Public preferences regarding use and condition of the Baltic Sea-An international comparison informing marine policy

Marine Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 20-30

  Ahtiainen, Heini ^a   Artell, Janne ^a   Czajkowski, MikoŁaj ^b   Hasler, Berit ^c   Hasselström, Linus ^d   Hyytiäinen, Kari ^a   Meyerhoff, Jürgen ^e   Smart, James C R ^c   Söderqvist, Tore ^d   Zimmer, Katrin ^f   Khaleeva, Julia ^g   Rastrigina, Olga ^h   Tuhkanen, Heidi ⁱ  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd   (Sweden)

^e TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^f SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (Sweden)

^g NEW ECONOMIC SCHOOL   (Russian Federation)

^h Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies   (Latvia)

ⁱ STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Recreation; Social preferences; The Baltic Sea

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EUROPEAN UNION; INTERTIDAL ENVIRONMENT; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE POLICY; PERCEPTION; POLICY MAKING; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

EID: 84874565274     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Halpern BS, Longo C, Hardy D, McLeod KL, Samhouri JF, Katona SK, et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 2012, 488:615-622. Available online. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/nature11397.pdf.
2. HELCOM. Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea-An integrated thematic assessment of the effects of nutrient enrichment and eutrophication in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings 2009, No. 115B. Available online:. http://meeting.helcom.fi/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=79889&folderId=377779&name=DLFE-36818.pdf.
3. HELCOM. Baltic Sea Action Plan. In: Proceedings of the HELCOM Ministerial Meeting. Krakow, Poland, 15 November 2007. Available online: http://www.helcom.fi/stc/files/BSAP/BSAP_Final.pdf.
4. European Union. Directive 2008/56/EC (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Off J Eur. Union; 2008. L164: p. 19-40.
5. HELCOM. Convention on the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area (Helsinki Convention); 1974. Available online: http://www.helcom.fi/stc/files/Convention/convention1974.pdf.
6. HELCOM. Convention on the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area (Helsinki Convention); 1992. Available online: http://www.helcom.fi/stc/files/Convention/Conv1108.pdf.
7. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Synthesis. Washington, DC; 2005.
8. UNEP-WCMC. Marine and coastal ecosystem services: Valuation methods and their application. UNEP-WCMC Biodiversity Series; 2011. No. 33. 46 pp.
9. Beaudoin Y, Pendleton L. Why value the Oceans? A Discussion Paper 2012, UNEP GRID-Ardenal, Norway.
10. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) 2010, Ecological and Economic Foundations, Washington, DC. P. Kumar (Ed.).
11. Söderqvist T, Hasselström L. The economic value of ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Existing information and gaps of knowledge. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Report 5874; 2008.
12. Bertram C, Rehdanz K. On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2013, 38:25-40.
13. Garpe K. Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Report 5873. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; 2008.
14. Likert R.A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932, 140:1-55.
15. Dillman D, Smyth J, Christian L. Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2009, John Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 499 pp. 3rd edition.
16. Söderqvist T, Ahtiainen H, Artell J, Czajkowski M, Hasler B, Hasselström L, et al. BalticSurvey - a survey study in the Baltic Sea countries on people's attitudes and use of the sea-Report on basic findings. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; 2010. Report 6348. Available online: 〈http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.5004bd9712b572e3de6800014154/BalticSurvey_bakgrundsrapport_webb.pdf〉.
17. Holbrook AL, Green MC, Krosnick JA. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires. Comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opinion Q 2003, 67:79-125.
18. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J American Stat Assoc 1952, 47:583-621.
19. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences 1988, McGraw Hill, Boston, USA.
20. Field A, Hole G. How to design and report experiments 2003, Sage Publications, London UK.
21. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis 2003, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 5th Edition.
22. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Society Monograph 1998, 30. Cambridge University Press.
23. Greene WH, Hensher DA. Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer 2010, Cambridge University Press.
24. Mora N. Sovereign credit ratings: Guilty beyond reasonable doubt?. J Banking & Finance 2006, 30(7):2041-2062.
25. HELCOM. Eutrophication status of the Baltic Sea in 2003-2007; 2010. Available online: http://www.helcom.fi/BSAP_assessment/eutro/HEAT/en_GB/status/.