ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1076-1092

  Chan, Wiley V ^a   Pearson, Thomas A ^a   Bennett, Glen C ^a   Cushman, William C ^a   Gaziano, Thomas A ^a   Gorman, Paul N ^a   Handler, Joel ^a   Krumholz, Harlan M ^a   Kushner, Robert F ^a   MacKenzie, Thomas D ^a   Sacco, Ralph L ^a   Smith, Sidney C ^a   Stevens, Victor J ^a   Wells, Barbara L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

ACC AHA Clinical Practice Guideline; cost; detailing; effectiveness; evidence based; incentives; interventions; reminders; systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL AUDIT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PROGRAM COST EFFECTIVENESS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); ADULT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85010877159     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. 1 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NHLBI Cardiovascular Disease Thought Leaders Meeting Report: Research Translation, Dissemination, and Application - Moving Toward a New Vision and Strategic Framework. 2005. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/resources/heart/cardiovascular-disease-thought-leaders-meeting-report. Accessed January 1, 2012.
2. 2 Cabana, M.D., Rand, C.S., Powe, N.R., et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282 (1999), 1458–1465.
3. 3 Gibbons, G.H., Shurin, S.B., Mensah, G.A., et al. Refocusing the agenda on cardiovascular guidelines: an announcement from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. J Am Coll Cardiol 62 (2013), 1396–1398.
4. 4 Simons-Morton, D.G., Simons-Morton, B.G., Parcel, G.S., et al. Influencing personal and environmental conditions for community health: a multilevel intervention model. Fam Community Health 11 (1988), 25–35.
5. 5 Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). EPOC Taxonomy. Available at: https://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-taxonomy. Accessed March 23, 2012.
6. 6 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Rx for Change Database. Available at: http://www.cadth.ca/en/resources/rx-for-change. Accessed December 1, 2012.
7. 7 Shea, B.J., Grimshaw, J.M., Wells, G.A., et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 7, 2007, 10.
8. 8 Cheung, A., Weir, M., Mayhew, A., et al. Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior. Syst Rev, 1, 2012, 36.
9. 9 Walsh, J., McDonald, K.M., Shojania, K.G., et al. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 3: Hypertension Care). Technical Reviews, No. 9.3. January 2005, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43920/ Accessed December 1, 2012.
10. 10 Lu, C.Y., Ross-Degnan, D., Soumerai, S.B., et al. Interventions designed to improve the quality and efficiency of medication use in managed care: a critical review of the literature - 2001-2007. BMC Health Serv Res, 8, 2008, 75.
11. 11 Ostini, R., Hegney, D., Jackson, C., et al. Systematic review of interventions to improve prescribing. Ann Pharmacother 43 (2009), 502–513.
12. 12 Pearson, S.A., Ross-Degnan, D., Payson, A., et al. Changing medication use in managed care: a critical review of the available evidence. Am J Manag Care 9 (2003), 715–731.
13. 13 Weingarten, S.R., Henning, J.M., Badamgarav, E., et al. Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ, 325, 2002, 925.
14. 14 Bryan, C., Boren, S.A., The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature. Inform Prim Care. 16 (2008), 79–91.
15. 15 Damiani, G., Pinnarelli, L., Colosimo, S.C., et al. The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res, 10, 2010, 2.
16. 16 Heselmans, A., Van de Velde, S., Donceel, P., et al. Effectiveness of electronic guideline-based implementation systems in ambulatory care settings - a systematic review. Implement Sci, 4, 2009, 82.
17. 17 Robertson, J., Walkom, E., Pearson, S.A., et al. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract 18 (2010), 69–87.
18. 18 Roshanov, P.S., Misra, S., Gerstein, H.C., et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci, 6, 2011, 92.
19. 19 Van Herck, P., De Smedt, D., Annemans, L., et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res, 10, 2010, 247.
20. 20 Bright, T.J., Wong, A., Dhurjati, R., et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 157 (2012), 29–43.
21. 21 O'Brien, M.A., Rogers, S., Jamtvedt, G., et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4), 2007, CD000409.
22. 22 Sahota, N., Lloyd, R., Ramakrishna, A., et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci, 6, 2011, 91.
23. 23 Siddiqi, K., Newell, J., Robinson, M., Getting evidence into practice: what works in developing countries?. Int J Qual Health Care 17 (2005), 447–454.
24. 24 Tooher, R., Middleton, P., Pham, C., et al. A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann Surg 241 (2005), 397–415.
25. 25 Cortoos, P.J., Simoens, S., Peetermans, W., et al. Implementing a hospital guideline on pneumonia: a semi-quantitative review. Int J Qual Health Care 19 (2007), 358–367.
