Erratum: Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans (Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2016) 11(12) (2120–2128) (S1556086416306001) (10.1016/j.jtho.2016.07.002));Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2120-2128

  Hawkins, Samuel ^a   Wang, Hua ^b,c   Liu, Ying ^b,c   Garcia, Alberto ^c   Stringfield, Olya ^c   Krewer, Henry ^a   Li, Qian ^b,c   Cherezov, Dmitry ^a   Gatenby, Robert A ^c   Balagurunathan, Yoganand ^c   Goldgof, Dmitry ^a   Schabath, Matthew B ^c   Hall, Lawrence ^a   Gillies, Robert J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Lung cancer; Machine learning; Prediction; Radiomics; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85010817811     PISSN: 15560864     EISSN: 15561380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1959     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2015.
2. American Cancer Society. Global Cancer Facts & Figures. 2d ed. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011.
3. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, , et al. Reduced lungcancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395-409.
4. Gopal M, Abdullah SE, Grady JJ, , et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: systematic review meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1233-1239.
5. Manser R, Lethaby A, Irving LB, , et al. Screening for lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD001991.
6. Patz EF Jr, Pinsky P, Gatsonis C, , et al. Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:269-274.
7. National Cancer Institute. Cancer data access system. https://biometry.nci.nih.gov/cdas/nlst/. Accessed December 15, 2014.
8. Schabath MB, Massion PP, Thompson ZJ, , et al. Survival of patients with incident lung cancer following screening by computed tomography in the National Lung Screening Trial [abstract]. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3250.
9. Cancer Imaging Archive. TCIA collections. http://www. cancerimagingarchive.net. Accessed March 24, 2016.
10. Gu Y, Kumar V, Hall LO, , et al. Automated delineation of lung tumors from ct images using a single click ensemble segmentation approach. Pattern Recognit. 2013;46: 692-702.
11. Balagurunathan Y, Kumar V, Gu Y, , et al. Test-retest reproducibility analysis of lung CT image features. J Digit Imaging. 2014;27:805-823.
12. Balagurunathan Y, Gu Y, Wang H, , et al. Reproducibility, prognosis of quantitative features extracted from CT images. Transl Oncol. 2014:72-87.
13. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, , et al. The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2009;11:10-18.
14. Quinlan JR. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1993.
15. Cohen WW. Fast effective rule induction. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1995: 115-123.
16. John GH, Langley P. Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. In: UAI'95: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1995:338-345.
17. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning. 1995;20:273-297.
18. Chang C-C, Lin C-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems, Technology. 2011;2(27):1-27.
19. Banfield RE, Hall LO, Bowyer KW, , et al. A comparison of decision tree ensemble creation techniques. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, Machine Intelligence. 2007;29:173-180.
20. Kira K, Rendell LA. A practical approach to feature selection. In: Sleeman D, Edwards P, eds. ML92: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1992:249-256.
21. Kononenko I. Estimating attributes: analysis, extensions of RELIEF. In: ECML-94: Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1994:171-182.
22. Robnik-Sikonja M, Kononenko I. An adaptation of relief for attribute estimation in regression. In: Fisher DH, ed. ICML'97: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1997:296-304.
23. Hall MA. Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning, computer science. Hamilton, New Zealand: The Unversity of Waikato; 1999.
24. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines for patients: lung cancer screening. https://www. nccn.org/patients/guidelines/lung-screening/index. html. Accessed January 28, 2016.
25. American College of Radiology. Lung-RADS version 1.0 assessment categories. http://www.acr.org/w/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Lung RADS/AssessmentCategories.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2016.
26. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278: 563-577.
27. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin. 1945:80-83.
28. Alpaydm E. Combined 52 cv F test for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation. 1999;1:1885-1892.
29. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning. 1996;24:123-140.
30. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, , et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:910-919.
31. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. 1947;12:153-157.
32. Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W, , et al. Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med. 2015;62:485-491.
33. Sozzi G, Boeri M, Rossi M, , et al. Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:768-773.