Using author-specified keywords in building an initial reading list of research papers in scientific paper retrieval and recommender systems

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 577-594

  Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind ^a   Foo, Schubert ^a   Pang, Natalie ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Author specified keywords; Digital libraries; Literature review; Reading list; Scientific paper information retrieval; Scientific paper recommender systems

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE FILTERING; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; GRAPH ALGORITHMS; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

AUTHOR-SPECIFIED KEYWORDS; CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; EVALUATION MEASURES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; OFFLINE EVALUATION; READING LIST; SCIENTIFIC PAPERS; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 85010644704     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Al-Maskari, A., Sanderson, M., A review of factors influencing user satisfaction in information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61:5 (2010), 859–868 Published http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21300.
2. Amolochitis, E., Christou, I.T., Tan, Z.-H., Prasad, R., A heuristic hierarchical scheme for academic search and retrieval. Information Processing and Management 49:6 (2013), 1326–1343 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.002.
3. AnyStyle, AnyStyle.io. 2015 Retrieved July 22, 2015, from http://anystyle.io/.
4. Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtio, A., Ruotsalo, T., Jacucci, G., Information-seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50:1 (2013), 1–11 http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001041.
5. Bae, D.-H., Hwang, S.-M., Kim, S.-W., Faloutsos, C., On constructing seminal paper genealogy. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 44:1 (2014), 54–65 http://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2013.2246565.
6. Bates, M.J., The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review 13:5 (1989), 407–424.
7. Beel, J., Genzmehr, M., Langer, S., Nürnberger, A., Gipp, B., A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation. Proceedings of the international workshop on reproducibility and replication in recommender systems evaluation - RepSys'13, 2013, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 7–14 http://doi.org/10.1145/2532508.2532511.
8. Beel, J., Gipp, B., Google scholar's ranking algorithm: The impact of citation counts (An empirical study). Third international conference on research challenges in information science, 2009. RCIS 2009, 2009, 439–446 http://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2009.5089308.
9. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., Vermetten, Y., Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior 21:3 (2005), 487–508.
10. Bullock, S.M., Using digital technologies to support Self-Directed Learning for preservice teacher education. Curriculum Journal 24:1 (2013), 103–120 http://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744695.
11. Castells, P., Vargas, S., Wang, J., Novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems: Choice, discovery and relevance. Proceedings of international workshop on diversity in document retrieval (DDR), 2009, 29–37 Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10486/666094.
12. Chen, C.-H., Mayanglambam, S.D., Hsu, F.-Y., Lu, C.-Y., Lee, H.-M., Ho, J.-M., Novelty paper recommendation using citation authority diffusion. Technologies and applications of artificial intelligence (TAAI), 2011 international conference on, 2011, IEEE, 126–131 http://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2011.29.
13. Collins, Definition of “reading list”. Collins english dictionary, 2016 Retrieved February 18, 2016, from http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/reading-list.
14. Du, J.T., Evans, N., Academic users’ information searching on research topics: Characteristics of research tasks and search strategies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 37:4 (2011), 299–306 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.04.003.
15. Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Naor, M., Sivakumar, D., Rank aggregation methods for the web. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, 2001, 613–622 http://doi.org/10.1145/371920.372165.
16. Ekstrand, M.D., Kannan, P., Stemper, J.A., Butler, J.T., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.T., Automatically building research reading lists. Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems, 2010, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 159–166 http://doi.org/10.1145/1864708.1864740.
17. Ellis, D., Cox, D., Hall, K., A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation 49:4 (1993), 356–369 http://doi.org/10.1108/eb026919.
18. Ellis, D., Haugan, M., Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation 53:4 (1997), 384–403 Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=864058&show=abstract.
19. Feng, M.-H., Chan, K.-H., Chen, H.-Y., Tsai, M.-F., Yeh, M.-Y., Lin, S.-D., An efficient solution to reinforce paper ranking using author/venue/citation information - The winner's solution for WSDM Cup 2016. Proceedings of the WSDM Cup 2016 - Entity ranking challenge workshop, 2016 Retrieved from https://doc.co/LLcDRM.
20. Fidel, R., Human information interaction: An ecological approach to information behavior. 2012, MIT Press.
21. Giles, C.L., Bollacker, K.D., Lawrence, S., CiteSeer: An automatic citation indexing system. Proceedings of the third ACM conference on digital libraries, 1998, 89–98 http://doi.org/10.1145/276675.276685.
22. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.M., Terry, D., Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM 35:12 (1992), 61–70.
23. Goodhue, D.L., Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science 41:12 (1995), 1827–1844 http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.12.1827.
24. Hjørland, B., Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management 49:6 (2013), 1313–1325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001.
25. Huang, W., Wu, Z., Mitra, P., Giles, C.L., RefSeer : A citation recommendation system. Digital libraries (JCDL), 2014 IEEE/ACM joint conference on, 2014, 371–374.
26. Jardine, J.G., Automatically generating reading lists. 2014 Retrieved from https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-848.pdf.
27. Jardine, J., Teufel, S., Topical PageRank : A model of scientific expertise for bibliographic search. Proceedings of the 14th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, 2014, 501–510 Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/old_anthology/E/E14/E14-1.pdf#page=527.
