The Un-Observed Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Technique Used in the SPRINT Study Points to a Standard Target Office Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mmHg

Current Hypertension Reports

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Kjeldsen, Sverre E ^a   Mancia, Giuseppe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Antihypertensive drug treatment; Blood pressure measurement; Blood pressure target; Hypertension; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE METER; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUERTO RICO; REVIEW; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION; BLOOD PRESSURE; DRUG EFFECTS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HUMANS;

EID: 85009770778     PISSN: 15226417     EISSN: 15343111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11906-017-0700-y     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Ambrosius WT, Sink KM, Foy CG, et al. The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Clinical Trials. 2014;11:532–46.
2. The SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.
3. Schiffrin EL, Calhoun DA, Flack JM. SPRINT proves that lower is better for non-diabetic high-risk patients, but at a price. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29:2–4.
4. Myers MG, Godwin M, Daves M, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution. Hypertension. 2010;55:195–200.
5. Drawz PE, Pajewski NM, Bates JT, et al. Effect of intensive versus standard clinic-based hypertension management on ambulatory blood pressure. Results from the SPRINT (systolic blood pressure intervention trial) ambulatory blood pressure study. Hypertension. 2017;69:00–00. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08076.
6. Filipovský J, Seidlerová J, Kratochvíl Z, et al. Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Blood Press. 2016;25:228–34.
7. Lund-Johansen P. Hemodynamics in early essential hypertension (table 23, page 43). Acta Medica Scand. 1967;181(Suppl.482):2–101.
8. Mancia G, Bertinieri G, Grassi G, et al. Effects of blood pressure measurements by the doctor on the patientʼs blood pressure and heart rate. Lancet. 1983;2:695–8.
9. Mancia G, Parati G, Pomidossi G, et al. Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse. Hypertension. 1987;9:209–15.
10. Parati G, Pomidossi G, Casadei R, Mancia G. Lack of alerting reactions to intermittent cuff inflations during noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 1985;7:597–601.
11. Kjeldsen SE, Lund-Johansen P, Nilsson P, Mancia G. Unattended blood pressure measurements in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial. Implications for entry and achieved blood pressure values compared with other trials. Hypertension. 2016;67:808–12.
12. Kjeldsen SE, Hedner T, Jamerson K, et al. Hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) study: home blood pressures in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1998;31:1014–20.