Trust in technologies? Science after de-professionalization

Journal of Science Communication

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1-7

  Dickel, Sascha ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Popularization of science and technology; Professional development and training in science communication; Professionalism; Science and media

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009860311     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18242049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22323/2.15050303     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abbott, A. (2007). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, U.S.A.: University of Chicago Press.
2. Andersen, N. Å. and Knudsen, H. (2015). 'Playful hyper-responsibility and the making of a performing audience'. Soziale Systeme 19 (2). DOI: 10.1515/sosys-2014-0212.
3. Dickel, S. (forthcoming). 'Crowdification / Responsibilization: Technologies of Participation in Digital Citizen Science'. In: Techno Science Society. Technological Reconfigurations of Science and Society. Ed. by S. Maasen, S. Dickel and C. Schneider.
4. Dickel, S. and Franzen, M. (2016). 'The "Problem of Extension" revisited: new modes of digital participation in science'. JCOM 15 (01), A06. URL: http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/01/JCOM_1501_2016_A06.
5. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). 'Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists'. American Sociological Review 48 (6), pp. 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325.
6. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, U.S.A.: University of Chicago Press.
7. Guston, D. H. (2000). 'Retiring the Social Contract for Science'. Issues in Science and Technology 16 (4), pp. 32-36.
8. Henkel, A. (2011). Soziologie des Pharmazeutischen. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
9. Kriegeskorte, N. (2012). Beyond open access: visions for open evaluation of scientific papers by post-publication peer review. Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media SA.
10. Luhmann, N. (1990). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
11. Maasen, S. and Dickel, S. (2015). 'Partizipation, Responsivität, Nachhaltigkeit'. In: Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik. Ed. by D. Simon, A. Knie, S. Hornbostel and K. Zimmermann, pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-05677-3_21-1.
12. Melero, R. (2015). 'Altmetrics-a complement to conventional metrics'. Biochemia Medica 25 (2), pp. 152-160. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2015.016. PMID: 26110028.
13. Merton, R. K. (1938). 'Science and the Social Order'. Philosophy of Science 5 (3), pp. 321-337. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/184838.
14. Oevermann, U. (1996). Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handelns. Ed. by A. Combe. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp, pp. 70-182.
15. Parsons, T. (1978). Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York, U.S.A.: Free Press.
16. Peters, H. P., Dunwoody, S., Allgaier, J., Lo, Y.-Y. and Brossard, D. (2014). 'Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?' EMBO reports 15 (7), pp. 749-753. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201438979. PMID: 24920610.
17. Pfadenhauer, M. (2003). Professionalität: Eine wissenssoziologische Rekonstruktion institutionalisierter Kompentenzdarstellungskompetenz. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
18. Stichweh, R. (1997). 'Professions in modern society'. International Review of Sociology 7 (1), pp. 95-102. DOI: 10.1080/03906701.1997.9971225.
19. Stichweh, R. (2006). 'Professionen in einer funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft'. URL: https://www.fiw.uni-bonn.de/demokratieforschung/personen/stichweh/pdfs/53\_stw-prof.fd.pdf (visited on 21st April 2010).
20. Weingart, P. and Guenther, L. (2016). 'Science communication and the issue of trust'. JCOM 15 (05), C01. URL: http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/05/JCOM_1505_2016_C00/JCOM_1505_2016_C01.