GlGetFeedback - Towards automatic feedback and assessment for OpenGL 3D modelling assignments

International Conference Image and Vision Computing New Zealand

Volumn 0, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Hodgkinson, Blake ^a   Lutteroth, Christof ^b   Wunsche, Burkhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D MODELING; APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API); COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS; AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT; AUTOMATIC FEEDBACK; COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION; CORRECT SOLUTION; FORMATIVE FEEDBACKS; PROGRAMMING ASSIGNMENTS; RENDERING PIPELINES;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 85010915180     PISSN: 21512191     EISSN: 21512205     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IVCNZ.2016.7804418     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. A. Mcgettrick, R. Boyle, R. Ibbett, J. Lloyd, G. Lovegrove, and K. Mander, "Grand challenges in computing: Education-a summary," Comput. J., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 42-48, Jan. 2005.
2. B. Du Boulay, "Some difficulties of learning to program," Journal of Educational Computing Research, no. 1, pp. 57-73, 1986.
3. L. Layman, L. Williams, and K. Slaten, "Note to self: Make assignments meaningful," in Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2007, pp. 459-463. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1227310.1227466
4. J. Hattie and H. Timperley, "The power of feedback," Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81-112, 2007.
5. N. Duncan, "'feedforward': improving students' use of tutors' comments," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 271-283, 2007.
6. C. Ott, A. Robins, and K. Shephard, "Translating principles of effective feedback for students into the cs1 context," Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1:1-1:27, Jan. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1145/2737596
7. H. Keuning, J. Jeuring, and B. Heeren, "Towards a systematic review of automated feedback generation for programming exercises," in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ser. ITiCSE '16. ACM, 2016, pp. 41-46. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1145/2899415.2899422
8. R. R. Lewis, "Coaster: Teaching computer graphics with a comprehensive project-work in progress," J. Comput. Sci. Coll., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 192-199, Oct. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfmid=2379703.2379740
9. A. Peternier, D. Thalmann, and F. Vexo, Mental Vision: A Computer Graphics Teaching Platform. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 223-232. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11736639 31
10. A. Sanna, F. Lamberti, G. Paravati, and C. Demartini, "Automatic assessment of 3d modeling exams," IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2-10, 2012.
11. F. Lamberti, A. Sanna, G. Paravati, and G. Carlevaris, "Automatic grading of 3d computer animation laboratory assignments," IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 280-290, 2014.
12. K. Shoemake and T. Duff, "Matrix animation and polar decomposition," in Proceedings of the Conference on Graphics Interface '92, 1992, pp. 258-264.