ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Circulation

Volumn 135, Issue 9, 2017, Pages e122-e137

  Chan, Wiley V ^a   Pearson, Thomas A ^a   Bennett, Glen C ^a   Cushman, William C ^a,b   Gaziano, Thomas A ^a   Gorman, Paul N ^a   Handler, Joel ^a   Krumholz, Harlan M ^a   Kushner, Robert F ^a   Mackenzie, Thomas D ^a   Sacco, Ralph L ^a   Smith, Sidney C ^a   Stevens, Victor J ^a   Wells, Barbara L ^a   Castillo, Graciela ^a   Heil, Susan K R ^a   Stephens, Jennifer ^a   Vann, Julie C Jacobson ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

AHA Scientific Statements; cost; detailing; effectiveness; evidence based; incentives; interventions; reminders; systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL AUDIT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDLINE; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HEMATOLOGIC DISEASES; LUNG DISEASES; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HEMATOLOGIC DISEASES; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES; NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE (U.S.); UNITED STATES;

EID: 85010877290     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000481     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NHLBI Cardiovascular Disease Thought Leaders Meeting Report: Research Translation, Dissemination, and Application-Moving Toward a New Vision and Strategic Framework. 2005. Available at: http: //www. nhlbi. nih. gov/health-pro/resources/heart/cardiovascular-disease-thoughtleaders-meeting-report. Accessed January 1, 2012.
2. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999; 282: 1458-65.
3. Gibbons GH, Shurin SB, Mensah GA, et al. Refocusing the agenda on cardiovascular guidelines: an announcement from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation. 2013; 128: 1713-15.
4. Simons-Morton DG, Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, et al. Influencing personal and environmental conditions for community health: a multilevel intervention model. Fam Community Health. 1988; 11: 25-35.
5. Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). EPOC Taxonomy. Available at: https: //epoc. cochrane. org/epoc-taxonomy. Accessed March 23, 2012.
6. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Rx for Change Database. Available at: http: //www. cadth. ca/en/resources/ rx-for-change. Accessed December 1, 2012.
7. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7: 10.
8. Cheung A, Weir M, Mayhew A, et al. Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior. Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 36.
9. Walsh J, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, et al. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 3: Hypertension Care). Technical Reviews, No. 9. 3. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, January 2005. Available at: http: //www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/books/NBK43920/. Accessed December 1, 2012.
10. Lu CY, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai SB, et al. Interventions designed to improve the quality and efficiency of medication use in managed care: a critical review of the literature-2001-2007. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 75.
11. Ostini R, Hegney D, Jackson C, et al. Systematic review of interventions to improve prescribing. Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43: 502-13.
12. Pearson SA, Ross-Degnan D, Payson A, et al. Changing medication use in managed care: a critical review of the available evidence. Am J Manag Care. 2003; 9: 715-31.
13. Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E, et al. Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ. 2002; 325: 925.
14. Bryan C, Boren SAThe use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature. Inform Prim Care. 2008; 16: 79-91.
15. Damiani G, Pinnarelli L, Colosimo SC, et al. The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10: 2.
16. Heselmans A, Van de Velde S, Donceel P, et al. Effectiveness of electronic guideline-based implementation systems in ambulatory care settings-a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 82.
17. Robertson J, Walkom E, Pearson SA, et al. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010; 18: 69-87.
18. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 92.
19. Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10: 247.
20. Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157: 29-43.
21. O'Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (4): CD000409.
22. Sahota N, Lloyd R, Ramakrishna A, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decisionmaker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 91.
23. Siddiqi K, Newell J, Robinson M. Getting evidence into practice: what works in developing countries? Int J Qual Health Care. 2005; 17: 447-54.
24. Tooher R, Middleton P, Pham C, et al. A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 397-415.
25. Cortoos PJ, Simoens S, Peetermans W, et al. Implementing a hospital guideline on pneumonia: a semi-quantitative review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 358-67.
26. Mauger B, Marbella A, Pines E, et al. Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: S274-83.
27. Caruso D, Kerrigan CL, Mastanduno MP, et al. Improving Value-Based Care and Outcomes of Clinical Populations in an Electronic Health Record System Environment. A Technical Report. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2011.
28. Bravata DM, Sundaram V, Lewis R, et al. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 5: Asthma Care). Technical Reviews, No. 9. 5. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2007. Available at: http: //www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/books/NBK43968/. Accessed September 18, 2016.
29. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8: iii-iv; 1-72.
30. Chaillet N, Dube E, Dugas M, et al. Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1234-45.
31. Lineker SC, Husted JA. Educational interventions for implementation of arthritis clinical practice guidelines in primary care: effects on health professional behavior. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37: 1562-9.
32. Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41: 1024-32.
33. Gagliardi AR, Alhabib S. Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 54.
34. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 6: CD000259.
35. Mansell G, Shapley M, Jordan JL, et al. Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61: e821-35.
36. Okelo SO, Butz AM, Sharma R, et al. Interventions to Modify Health Care Provider Adherence to Asthma Guidelines. Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 95. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013. Available at: http: //www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/books/NBK144097/. Accessed September 16, 2016.
37. Mahan CE, Spyropoulos AC. Venous thromboembolism prevention: a systematic review of methods to improve prophylaxis and decrease events in the hospitalized patient. Hosp Pract. 2010; 38: 97-108.
38. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 641-51.
39. Collinsworth AW, Priest EL, Campbell CR, et al. A review of multifaceted care approaches for the prevention and mitigation of delirium in intensive care units. J Intens Care Med. 2016; 31: 127-41.
40. Chaillet N, Dumont AEvidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth. 2007; 34: 53-64.
41. Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011: CD005528.
42. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005; 330: 765.
43. Nieuwlaat R, Connolly SJ, Mackay JA, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 90.
44. Tan K, Dear PR, Newell SJ. Clinical decision support systems for neonatal care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; 2: CD004211.
45. Jeffery R, Iserman E, Haynes RB. CDSS Systematic Review Team. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2013; 30: 739-45.
46. Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 9: CD008451.
47. Carlsen B, Glenton C, Pope C. Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57: 971-8.
48. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, et al. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8: 38.
49. Schunemann HJ, Cook D, Grimshaw J, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: from evidence to application: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004; 126: 688S-96S.
50. Simpson SH, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR. Do guidelines guide pneumonia practice? A systematic review of interventions and barriers to best practice in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. Respir Care Clin N Am. 2005; 11: 1-13.
51. Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Das JK, et al. Evidence from district level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reprod Health. 2014; 11 (Suppl 2): S3.
52. Dulko D. Audit and feedback as a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy: a model for acute care nurse practitioners. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007; 4 (Suppl 2): 200-9.
53. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001; 39 (Suppl 2): II2-45.
54. Grindrod KA, Patel P, Martin JE. What interventions should pharmacists employ to impact health practitioners' prescribing practices? Ann Pharmacother. 2006; 40: 1546-57.
55. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 2: CD000259.
56. Brouwers MC, Garcia K, Makarski J, et al. The landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: what do we know and where to next? A review of systematic reviews. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 130.