Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment

Ecological Economics

Volumn 134, Issue , 2017, Pages 104-113

  Czajkowski, Mikołaj ^a   Ahtiainen, Heini ^b   Artell, Janne ^b   Meyerhoff, Jürgen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Benefit transfer; Contingent valuation; Explanatory variables; Functional forms; International; Minimum tolerance levels; Transfer errors; Water quality

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC THEORY; ERROR ANALYSIS; INCOME; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROFITABILITY; TRANSFER FUNCTION; WATER QUALITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EUROPE;

EID: 85009912705     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abou-Ali, H., Belhaj, M., Does Benefit Transfer Always Work: A Multi-country Comparison. 2005, Göteborg University, Department of Economics, Göteborg.
2. Ahlvik, L., Ekholm, P., Hyytiäinen, K., Pitkänen, H., An economic–ecological model to evaluate impacts of nutrient abatement in the Baltic Sea. Environ. Model Softw. 55:0 (2014), 164–175.
3. Ahtiainen, H., Artell, J., Czajkowski, M., Hasler, B., Hasselström, L., Huhtala, A., Meyerhoff, J., Smart, J.C.R., Söderqvist, T., Alemu, M.H., Angeli, D., Dahlbo, K., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., Hyytiäinen, K., Karlõševa, A., Khaleeva, Y., Maar, M., Martinsen, L., Nõmmann, T., Pakalniete, K., Oskolokaite, I., Semeniene, D., Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 3:3 (2014), 1–28.
4. Ahtiainen, H., Artell, J., Czajkowski, M., Hasler, B., Hasselström, L., Hyytiäinen, K., Meyerhoff, J., Smart, J., Söderqvist, T., Zimmer, K., Khaleeva, J., Rastrigina, O., Tuhkanen, H., Public preferences regarding use and condition of the Baltic Sea – an international comparison informing marine policy. Mar. Policy 42 (2013), 20–30.
5. Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Fu, T.-T., Krupnick, A., Liu, J.-T., Shaw, D., Harrington, W., Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 34:2 (1997), 107–126.
6. Andreopoulos, D., Damigos, D., To transfer or not to transfer? Evidence from validity and reliability tests for international transfers of non-market adaptation benefits in river basins. J. Environ. Manag. 185 (2017), 44–53.
7. Barbier, E.B., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Is the income elasticity of the willingness to pay for pollution control constant?. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2016, 10.1007/s10640-016-0040-4.
8. Barton, D.N., The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 42:1–2 (2002), 147–164.
9. Barton, D.N., Mourato, S., Transferring the benefits of avoided health effects from water pollution between Portugal and Costa Rica. Environ. Dev. Econ. 8:2 (2003), 351–371.
10. Basili, M., Di Matteo, M., Ferrini, S., Analysing demand for environmental quality: a willingness to pay/accept study in the province of Siena (Italy). Waste Manag. 26:3 (2006), 209–219.
11. Baskaran, R., Cullen, R., Colombo, S., Testing different types of benefit transfer in valuation of ecosystem services: New Zealand winegrowing case studies. Ecol. Econ. 69:5 (2010), 1010–1022.
12. Bateman, I.J., Brouwer, R., Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D.N., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Liekens, I., Navrud, S., De Nocker, L., Ščeponavičiūtė, R., Semėnienė, D., Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. Environ. Resour. Econ. 50:3 (2011), 365–387.
13. Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Jones, A.P., Jude, S., Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: a virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 58:1 (2009), 106–118.
14. Brouwer, R., Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects. Ecol. Econ. 32:1 (2000), 137–152.
15. Brouwer, R., Bateman, I.J., Benefits transfer of willingness to pay estimates and functions for health-risk reductions: a cross-country study. J. Health Econ. 24:3 (2005), 591–611.
16. Brouwer, R., Spaninks, F.A., The validity of environmental benefits transfer: further empirical testing. Environ. Resour. Econ. 14:1 (1999), 95–117.
17. Brouwer, R., Martin-Ortega, J., Dekker, T., Sardonini, L., Andreu, J., Kontogianni, A., Skourtos, M., Raggi, M., Viaggi, D., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Rolfe, J., Windle, J., Improving value transfer through socio-economic adjustments in a multicountry choice experiment of water conservation alternatives. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 59:3 (2015), 458–478.
18. Cameron, T.A., Huppert, D.D., OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 17:3 (1989), 230–246.
19. Carson, R., Groves, T., Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ. Resour. Econ. 37:1 (2007), 181–210.
20. Carson, R.T., Louviere, J.J., Rose, J.M., Swait, J., Frontiers in modeling discrete choice experiments: a benefit transfer perspective. Johnston, J.R., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, S.R., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
21. Czajkowski, M., Ščasný, M., Study on benefit transfer in an international setting. How to improve welfare estimates in the case of the countries' income heterogeneity?. Ecol. Econ. 69:12 (2010), 2409–2416.
22. Ferrini, S., Fezzi, C., Generalized additive models for nonmarket valuation via revealed or stated preference methods. Land Econ. 88:4 (2012), 782–802.
