Is Paretian liberalism still possible? Behavioral economics and liberal paternalism;Ist paretianischer Liberalismus doch möglich? Verhaltenswissenschaftliche ökonomik und Liberaler Paternalismus

List Forum fur Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 43-58

  Beck, Hanno ^a  

^a PFORZHEIM UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010260051     PISSN: 09370862     EISSN: 23643943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03373322     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andel, N. (1984): Zum Konzept der meritorischen Güter, Finanzarchiv, Bd. 42, S. 630–648.
2. Beck, Hanno (2009): Wirtschaftspolitik und Psychologie: Zum Forschungsprogramm der Behavioral Economics, in: ORDO, Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Band 60 (2009), S. 119–151.
3. Beshears, J.; Choi, J.J.; Laibson, D.; Madrian, B.C. (2008): How are preferences revealed?, NBER Working Paper No. 13976.
4. Camerer, Collin; Issacharoff, Samuel; Loewenstein, George; O’Donoghue, Ted; Rabin, Matthew (2003): Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 151, pp. 101–144.
5. Carroll, Gabriel D.; Choi, James J.; Laibson, David; Madrian, Brigitte C.; Metrick, Andrew (2007): Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions, mimeo.
6. Choi, James J.; Laibson, David, Madrian, Brigitte, Metrick, Andrew (2002): For better of for worse: default effects and 401(k) savings behavior, Pension Research Council workig Paper No. 2, 2002.
7. Fehr, Ernst; Schmidt, Klaus M. (2005): The Economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism — ex-permiental evidence and new Theories. Discussion Paper 2005-20, Department of Economics, University Munich.
8. Frederick, Shane; Loewenstein, George; O’Donoghue, Ted (2002): Time Discounting and time preference: a critical review, in: Journal of Economic Literature, XL, pp. 351–401.
9. Gigerenzer, Gerd (1991): How to make cognitive illusions dissapear: Beyond „Heuristics and Biases“, in: European Review of Social Psychology, (1991), Vol. 2, pp. 83–115.
10. Gigerenzer, Gerd (1996): On narrow Norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996), in: Psychological Review, 103, No. 3, pp. 592–596.
11. Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter M. And The ABC Research Group (EDS.): Simple Heuristics that make us smart, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York 1999.
12. Glaeser, Edward L. (2006): Paternalism and Psychology, in: University of Chicago Law Review Vol. 73, pp. 133–156.
13. Hillinger, Claude; Lapham, Victoria (1971): The impossibility of a paertian liberal: Comment by two who are unreconstructed, in: Journal of Political Economx, Vol. 79, pp. 1403–1405.
14. Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos (1979): Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, in: Econometrica, Vol. 47, S. 263–291.
15. Kahneman, D.; Knetsch, Jack; Thaler, Richard (1991): Anomalies: The Endowment effect, Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias, in: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 193–206.
16. Knetsch, Jack L. (1989): The endowment effect and Evidence of nonreversible indifference curves, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 1277–1284.
17. Keren, G. (1987): Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: a calibration study, in: Organizational behavior und human decision (34), pp. 83–97.
18. Levin Irwin P.; Gaeth, Gary J. (1988): Framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product, in: Journal of Consumer Research, 15, pp. 374–378.
19. Murphy, A.H.; Winkler, R.L. (1974): Subjective probability forecasting experiments in meteorology: Some preliminary results, in: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (55), pp. 1206–1212.
20. Mckenzie, Craig (2004): Framing effects in inference tasks — and why they are normatively defensible, in: Memory & Cognition 32/6, pp. 874–885.
21. Mckenzie, Craig; Nelson J.D. (2003): What a speakers choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selections and framing effects, in: Psychonomic Bulletin & Revies, 10/3, pp. 596–602.
22. Mullainathan, Sendhil, Thaler, Richard (2000): Behavioral Economics. NBER Working Paper 7948, October 2000.
23. NG, Y.K. (1971): The possibility of a paretian liberal: impossibility theorems and cardianl utility, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79, pp. 1397–1402.
24. O’Donoghue, Ted; Rabin, Matthew (2003): Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a modell of sin taxes, in: American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 92(2), May 2003, pp. 186–191.
25. Pribram, Karl (1998): Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens, Erster Band, Frankfurt 1998.
26. Read, Daniel (2001), Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive?, in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23:1, pp. 5–32.
27. Rubinstein, Ariel (2003): “Economics and psychology”? The case of hyperbolic discounting, in: International Economic Review, Vol. 44 (Nov.), No. 4, pp. 1207–1216.
28. Schölten, Marc; Read, Daniel (2006): Discounting by intervalls: A generalized Model of intertemporal choice, in: Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 9 (September 2006), pp. 1424–1436.
29. Samuelson, W.; Zeckhauser, R. (1988): Status Quo Bias in Decision making, in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
30. Sen, Amartya (1970): The impossibility of a paertian liberal, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, pp. 152–157.
31. Sen, Amartya (1971): The impossibility of a paertian liberal: reply, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79, pp. 1406–1407.
32. Thaler, Richard (1980): Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 1, pp. 39–60.
33. Thaler, Richard (1981): Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency, in: Economic Letters, 8, pp. 201–207.
34. Thaler, Richard; Benartzi, Shlomo (2004): Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral Economics to increase employee saving, in: Journal of political Economy, Vol. 112 (No. 1), pp. 164–187.
35. Thaler, Richard; Sunstein, Cass R. (2003): Libertarian Paternalism, in: American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings Vol. 92 No. 2 (May 2003), pp. 175–179.
36. Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel (1981): The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, in: Science, Vol. 211 (1981), pp. 453–458.
37. Whitman, Glen (2006): Against the new Paternalism. Internalities and the Economics of Self-Control, in: Cato Institute (eds.): Policy Analysis No. 563 (February 2006).
38. Wüst, Kirsten; Beck, Hanno (2010): Rauchen, Sucht und Willensschwäche: Zeitinkonsistentes Verhalten; erscheint in: WiSt — Das Wirtschaftsstudium. Zeitschrift für Ausbildung und Hochschulkontakt. 38. Jg.