28. Jesson, J., Matheson, L., Lacey, F.M., Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. 2011, SAGE Publications Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LUhdBAAAQBAJ&pgis=1.
29. Jones, K.S., Walker, S., Robertson, S.E., A probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and comparative experiments: Part 2. Information Processing & Management 36:6 (2000), 809–840 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00016-9.
30. Karlsson, L., Koivula, L., Ruokonen, I., Kajaani, P., Antikainen, L., Ruismäki, H., From novice to expert: Information seeking processes of university students and researchers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 45 (2012), 577–587 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.595.
31. Kim, Y., Seo, J., Croft, W.B., Smith, D.A., Automatic suggestion of phrasal-concept queries for literature search. Information Processing and Management 50:4 (2014), 568–583 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.03.003.
32. Kleinberg, J.M., Hubs, authorities, and communities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 31(4), 1999 10.1145/345966.345982 Article No. 5.
33. Küçüktunç, O., Saule, E., Kaya, K., Çatalyürek, Ü.V., Diversifying citation recommendations. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 5(4), 2015 55:1–55:21 http://doi.org/10.1145/2668106.
34. Lawrence, S., Lee Giles, C., Bollacker, K., Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing. Computer 32:6 (1999), 67–71 http://doi.org/.1109/2.769447.
35. Leedy, P.D., Ormrod, J.E., Practical research: Planning and design. 2005, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J Retrieved from https://books.google.com.sg/books/about/Practical_Research.html?id=MipiQgAACAAJ&pgis=1.
36. Lehmann, S., Lautrup, B., Jackson, A.D., Citation networks in high energy Physics. Physical Review E, 68(2), 2003 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026113.
37. Levy, Y., Ellis, T.J., A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science: International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 9:1 (2006), 181–212 Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol9/V9p181-212Levy99.pdf.
38. Liu, Y., Lin, Y., Supervised HITS algorithm for MEDLINE citation ranking. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and bioengineering, BIBE, 2007, 1323–1327 http://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2007.4375740.
39. Markauskaite, L., Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: The main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities. Educational Technology Research and Development 55:6 (2007), 547–572 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9043-8.
40. Mcnee, S.M., Meeting user information needs in recommender systems., 2006, Proquest.
41. Merton, R.K., The Matthew effect in science. Science, 1968 http://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
42. Niu, X., Hemminger, B.M., A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63:2 (2012), 336–353.
43. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwami, R., Winograd, T., The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. 1999 Retrieved from http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/1/1999-66.pdf.
44. Pihur, V., Datta, S., RankAggreg, an R package for weighted rank aggregation. BMC Bioinformatics, 2009 Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/62.
45. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Introduction to recommender systems handbook. 2011, Springer, US Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/.
46. Ridley, D., The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. 2012, Sage.
47. Runelöv, M., Finding seminal scientific publications with graph mining finding seminal scientific publications with graph mining. 2015, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:847503/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
48. Salton, G., Buckley, C., Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management 24:5 (1988), 513–523 http://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0.
49. Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Foo, S., Pang, N., Comparison of techniques for measuring research coverage of scientific papers: A case study. The tenth international conference on digital information management (ICDIM), 2015, 132–137 http://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2015.7381881.
50. Singh, A.P., Shubhankar, K., Pudi, V., An efficient algorithm for ranking research papers based on citation network. 2011 3rd Conference on data mining and optimization (DMO), 2011, 88–95 http://doi.org/10.1109/DMO.2011.5976510.
51. Spezi, V., Is information-seeking behavior of doctoral students changing?: A review of the literature (2010–2015). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 2016, 1–29 http://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1127831.
52. Strohman, T., Croft, W.B., Jensen, D., Recommending citations for academic papers. Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR'07, 2007, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 705 http://doi.org/10.1145/1277741.1277868.
53. Tabatabai, D., Shore, B.M., How experts and novices search the Web. Library & Information Science Research 27:2 (2005), 222–248 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.005.
54. Vakkari, P., A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation 57:1 (2001), 44–60 http://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007075.
55. Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van Dijk, J.A.G.M., Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers 21:5 (2009), 393–402 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.005.
56. Waltman, L., Yan, E., Measuring scholarly impact. Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, 2014, Springer, 285–320 http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8.
57. Wang, Y., Zhai, E., Hu, J., Chen, Z., Claper: Recommend classical papers to beginners. 2010 Seventh international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD 2010), 2010, IEEE, 2777–2781 http://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2010.5569227.
58. White, H.D., Griffith, B.C., Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32:3 (1981), 163–171.
59. Yang, S., Han, R., Breadth and depth of citation distribution. Information Processing and Management 51:2 (2015), 130–140 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.12.003.
60. Yoo, I., Mosa, A.S.M., Analysis of PubMed user sessions using a full-day PubMed query log: A comparison of experienced and nonexperienced PubMed users. JMIR Medical Informatics, 3(3), 2015 http://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.3740.
61. Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., Vellino, A., Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66:2 (2015), 408–427 http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23179.