23. Flores, N.E., Carson, R.T., The relationship between the income elasticities of demand and willingness to pay. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 33:3 (1997), 287–295.
24. Ghalwash, T., Demand for environmental quality: an empirical analysis of consumer behavior in Sweden. Environ. Resour. Econ. 41:1 (2008), 71–87.
25. HELCOM, Baltic sea action plan. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 2007-11-15, 2007.
26. Hökby, S., Söderqvist, T., Elasticities of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden. Environ. Resour. Econ. 26:3 (2003), 361–383.
27. Hynes, S., Norton, D., Hanley, N., Adjusting for cultural differences in international benefit transfer. Environ. Resour. Econ. 56:4 (2013), 499–519.
28. Hynes, S., Tinch, D., Hanley, N., Valuing improvements to coastal waters using choice experiments: an application to revisions of the EU bathing waters directive. Mar. Policy 40 (2013), 137–144.
29. Jacobsen, J.B., Hanley, N., Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 43:2 (2009), 137–160.
30. Johnston, R.J., Duke, J.M., Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: evaluating the common wisdom. Resour. Energy Econ. 32:3 (2010), 421–438.
31. Johnston, R.J., Rosenberger, R.S., Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J. Econ. Surv. 24:3 (2010), 479–510.
32. Johnston, R.J., Thomassin, P.J., Willingness to pay for water quality improvements in the United States and Canada: considering possibilities for international meta-analysis and benefit transfer. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 39:1 (2010), 114–131.
33. Johnston, R.J., Besedin, E.Y., Stapler, R., Enhanced geospatial validity for meta-analysis and environmental benefit transfer: an application to water quality improvements. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2016, 1–33.
34. Johnston, R.J., Boyle, K.J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T.A., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., Tourangeau, R., Vossler, C.A., Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2017 (forthcoming).
35. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., Brouwer, R., Introduction to benefit transfer methods. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., B.R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, 19–59.
36. Johnston, R.J., Rosenberger, R.S., Rolfe, J., Brouwer, R., Benefit transfer: the present state and future prospects. Johnston, J.R., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, S.R., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 553–574.
37. Kaul, S., Boyle, K.J., Kuminoff, N.V., Parmeter, C.F., Pope, J.C., What can we learn from benefit transfer errors? Evidence from 20 years of research on convergent validity. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 66:1 (2013), 90–104.
38. Kiirikki, M., Inkala, A., Kuosa, H., Pitkänen, H., Kuusisto, M., Sarkkula, J., Evaluating the effects of nutrient load reductions on the biomass of toxic nitrogenfixing cyanobacteria in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Boreal Environ. Res. 6 (2001), 1–16.
39. Kiirikki, M., Lehtoranta, J., Inkala, A., Pitkänen, H., Hietanen, S., Hall, P.O.J., Tengberg, A., Koponen, J., Sarkkula, J., A simple sediment process description suitable for 3D-ecosystem modelling — development and testing in the Gulf of Finland. J. Mar. Syst. 61:1–2 (2006), 55–66.
40. Kirchhoff, S., Colby, B.G., LaFrance, J.T., Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: an empirical inquiry. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 33:1 (1997), 75–93.
41. Kosenius, A.-K., Ollikainen, M., Ecosystem benefits from coastal habitats - a three-country choice experiment. Mar. Policy 58 (2015), 15–27.
42. Kreye, M., Adams, D., Escobedo, F., The value of forest conservation for water quality protection. Forests, 5(5), 2014, 862.
43. Krinsky, I., Robb, A.L., On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stat. 68:4 (1986), 715–719.
44. Krinsky, I., Robb, A.L., Three methods for calculating the statistical properties of elasticities: a comparison. Empir. Econ. 16:2 (1991), 199–209.
45. Kristofersson, D., Navrud, S., Validity tests of benefit transfer – are we performing the wrong tests?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 30:3 (2005), 279–286.
46. Kristofersson, D., Navrud, S., Can use and non-use values be transferred across countries?. Navrud, S., Ready, R., (eds.) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods, 2007, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 207–225.
47. Kriström, B., Spike models in contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 79:3 (1997), 1013–1023.
48. Kriström, B., Riera, P., Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 7:1 (1996), 45–55.
49. Liekens, I., Schaafsma, M., De Nocker, L., Broekx, S., Staes, J., Aertsens, J., Brouwer, R., Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium. Land Use Policy 30:1 (2013), 549–559.
50. Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?. Ecol. Econ. 66:2–3 (2008), 425–435.
51. Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Are internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?. Ecol. Econ. 70:9 (2011), 1628–1637.
52. Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Reliability of meta-analytic benefit transfers of international value of statistical life estimates: tests and illustrations. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, 441–464.
53. Londoño, L.M., Johnston, R.J., Enhancing the reliability of benefit transfer over heterogeneous sites: a meta-analysis of international coral reef values. Ecol. Econ. 78 (2012), 80–89.
54. Maar, M., Møller, E.F., Larsen, J., Madsen, K.S., Wan, Z., She, J., Jonasson, L., Neumann, T., Ecosystem modelling across a salinity gradient from the North Sea to the Baltic Sea. Ecol. Model. 222:10 (2011), 1696–1711.
55. Milligan, C., Kopp, A., Dahdah, S., Montufar, J., Value of a statistical life in road safety: a benefit-transfer function with risk-analysis guidance based on developing country data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 71 (2014), 236–247.
56. Muthke, T., Holm-Mueller, K., National and international benefit transfer testing with a rigorous test procedure. Environ. Resour. Econ. 29:3 (2004), 323–336.
57. Navrud, S., Value transfer and environmental policy. Tietemberg, T., Folmer, H., (eds.) The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005, a Survey of Current Issues, 2004, Edgar Elgar Publishers, London.
58. Navrud, S., Ready, R., Review of methods for value transfer. Navrud, S., Ready, R., (eds.) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods, 2007, Springer, Dordrecht, 1–10.
59. Pearce, D.W., Framework for assessing the distribution of environmental quality. Serret, Y., Johnstone, N., (eds.) The Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, 2006, Edward Elgar, 23–78.
60. Piper, S., Martin, W.E., Evaluating the accuracy of the benefit transfer method: a rural water supply application in the USA. J. Environ. Manag. 63:3 (2001), 223–235.
61. Ready, R., Navrud, S., International benefit transfer: methods and validity tests. Ecol. Econ. 60:2 (2006), 429–434.
62. Ready, R.C., Malzubris, J.n., Senkane, S., The relationship between environmental values and income in a transition economy: surface water quality in Latvia. Environ. Dev. Econ. 7:1 (2002), 147–156.
63. Ready, R., Navrud, S., Day, B., Dubourg, R., Machado, F., Mourato, S., Spanninks, F., Rodriquez, M.X.V., Benefit transfer in Europe: how reliable are transfers between countries?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 29:1 (2004), 67–82.
64. Richardson, L., Loomis, J., Kroeger, T., Casey, F., The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ. 115 (2015), 51–58.
65. Roach, B., Boyle, K.J., Welsh, M.P., Testing bid design effects in multiple bounded contingent valuation. Land Econ. 78:1 (2002), 121–131.
66. Rolfe, J., Wang, X., Dealing with scale and scope issues in stated preference experiments. Bennett, J., (eds.) The International Handbook on Non-market Environmental Valuation, 2011, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 254–272.
67. Rolfe, J., Windle, J., Distance decay functions for iconic assets: assessing national values to protect the health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Environ. Resour. Econ. 53:3 (2012), 347–365.
68. Rolfe, J., Windle, J., Testing benefit transfer of reef protection values between local case studies: the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Ecol. Econ. 81 (2012), 60–69.
69. Rosenberger, R.S., Benefit transfer validity and reliability. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 307–326.
70. Rosenberger, R.S., Loomis, J.B., Benefit transfer. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., Brown, T.C., (eds.) A Primer on Non-Market Valuation, 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 445–482.
71. Rowe, R.D., Schulze, W.D., Breffle, W.S., A test for payment card biases. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 31:2 (1996), 178–185.
72. Rozan, A., Benefit transfer: a comparison of WTP for air quality between France and Germany. Environ. Resour. Econ. 29:3 (2004), 295–306.
73. Shrestha, R.K., Loomis, J.B., Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: testing out-of-sample convergent validity. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25:1 (2003), 79–100.
74. Spash, C.L., Vatn, A., Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol. Econ. 60:2 (2006), 379–388.
75. Stapler, R., Johnston, R., Meta-analysis, benefit transfer, and methodological covariates: implications for transfer error. Environ. Resour. Econ. 42:2 (2009), 227–246.
76. Tyllianakis, E., Skuras, D., The income elasticity of Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) revisited: A meta-analysis of studies for restoring Good Ecological Status (GES) of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). J. Environ. Manag. 182 (2016), 531–541.
77. Vossler, C.A., Holladay, S., Alternative value elicitation formats in contingent valuation: a new hope. 22nd Annual Conference of European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 22–25, Zurich, Switzerland, 2016.
78. Vossler, C.A., Doyon, M., Rondeau, D., Truth in consequentiality: theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 4:4 (2012), 145–171.
79. Whitehead, J.C., Morgan, O.A., Huth, W.L., Benefit transfers with the contingent valuation method. Johnston, J.R., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, S.R., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 119–140.