메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 267-281

The Weights of Evidence

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85010635736     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/E1742360008000385     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (13)

References (25)
  • 2
    • 84960609940 scopus 로고
    • Twelve Questions about Keynes's Concept of Weight
    • Cohen L. Jonathan. 1985. “Twelve Questions about Keynes's Concept of Weight.” British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 37: 263–78.
    • (1985) British Journal of the Philosophy of Science , vol.37 , pp. 263-278
    • Cohen, L.J.1
  • 3
    • 1542570088 scopus 로고
    • The Role of Evidential Weight in Criminal Proof
    • Cohen L. Jonathan. 1986. “The Role of Evidential Weight in Criminal Proof.” Boston University Law Review 66: 635–49.
    • (1986) Boston University Law Review , vol.66 , pp. 635-649
    • Cohen, L.J.1
  • 4
    • 0010840192 scopus 로고
    • Confidence in Probability: Burdens of Persuasion in a World of Imperfect Knowledge
    • Cohen Neil B. 1985. “Confidence in Probability: Burdens of Persuasion in a World of Imperfect Knowledge.” New York University Law Review 60: 385–422.
    • (1985) New York University Law Review , vol.60 , pp. 385-422
    • Cohen, N.B.1
  • 5
    • 85010645762 scopus 로고
    • Conceptualizing Proof and Calculating Probabilities: A Response to Professor Kaye
    • Cohen Neil B. 1987. “Conceptualizing Proof and Calculating Probabilities: A Response to Professor Kaye.” Cornell Law Review 73: 78–95.
    • (1987) Cornell Law Review , vol.73 , pp. 78-95
    • Cohen, N.B.1
  • 6
    • 0346444106 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dealing with Evidentiary Deficiency
    • Friedman Richard D. 1997. “Dealing with Evidentiary Deficiency.” Cardozo Law Review 18: 1961–86.
    • (1997) Cardozo Law Review , vol.18 , pp. 1961-1986
    • Friedman, R.D.1
  • 10
    • 13844300415 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On the Proof Dynamics of Inference to the Best Explanation
    • Josephson John R. 2001. “On the Proof Dynamics of Inference to the Best Explanation.” Cardozo Law Review 22: 1621–43.
    • (2001) Cardozo Law Review , vol.22 , pp. 1621-1643
    • Josephson, J.R.1
  • 11
    • 0003460554 scopus 로고
    • Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process
    • Kaplan John. 1968. “Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process.” Stanford Law Review 20: 1065–92.
    • (1968) Stanford Law Review , vol.20 , pp. 1065-1092
    • Kaplan, J.1
  • 12
    • 78649971227 scopus 로고
    • Do We Need a Calculus of Weight to Understand Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?
    • Kaye David H. 1986. “Do We Need a Calculus of Weight to Understand Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?” Boston University Law Review 66: 657–72.
    • (1986) Boston University Law Review , vol.66 , pp. 657-672
    • Kaye, D.H.1
  • 13
    • 0346894804 scopus 로고
    • Apples and Oranges: Confidence Coefficients and the Burden of Persuasion
    • Kaye David H. 1987. “Apples and Oranges: Confidence Coefficients and the Burden of Persuasion.” Cornell Law Review 73: 54–77.
    • (1987) Cornell Law Review , vol.73 , pp. 54-77
    • Kaye, D.H.1
  • 15
    • 0012464729 scopus 로고
    • Modeling Relevance
    • Lempert Richard O. 1977. “Modeling Relevance.” Michigan Law Review 75: 1021–57.
    • (1977) Michigan Law Review , vol.75 , pp. 1021-1057
    • Lempert, R.O.1
  • 16
    • 33845610163 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recasting Reasonable Doubt: Decision Theory and the Virtues of Variability
    • Lillquist Erik. 2002. “Recasting Reasonable Doubt: Decision Theory and the Virtues of Variability.” U.C. Davis Law Review 36: 85–197.
    • (2002) U.C. Davis Law Review , vol.36 , pp. 85-197
    • Lillquist, E.1
  • 17
    • 77955259296 scopus 로고
    • Missing Evidence
    • Nance Dale A. 1991. “Missing Evidence.” Cardozo Law Review 13: 831–82.
    • (1991) Cardozo Law Review , vol.13 , pp. 831-882
    • Nance, D.A.1
  • 18
    • 0346615757 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidential Completeness and the Burden of Proof
    • Nance Dale A. 1998. “Evidential Completeness and the Burden of Proof.” Hastings Law Journal 49: 621–62.
    • (1998) Hastings Law Journal , vol.49 , pp. 621-662
    • Nance, D.A.1
  • 19
    • 85010659520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Allocating the Risk of Error: Its Role in the Theory of Evidence Law
    • Nance Dale A. 2005. “Allocating the Risk of Error: Its Role in the Theory of Evidence Law.” Legal Theory 13: 129–64.
    • (2005) Legal Theory , vol.13 , pp. 129-164
    • Nance, D.A.1
  • 20
    • 0000217148 scopus 로고
    • A Cognitive Model of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model
    • Pennington Nancy & Reid Hastie. 1991. “A Cognitive Model of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model.” Cardozo Law Review 13: 519–57.
    • (1991) Cardozo Law Review , vol.13 , pp. 519-557
    • Pennington, N.1    Reid, H.2
  • 24
    • 0004310406 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (gen. ed.), 6th ed., St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group
    • Strong John W. (gen. ed.) 2006. McCormick on Evidence. 6th ed. Vol. II. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group.
    • (2006) McCormick on Evidence , vol.2
    • Strong, J.W.1
  • 25
    • 33947259562 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preponderance, Probability, and Warranted Factfinding
    • Walker Vern R. 1996. “Preponderance, Probability, and Warranted Factfinding.” Brooklyn Law Review 62: 1075–136.
    • (1996) Brooklyn Law Review , vol.62 , pp. 1075-1136
    • Walker, V.R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.