What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability

Cancer

Volumn 123, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 1848-1859

  Snyder, Claire F ^a,b,c   Smith, Katherine C ^b,c   Bantug, Elissa T ^c   Tolbert, Elliott E ^a,b   Blackford, Amanda L ^c   Brundage, Michael D ^d   Aaronson, Neil K ^e   Ganz, Patricia A ^f   Garg, Ravin ^g   Michael, Fisch ^h   Hoffman, Vanessa ⁱ   Reeve, Bryce B ^j   Stotsky Himelfarb, Eden ^c   Stovall, Ellen ^k   Zachary, Matthew ^l  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e Netherlands Cancer Institute   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^k National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship   (United States)

^l Stupid Cancer   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

cancer; clinical practice; interpretation; patient management; patient reported outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; ONCOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SYMPTOM; AGED; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FATIGUE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; ONCOLOGIST; PERSONNEL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURVIVOR;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; ONCOLOGISTS; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SURVIVORS;

EID: 85009830166     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30530     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115–123.
2. Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, et al. A review of electronic patient reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10:e215–e222.
3. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714–724.
4. Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, et al. Enhancing patient-provider communication with the Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1029–1035.
5. Santana MJ, Feeny D, Johnson JA, et al. Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:371–379.
6. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communications. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2002;288:3027–3034.
7. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:401–416.
8. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559–568.
9. Haywood K, Marshall S, Fitzpatrick R. Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:12–23.
10. Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, et al. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:994–1000.
11. McLachlan SA, Allenby A, Matthews J, et al. Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessment versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4117–4125.
12. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:557–565.
13. Denis F, Lethrosne C, Pourel N, et al. Overall survival in patients with lung cancer using a web-application-guided follow-up compared to standard modalities: results of phase III randomized trial [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(suppl). Abstract LBA9006.
14. ePROVIDE. Getting started with ePROVIDE. Available at: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org/. Accessed July 15, 2016.
15. Snyder CF, Jensen R, Courtin SO, Wu AW. PatientViewpoint: a website for patient-reported outcomes assessment. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:793–800.
16. Abernethy AP, Wheeler JL, Zafar SY. Management of gastrointestinal symptoms in advanced cancer patients: the rapid learning cancer clinic model. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010;4:36–45.
17. HealthMeasures. PROMIS software demonstration. Available at: http://nihpromis.org/software/demonstration. Accessed July 15, 2016.
18. Jones JB, Snyder CF, Wu AW; for the Website for Outpatient QOL Assessment Research Network. Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1407–1417.
19. Snyder CF, Blackford AL, Wolff AC, et al. Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Psychooncology. 2013;22:895–901.
20. Brundage MD, Smith KC, Little EA, Bantug ET, Snyder CF; PRO Data Presentation Stakeholder Advisory Board. Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed methods evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:2457–2472.
21. Smith KC, Brundage MD, Tolbert E, et al. Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:4149–4157.
22. Bantug ET, Coles T, Smith KC, et al. Graphical displays of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for use in clinical practice: what makes a PRO picture worth a thousand words? Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:483–490.
23. Kuijpers W, Giesinger JM, Zabernigg A, et al. Patients' and health professionals' understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:595–604.
24. Hartzler AL, Izard JP, Dalkin BL, Mikles SP, Gore JL. Design and feasibility of integrating personalized PRO dashboards into prostate cancer care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:38–47.
25. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1305–1314.