Measuring Trust in the Press in a Changing Media Environment

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 76-85

  Daniller, Andrew ^a   Allen, Douglas ^a   Tallevi, Ashley ^b   Mutz, Diana C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010644374     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1271113     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S., (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72. doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.67
2. Dilliplane, S., (2011). All the news you want to hear:The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 287–316. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr006
3. Dilliplane, S., (2014). Activation, conversion, or reinforcement? The impact of partisan news exposure on vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 79–94. doi:10.1111/ajps.12046
4. Fenno, R. F., Jr., (1975). If, as Ralph Nader says, Congress is “the broken branch,” how come we love our congressmen so much? In N. J., Ornstein (Ed.), Congress in change:Evolution and reform (pp. 277–287). New York, NY:Praeger.
5. Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K., (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462. doi:10.1177/107769908606300301
6. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M., (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr044
7. Goldman, S., & Mutz, D. C., (2011). The friendly media phenomenon:A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42–66. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
8. Gunther, A. C., (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147–167. doi:10.1086/269308
9. Iyengar, S., (1990). The accessibility bias in politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2(1), 1–15. doi:10.1093/ijpor/2.1.1
10. Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y., (1994). Questioning the conventional wisdom on public opinion toward health reform. PS:Political Science and Politics, 27(2), 208–214.
11. Kohring, M., & Matthes, J., (2007). Trust in news media:Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34(2), 231–252. doi:10.1177/0093650206298071
12. Ladd, J. M., (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
13. Major, B., (1982). Individual differences in what is seen as fair. Paper presented at the Nags Head Conference on Psychological Aspects of Justice, Kill Devil Hills, NC.
14. Mutz, D. C., & Flemming, G., (1999). How good people make bad collectives:A social-psychological perspective on public attitudes toward Congress. In J., Cooper (Ed.), Congress and the decline of public trust (pp. 79–100). Boulder, CO:Westview.
15. Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., & Lambert, A. J., (2005). Attitudes as accessibility bias:Dissociating automatic and controlled processes. In R. R., Hassin, J. S., Uleman, & J. A., Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 393–420). New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
16. Perloff, R. M., (2002). The third-person effect. In J., Bryant, & D., Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects:Advances in theory and research (pp. 489–506). Mahweh, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E., (1979). An alternative conceptualization of political tolerance:Illusory increases 1950s–1970s. American Political Science Review, 73(3), 781–794. doi:10.2307/1955404
18. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S., (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution:Top of the head phenomena. In L., Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 249–288). New York, NY:Academic Press.
19. Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A., (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
20. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K., (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
21. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D., (1973). Availability:A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
22. Tyler, T. R., & Cook, F. L., (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk:Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 693–708. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.693
23. Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B., (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation:Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56. doi:10.1111/jcom.2012.62.issue-1