D. [1999]: 'The Zero-Sum Evaluation: Reply to Sullivan', Social Studies of Science, 29, pp. 223-34.
38. Mackie, J. [1974]: The Cement of the Universe, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. Magnani, L., Nersessian, N. and Thagard, P. (eds) [1999]: Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
40. Matthews, M. [1998]: Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
41. Nagel, E. [1961]: The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42. Nanda, M. [1992]: '"History is What Hurts": A Materialist Feminist Perspective on the Green Revolution and its Ecofeminist Critics', in R. Hennessy and C. Ingraham (eds), Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference, and Women's Lives, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43. Nelson, A. [1994]: 'How Could Scientific Facts be Socially Constructed?', Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 25, pp. 535-47.
44. Newman, W. [1998]: 'Alchemy, Domination, and Gender', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. Patai, D. and Koertge, N. [1994]: Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies, New York: Basic Books.
46. Pickering, A. [1984]: Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Pinch, T. [1986]: Confronting Nature, Dordrecht: Reidel.
48. Pinnick, C. [1994]: 'Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science', Philosophy of Science, 61, pp. 646-57.
49. Popper, K. [1994]: The Myth of the Framework, London: Routledge.
50. Radcliffe Richards, J. [1996]: 'Why Feminist Epistemology Isn't', in P. Gross et al. (eds), The Flight from Science and Reason, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
51. Ross, A. (ed.) [1996a]: 'Special Issue on the Science Wars', Social Text, 46/47.
52. Ross, A. (ed.) [1996b]: Science Wars, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53. Rossiter, M. [1985]: Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
54. Salmon, M. et al. [1992]: Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
55. Scheffler, I. [1967]: Science and Subjectivity, Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.
56. Schiebinger, L. [1995]: Nature's Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science, Boston: Beacon Press.
57. Schiebinger, L. [1999]: Has Feminism Changed Science?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Searle, J. [1995]: The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press.
59. Soble, A. [1998]: 'In Defense of Bacon', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J. [1998]: Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, London: Profile Books.
61. Sommers, C. [1995]: Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women, New York: Simon & Schuster.
62. Stotsky, S. (ed.) [2000]: What's at Stake in the K-12 Standards Wars?, New York: Peter Lang.
63. Stove, D. [1982]: Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
64. Sullivan, P. [1998]: 'An Engineer Dissects Two Case Studies: Hayles on Fluid Mechanics, and MacKenzie on Statistics', in N. Koertge (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. [1982]: 'Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases', in Kahneman et al. (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Weinberg, S. [1996]: 'Reply', New York Review of Books, 3 August, pp. 55-56.
67. Woolgar, S. and Ashmore, M. [1988]: 'The Next Step: An Introduction to the Reflexive Project', in S. Woolgar (ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity, London: Sage Publications.
68. Zuckerman, H. et al. (eds) [1991]: The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, New York: W.W. Norton & Co.