A perspective on perspectives: Methods to reduce variation in shape analysis of digitalimages

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 141, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1161-1170

  Muir, A M ^a,b   Vecsei, P ^c   Krueger, C C ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION   (United States)

^c GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010017516     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2012.685823     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric morphometries: ten years of progress following the “revolution.” Italian Journal of Zoology 71:5-16.
2. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. Cadrin, S. X. 2000. Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10:91-112.
4. Cadrin, S. X., and K. D. Friedland. 1999. The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fisheries Research (Amsterdam) 43:129-139.
5. Cardini, A., and S. Elton. 2011. GeMBiD, a geometric morphometric approach to the study of biological diversity: an example study of the red colobus (Procolobus; [Piliocolobus]) species complex. International Journal of Pri-matologyy 32:377-389.
6. Chiari, Y, B. Wang, H. Rushmeier, and A. Caccone. 2008. Using digital images to reconstruct three-dimensional biological forms: a new tool for morphological studies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95:425-436.
7. Claude, J. 2008. Morphometrics with R. Springer, New York.
8. Elder, J. 2011. Photographic reference scale. Available: http://web.ncf.ca/jim/scale/index.html. (October 2011).
9. Hillebrand, R., and H. Hauschild. 1993. Nikon compendium: handbook of the Nikon system, 2nd edition. Hove Books, East Sussex, UK.
10. Ives, A. R., P. E. Midford, and T. Garland. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Systematic Biology 56:252-270.
11. Kendall, D. 1977. The diffusion of shape. Advances in Applied Probability 9:428-430.
12. Klingenberg, C. P. 2010. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 11:623-635.
13. Klingenberg, C.P.2011. MorphoJ: anintegratedsoftware packagefor geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 11:353-357.
14. Lawing, A. M., and P. D. Polly. 2010. Geometric morphometrics: recent applications to the study of evolution and development. Journal of Zoology 280:1-7.
15. McCamy, C. S., H. Marcus, and J. G. Davidson. 1976. A color-rendition chart. Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering 2:95-99.
16. Muir, A. M., C. C. Krueger, and M. J. Hansen. 2012. Re-establishing laketroutin the Laurentian Great Lakes: past, present, and future. Pages 533-588 in W. W. Taylor and C. P. Ferreri, editors. Great Lakes fishery policy and management: a binational perspective, 2nd edition. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing.
17. Rohlf, F. J. 1993. Morphometric tools for landmark data geometry and biology. Journal of Classification 10:133-136.
18. Rohlf, F. J. 2003. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. Journal of Human Evolution 44:665-683.
19. Slice, D. E. 2007. Geometric morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:261-281.
20. Slice, D. E., F. L. Bookstein, L. F. Marcus, and F. J. Rohlf. 2009. A glossary for geometric morphometrics. State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook. Avaliable: life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/. (January 2011).
21. Valentin, A. E., X. Penin, J. P. Chanut, J. M. Sevigny, and F. J. Rohlf. 2008. Arching effect on fish body shape in geometric morphometric studies. Journal of Fish Biology 73:623-638.
22. von Cramon-Taubadel, N., B. C. Frazier, and M. M. Lahr. 2007. The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 134:24-35.
23. Warren, B. 2002. Photography, 2nd edition. Delmar Thomson Learning, Albany, New York.
24. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, D. H. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier, New York.
25. Zimmerman, M. S., C. C. Krueger, and R. L. Eshenroder. 2007. Morphological and ecological differences between shallow- and deep-water lake trout in Lake Mistassini, Quebec. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33:156-169.