Transformando fronteras: Chicana feminist transformative pedagogies

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 689-702

  Elenes, C Alejandra ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010538940     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390110059865     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alarcón, N. (1990a). Chicana feminism: In the tracks of “the” Native woman. Cultural Studies, 4, 248-256.
2. Alarcón, N. (1990b). The theoretical subject(s) of This bridge called my back and Anglo-American feminism. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul: Haciendo caras (pp. 356-369). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
3. Althusser, L. (1970). For Marx (B. Brewster, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
4. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
5. Anzaldúa, G. (1990). Haciendo caras, una entrada: An introduction by Gloria Anzaldúa. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.) Making face, making soul: Haciendo caras (pp. xv-xxviii). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
6. Davis, A. (1981). Women, race and class. New York: Vintage Books.
7. Connolly, W. E. (1991). Identity/difference. London: Cornell University Press.
8. Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555-582.
9. Delgado Bernal, D. (2000). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London and New York: Verso.
12. Elenes, C. A. (1997). Reclaiming the borderlands: Chicana/o identity, difference, and critical pedagogy. Educational Theory, 47(3), 359-375.
13. Elenes, C. A. (1999). Toward the construction of Chicana/o identity: Borderlands and the educational discourses. In A. Sosa-Riddell, M. J. Hernández, & L. San Miguel (Eds.), Expanding raza world views: sexuality and regonalism (pp. 8-25). National Association for Chicana and Chicano Studies.
14. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 297-324.
15. Ellsworth, E. (1996). Situated response-ability to student papers. Theory into Practice, 35(2), 138-143.
16. González , F. (2000). Haciendo que hacer: Cultivating a Mestiza worldview and academic achievement: Braiding cultural knowledge into educational research, policy, and practice. Unpublished manuscript.
17. Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses and the regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
18. Grossberg, L. (1997). Bringing it all back home: essays on cultural studies. Durham: Duke University Press. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the pradice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
19. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
20. Lowe, L. (1997). Work, immigration, gender and Asian “American” women. In E. H. Kim, L. A. Villaneuva, & Asian Women United of California (Eds.), Making More Waves: New Wrtings by Asian American Women (pp. 269-277). Boston: Beacon Press.
21. Mohanty, C. T. (1997). Defining genealogies: Feminist reflections on being South Asian in North America. In E. H. Kim, L. A. Villaneuva, & Asian Women United of California (Eds.) Makingmore waves (pp. 119-127). Boston: Beacon Press.
22. Nadesan, M. H., & Elenes, C. A. (1998). Chantal Mouffe: pedagogy for democratic citizenship. In M. Peters (Eds.), Naming the multiple: poststructuralism and education (pp. 245-263). Wesport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
23. Nieto, S. (1998). From claiming hegemony to sharing space: Creating community in multicultural courses. In R. Chavez Chavez, & J. O’Donnell (Eds.), Speaking the unpleasant: The politics of (non) engagement in the multicultural education terrain (pp. 16-31). Albany: SUNY Press.
24. Ng, R. (1997). A woman out of control: Deconstructing sexism and racism in the university. In S. De Castell, & M. Bryson (Eds.). Radical Inferlventions: Identity, politics and difference/s in educational praxis (pp. 39-57). Albany: SUNY Press.
25. Parmar, P. (Producer/Director). (1991). A place of rage. New York: Women Make Movies.
26. Reyes, M. L. (1997). Chicanas in academe: An endangered species. In S. de Castell, & M. Bryson (Eds.), Radical In⟨ter⟩ventions: Identity, politics, and difference/s in educational praxis (pp. 15-37). Albany: SUNY Press.
27. Riggs, M. (Producer/Director). (1995). Black is… black ain’t: a personal journy through black identity. San Francisco: California Newsreel.
28. Russel R y Rodríguez, M. (1997). (En)Countering domestic violence, complicity, and definitions of Chicana womanhood. Voces: A Journal of Chicana/Latina Sudies, 1(2), 104-141.
29. Sandoval, C. (1990). A report on the 1981 National Women’s Studies Association conference. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul: Haciendo caras (pp. 55-71). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
30. Sandoval, C. (1991). U.S. Third World feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders, 10, 1-24.
31. Sandoval, C. (1998). Mestizaje as method: feminists-of-color challenge the canon. In C. Trujillo (Ed.), Living Chicana theory (pp. 352-370). Berkeley: Third Women Press.
32. Utall, L. (1990). Inclusion without influence: the continuing tokenism of women of color. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul: Haciendo cras (pp. 42-45). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
33. Williams, P. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Yarbro-Bejarano, Y. (1999). Sexuality and Chicana/o Studies: Toward a theoretical paradigm for the twenty-first century. Cultura Studies, 13, 335-345.