“It's a Frightful Scenario”: A Study of Tram Collisions on a Mixed-traffic Environment in an Australian Metropolitan Setting

Procedia Manufacturing

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 2706-2713

  Naweed, Anjum ^a   Rose, Janette ^a  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accident analysis; Safety; Situation awareness; Trams

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009932176     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23519789     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.666     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. [1] Landy, S., Traffic chaod after Royal Parade, Parkville accident, in Herald Sun2015, The Herald and Weekly Times (News Corp): Melbourne.
2. [2] Endsley, M.R., Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic system, Human Factors 37 (1995), 32–64.
3. [3] Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Young, K.L., Situation awareness on the road: review, theoretical and methodological issues, and future direction, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 13:4 (2012), 472–492.
4. [4] Woods, D. & Hollnagel, E., Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems Engineering2006, Boca Raton: FL: Taylor & Francis.
5. [5] Naweed, A., Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry, Accident Analysis and Prevention 60 (2013), 193–204.
6. [6] Cœugnet, S., et al., Time pressure, driving: Work, emotions, risks., Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 20:0 (2013), 39–51.
7. [7] Currie, G. & Burke, M., Light rail in Australia - Performance and prospects, in Australasian Transport Research Forum2013: Brisbane, Australia.
8. [8] Nye, B. Light rail in Australasia: The economic, social and environmental case. in Proceedings of 2015 Light Rail Conference. 2015. NSW: AU.
9. [9] Mitra, B., et al. Tram-related trauma in Melbourne, Victoria. Emergency Medicine Australasia 22:4 (2010), 337–342.
10. [10] Middendorp, C., Hop on tram for one hell of a scary ride, in The Sydney Morning Herald2010, Fairfax Media: New South Wales.
11. [11] Goh, Y., Brown, H., Spickett, J., Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture, Safety Science 48 (2010), 302–309.
12. [12] Dekker, S., Cilliers, P., Hofmeyr, J.-H., The complexity of failure: Implications of complexity theory for safety investigations, Safety Science 49 (2011), 939–945.
13. [13] Vaughan, D., The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA1997, USA: Uni of Chicago Press.
14. [14] Rasmussen, J., Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem, Safety Science 27:2–3 (1997), 183–213.
15. [15] Amalberti, R., The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems, Safety Science 37:2–3 (2001), 109–126.
16. [16] Naweed, A. The “Scenario Invention Task” (SIT): an innovative method for harnessing natural human creativity. in 19th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. 2015. Melbourne, Australia.
17. [17] Auerbach, C.F. & Silverstein, L.B., Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis2003, New York: New York University Press.
18. [18] Huberman, M.A. & Miles, M.B., Data management and analysis methods, in Handbook of qualitative research, N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Editors. 1994, Sage: Thousand Oaks. p. 209-219.