The Development of Dynamic Human Reliability Analysis Simulations for Inclusion in Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization Frameworks

Procedia Manufacturing

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 1305-1311

  Joe, Jeffrey C ^a   Shirley, Rachel B ^b   Mandelli, Diego ^a   Boring, Ronald L ^a   Smith, Curtis L ^a  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic HRA; Human reliability analysis (HRA); Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization; Time reliability studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010001760     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23519789     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.278     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. [1] Smith, C., Rabiti, C., Martineau, R., Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization (RISMC) Pathway Technical Program Plan. Idaho Falls, 2011.
2. [2] Madelli, D., Smith, C., Riley, T., Nielsen, J., Schroeder, J., Rabiti, C., Alonsi, A., Kinoshita, R., Malijovec, D., Wang, B., Pascucci, V., “Overview of new tools to perform safety analysis: BWR station black out test case,” in Proceedings of PSAM 12 Conference. Honolulu, 2014.
3. [3] D. Gaston, G. Hansen and C. Newman, “MOOSE: A Parallel Computational Framework for Couples Systems for Nonlinear Equations,” in International Conference on Mathematics, Computational Methods, and Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2009.
4. [4] David, R., Gaston, D., Martineau, R., Peterson, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, H., Zou, L., RELAP-7 Level 2 Milestone Report: Demonstration of a Steady State Single Phase PWR Simulation with RELAP-7. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, 2012.
5. [5] C. R. Alfonsi, D. Mandelli, J. Cogliati and R. Kinoshita, “Raven as a tool for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Software overview,” in,” in Proceeding of M&C2013 International Topical Meeting on Mathematics and Computation, CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL, 2013.
6. [6] Mandelli, C.S., Riley, T., Schroeder, J., Rabiti, C., Alfonsi, A., Nielsen, J., Maljovec, D., Wang, B., Pascucci, V., Support and Modeling for the Boiling Water Reactor Station Black Out Case Study Using RELAP and RAVEN. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, 2013.
7. [7] Gertman, D., Blackman, H., Marble, J., Byers, J., Smith, C., The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method. NRC, 2005.
8. [8] A. Swain and H. Guttmann, “Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report. NUREG/CR-1278.,” U.S. NRC, Washington, DC, 1983.
9. [9] Electrical Power Research Institute, “An Approach to the Analysis of Operator Actions in Probabilistic Risk Assessment, TR-100259,” Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1992.
10. [10] L. Weston, D. Whitehead and N. Graves, “Recovery Actions in PRA for the Risk Methods Integration and Evaluation Program (RMIEP), Volume 1: Development of the Data-Based Method, NUREG/CR-4834 (vol. 1),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1987.
11. [11] D. Whitehead, “Recovery Actions in PRA for the Risk Methods Integration and Evaluation Program (RMIEP), Volume 2: Application of the Data-Based Method, NUREG/CR-4834 (vol. 2),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1987.
12. [12] Spurgin, A., Moieni, P., Operator Reliability Experiments Using Power Plant Simulators, Volume 3: Appendixes. EPRI, 1991.
13. [13] Papazoglou, A., Bari, R., Buslik, A., Hall, R., Ilberg, D., Samanta, P., Teichmann, T., Youngblood, R., El-Bassioni, A., Fragola, J., Lofgren, E., Vesely, W., Probabilistic Safety Analysis Procedures Guide. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 1984.
14. [14] Gertman, D., Blackman, H., Human Reliability and Safety Analysis Data Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
15. [15] Spurgin, A., Moieni, P., A human reliability analysis approach using measurements for individual plant examination. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 1989.
16. [16] “International HRA Empirical Study, Phase 1 Report: Description of Overall Approach and pilot phase results from comparing HRA methods to simulator performance data,” US NRC, 2009.
17. [17] “International HRA empirical study, Phase 2 report: results from comparing HRA method predictions to simulator data from SGTR scenarios,” US NRC, 2011.
18. [18] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “The International HRA Empirical Study: Lessons Learned from Comparing HRA Methods Predictions to HAMMLAB Simulator Data, NUREG-2127,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 2014.
19. [19] Apostolakis, G., Bier, V., Mosleh, A., A critique of current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 22:1 (1988), 201–217.
20. [20] Jae, M., Park, C., A new dynamic HRA method and its application. Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society 27 (1995), 292–300.
21. [21] Jae, M., A new dynamic reliability assessment for mid-loop operations in a nuclear power plant. International Journal of Reliability and Applications 3:1 (2002), 25–35.
22. [22] Chang, Y., Mosleh, A., Cognitive Modeling and Dynamic Probabilistic Simulation of Operating Crew Response to Complex System Accidents, Parts 1-5. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92 (2007), 997–1101.
23. [23] Coyne, K., A predictive model of nuclear power plant crew decision-making and performance in a dynamic simulation environment, College Park, MD: University of Maryland PhD Dissertation, 2009.
24. [24] Li, Y., Modeling and simulation of operator knowledge-based behavior, College Park. MD: University of Maryland PhD Disertation, 2013.