26. 26 Mauger, B., Marbella, A., Pines, E., et al. Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control 42 (2014), S274–S283.
27. 27 Caruso, D., Kerrigan, C.L., Mastanduno, M.P., et al. Improving Value-Based Care and Outcomes of Clinical Populations in an Electronic Health Record System Environment. A Technical Report. 2011, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
28. 28 Bravata, D.M., Sundaram, V., Lewis, R., et al. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 5: Asthma Care). Technical Reviews, No. 9.5. 2007, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43968/ Accessed September 18, 2016.
29. 29 Grimshaw, J.M., Thomas, R.E., MacLennan, G., et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 8 (2004), iii–iv 1–72.
30. 30 Chaillet, N., Dube, E., Dugas, M., et al. Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 108 (2006), 1234–1245.
31. 31 Lineker, S.C., Husted, J.A., Educational interventions for implementation of arthritis clinical practice guidelines in primary care: effects on health professional behavior. J Rheumatol 37 (2010), 1562–1569.
32. 32 Menon, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Kastner, M., et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 41 (2009), 1024–1032.
33. 33 Gagliardi, A.R., Alhabib, S., Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci, 10, 2015, 54.
34. 34 Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, 2012, CD000259.
35. 35 Mansell, G., Shapley, M., Jordan, J.L., et al. Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 61 (2011), e821–e835.
36. 36 Okelo, S.O., Butz, A.M., Sharma, R., et al. Interventions to Modify Health Care Provider Adherence to Asthma Guidelines. Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 95. 2013, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK144097/ Accessed September 16, 2016.
37. 37 Mahan, C.E., Spyropoulos, A.C., Venous thromboembolism prevention: a systematic review of methods to improve prophylaxis and decrease events in the hospitalized patient. Hosp Pract 38 (2010), 97–108.
38. 38 Stone, E.G., Morton, S.C., Hulscher, M.E., et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 136 (2002), 641–651.
39. 39 Collinsworth, A.W., Priest, E.L., Campbell, C.R., et al. A review of multifaceted care approaches for the prevention and mitigation of delirium in intensive care units. J Intens Care Med. 31 (2016), 127–141.
40. 40 Chaillet, N., Dumont, A., Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth 34 (2007), 53–64.
41. 41 Khunpradit, S., Tavender, E., Lumbiganon, P., et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, CD005528.
42. 42 Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C.A., Balas, E.A., et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ, 330, 2005, 765.
43. 43 Nieuwlaat, R., Connolly, S.J., Mackay, J.A., et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci, 6, 2011, 90.
44. 44 Tan, K., Dear, P.R., Newell, S.J., Clinical decision support systems for neonatal care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, 2005, CD004211.
45. 45 Jeffery, R., Iserman, E., Haynes, R.B., CDSS Systematic Review Team. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 30 (2013), 739–745.
46. 46 Scott, A., Sivey, P., Ait Ouakrim, D., et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, 2011, CD008451.
47. 47 Carlsen, B., Glenton, C., Pope, C., Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. Br J Gen Pract 57 (2007), 971–978.
48. 48 Francke, A.L., Smit, M.C., de Veer, A.J., et al. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 8, 2008, 38.
49. 49 Schunemann, H.J., Cook, D., Grimshaw, J., et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: from evidence to application: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 126 (2004), 688S–696S.
50. 50 Simpson, S.H., Marrie, T.J., Majumdar, S.R., Do guidelines guide pneumonia practice? A systematic review of interventions and barriers to best practice in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. Respir Care Clin N Am 11 (2005), 1–13.
51. 51 Salam, R.A., Lassi, Z.S., Das, J.K., et al. Evidence from district level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reprod Health, 11(Suppl 2), 2014, S3.
52. 52 Dulko, D., Audit and feedback as a clinical practice guideline implementation strategy: a model for acute care nurse practitioners. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 4:Suppl 2 (2007), 200–209.
53. 53 Grimshaw, J.M., Shirran, L., Thomas, R., et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 39:Suppl 2 (2001), II2–II45.
54. 54 Grindrod, K.A., Patel, P., Martin, J.E., What interventions should pharmacists employ to impact health practitioners’ prescribing practices?. Ann Pharmacother 40 (2006), 1546–1557.
55. 55 Jamtvedt, G., Young, J.M., Kristoffersen, D.T., et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, 2006, CD000259.
56. 56 Brouwers, M.C., Garcia, K., Makarski, J., et al. The landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: what do we know and where to next? A review of systematic reviews. Implement Sci, 6, 2011, 130.