Haciendo que hacer - cultivating a mestiza worldview and academic achievement: Braiding cultural knowledge into educational research, policy, practice

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 641-656

  González, Francisca E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010568216     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390110059847     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alarcón, N. A. (1990). Chicana feminism: In the tracks of the native woman. Cultural Studies, 4(3), 248-255.
2. Allen, P. G. (1998). Off the reservation: Reflections on bouTidary-busting border-crossing loose canons. Boston: Beacon Press.
3. Almeida, D. A. (1998). Indigenous education: Survival for our children. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(1), 6-10.
4. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinters/Aunt Lute.
5. Chabram-Dernersesian, A. (1994). Chicana? Rican? No, Chicana-Riquena? Refashioning the transnational connection. In D. T. Goldberg (Ed.), Multiculturalism: A critical reader (pp. 269-295). Cambridge: Blackwell.
6. Chabram-Dernersesian, A. (1999). En-countering the other discourse of Chicano-Mexicano Difference. Cultural Studies, 13(2), 263-289.
7. Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the Margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement, (pp. 357-383). New York: The New York Press.
8. Darder, A. (1995). The politics of biculturalism: Culture and difference in the formation of warriors for Gringostroika and the new mestizas. In A. Darder (Ed.), Culture and difference: Critical perspectives on the bicultural experience in the United States (pp. 1-20). Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey.
9. Darder, A., et al. (1997). Introduction: In A. Darder, R.D. Torres, & H. Gutierrez (Eds.), Latinos and education: A critical reader (pp. xi-xix). New York: Routledge.
10. Darder, A. &Torres, R. D. (1999). Shattering the “race” lens: Toward a critical theory of racism. In R. H. Tai & M. L. Kenyatta (Eds.), Critical ethnicity: Countering the waves of identity politics (pp. 1-4). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11. Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555-582.
12. Delgado Bernal, D. (1999). Chicana/o education from the Civil Rights era to the present. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The elusive quest for equality: 150 years of Chicana/Chicano education (pp.77-108). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
13. Department of Finance (1996). Population estimates for Sacramento County. Sacramento, CA. Demographic Research Unit, State of California.
14. DuBois, W. E. B. (1903). The souls of black folk. Illinois: A.C. McClurg.
15. Elenes, C. A. (1997). Reclaiming the borderlands: Chicana/o identity, difference, and critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 47(3), 359-375.
16. Elenes, C. A. (1999). Toward the construction of Chicana/o identity: Borderlands and the Educational discourses. In A. Sosa-Riddell, M. Hernández, G. San Miguel, & K. Rios (Eds.), Expanding Raza worldviews: Sexuality and regionalism (pp. 8-25). California: NACCS.
17. Erickson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities.
18. Erickson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth & crises. New York: Norton.
19. Fanon, F. (1952). Black skin. White masks. New York: Grove.
20. Fernandez, M. E. (1998). Bars and belongin. In G. Leclerc, R. Villa & M. J. Dear (Eds.), La Vida Latina en L.A. urban latino cultures (pp. 35-43). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
21. Flores-Ortiz, Y. (1997). Voices from the couch: The co-construction of a Chicana Psychology. In C. M. Trujillo (Ed.), Living Chicana theory (pp. 102-122). Berkeley: Third Woman Press.
22. Gegeo, D. W. & K. Watson-Gegeo.(2000). “How we know”: Kwara’ae rural villagers doing indigenous epistemology. Under review with The Contemporary Pacific.
23. González , F. E. (1995a). For the love of Chicana girls: Feminist perspectives and Chicana education. Qualifying Examination, University of California, Davis.
24. González , F. E. (1995b). Soaring to new perspectives: Chicana adolescent identity formations. Qualifying Examination, University of California, Davis.
25. González , F. E. (1998a). Formations of Mexicananess: Trenzas de identidades multiples Growing up Mexicana: Braids of multiple identities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 81-102.
26. González , F. E. (1998b). The formations of Mexicananess: Trenzas de Identidades Multiples The Development of womanhood among young Mexicanas: Braids of multiple identities. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Davis.
27. Goodenow, C. & Espin, O. (1993). Identity choices in immigrant adolescent females. Adolescence, 28(1), 173-184.
28. Hernández-Truyol, B. E. (1997). Borders (en)gendered: Normativities, Latinas and a LatCrit paradigm. New York University Law Redew, 72(4), 882-927.
29. Hernández-Truyol, B. E. (1998). Bringing international human rights home. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), The Latino condition: A critical reader (pp. 381-386). New York: New York University Press.
30. Hidalgo, N. (1998). Toward a definition of a Latino family research paradigm. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 103-120.
31. Johnson, K. R. (1997). The new nativism: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue. In J. F. Perea (Ed.), Immigrants out! The new natidsm and the anti-immigran impulse in the United States (pp. 165-189). New York: New York University Press.
32. Johnson, K. R. (1998). The intersection of immigration status, ethnicity, gender, and class. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), The Latino condition: A critical reader (pp. 376-380). New York: New York University Press.
33. Johnson, K. R. & Martinez, G. A. (2000). Discrimination by proxy: The case of Proposition 227 and the ban on bilingual education. U.C. Davis Law Redew 33(4), 1227-1276.
34. Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). For colored girls who have considered suicide when the academy’s not enough: reflections of an African American woman scholar. In A. Neumann, & P. L. Peterson (Eds.), Learning from our lives: women, research, and autobiography in education, (pp. 52-70). New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Ladson-Billings, G. (1999).Just what is critical race theory? In L. Parker, D. Deyhle, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Race is… race isn’t: Critical race theory and qualitative studies in education (pp. 7-30). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
36. Lagemann, E. C. (1997). Contested terrain: A history of education research in the United States, 1890-1990. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 5-17.
37. Lockwood, A. T. & Secada, W. G. (1999). Tranfoming education for Hispanic youth. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
38. Lorde, A. (1993). The uses of the erotic: The erotic as power. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 339-343). New York: Routledge.
39. Males, M. & Macallair, D. (1999). The color of justice: An analysis of juvenile adult, court transfers in California. Washington, DC: Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice.
40. Matsuda, M. (1995). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 63-97). New York: New Press.
41. Meyer, M. A. (1998). Native Hawaiian epistemology: Sites of empowerment and resistance. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(1), 22-28.
42. Montoya, M. E. (1994). Mascaras, trenzas, y grenas: Un/masking the self while un/braiding Latina stories and legal discourse. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 17(1), 185-220.
43. Montoya, M. E. (1999). Mascaras, trenzas, y grenas: Un/masking the self while un/braiding Latina stories and legal discourse. In D. L. Galindo & M.D. Gonzales (Eds.), Speaking Chicana: Voice, power, and identity (pp. 194-211). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
44. Moraga, C. (1983). La guera. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldiia (Eds.), This bridge called my back: writings by radical women of color (pp. 27-34). New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
45. Mussen, P. H. et al. (1974). Child development and personality, 4th ed. New York: Harper & Row.
46. Pardo, M. (1998). Mexican American women activists: identity and resisterne in two Los Angeles communities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
47. Pérez, L. E. (1993). Opposition and the education of Chicana/os. In C. McCarthy & W. Crichlow (Eds.), Race identity and representation in education (pp. 268-279). New York: Routledge.
48. Pérez, L. E. (1998). Spirit glyphs: Reimagining art and artists in the world of Chicana tlamatinime. Modern Fiction Studies, 44(1), 36-76.
49. Pérez, L. E. (1999). El desorden, nationalism, and Chicana/o aesthetics. In N. Alarcón, C. Kaplan, & M. Moalem (Eds.), Between woman and nation: Transnational feminisms and the state (pp. 19-46). North Carolina: Duke University Press.
50. President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. (1996). Our nation on the fault line: Hispanic American education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51. Quintana, A. (1996). Home girls: chicana literary voices. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
52. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture & truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
53. Ruiz, V. L. (1993). “Star Struck” acculturation, adolescence, and the Mexican American woman, 1920-1950. In A. de la Torre, & B. M. Pesquera (Eds.), Building with our hands: new directions in Chicana Studies, (pp. 17-69). Berkeley: Third Woman Press.
54. Ruiz, V. L. (1998). From out of the shadows: Mexican women in twentieth-century America. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Sandoval, C. (1991). Feminist theory under postmodern conditions: To a theory of oppositional consciousness. Sub/Versions, 1,1-6.
56. Sandoval, C. (1998). Mestizaje as method: Feminists of color challenge the canon. In C. Trujillo (Ed.), Living Chicana theory (pp. 352-370). Berkeley: Third Woman Press.
57. San Miguel Jr., G. (1999). The schooling Mexicanosin the Southwest, 1848-1891. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The elusive quest for equality: 150 years of Chicana/Chicano education (pp.31-51). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
58. Sherraden, M. S., & Barrera, R. E. (1995). Qualitative research with an understudied population: In-depth interviews with women of Mexican descent. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17(2), 452-470.
59. Silko, L. M. (1996). Yellow woman and a beauty of the spirit: Essays on Native American life today. New York: Touchtone.
60. Sisson, L. A. et al. (1987). Historical perspectives. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 3-10). New York: Pergamon Press.
61. Swartz, E. (1992). Emancipatory narratives: rewriting the master script in the school curriculum. Journal of Negro Education, 61(3), 341-355.
62. Tai, R. H. & Kenyatta, M. L. (1999). Introduction. In R. H. Tai & M. L. Kenyatta (Eds.), Critical ethnicity: Counteringthe waves of identity politics (pp. 1-4). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
63. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York: State University of New York Press.
64. Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and cooptation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711-731.
65. Villenas, S. (2000). This ethnography called my back: Writings of the exotic gaze, “othering” Latina, and recuperating Xicanisma. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 74-95). New York: Routledge.
66. Villenas, S., & Deyhle, D. (1999). Critical Race Theory and Ethnographies Challenging the Stereotypes: Latino Families, Schooling, Resilience and Resistance. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(4), 413-445.
67. Yarbro-Bejarano, Y. (1999). Sexuality and Chicana/o studies: Toward a theoretical paradigm for the twenty-first century. Cultural Studies, 13(2), 335-345.