Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Blood Pressure

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 228-234

  Filipovský, Jan ^a,b   Seidlerová, Jitka ^a,b   Kratochvíl, Zdeněk ^a   Karnosová, Petra ^a,b   Hronová, Markéta ^a   Mayer, Otto ^a,b  

^a Department of Internal Medicine II ^*  (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Automated office blood pressure; blood pressure measurement; home blood pressure; white coat effect

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; ANTILIPEMIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 84958037665     PISSN: 08037051     EISSN: 16511999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M.G.Myers The great myth of office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1894–18.
2. E.A.Andreadis, G.D.Agaliotis, E.T.Angelopoulos, A.P.Tsakanikas, I.A.Chaveles, G.P.Mousoulis Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:661–666.
3. N.R.Campbell, D.W.McKay, H.Conradson. et al. Automated oscillometric blood pressure versus auscultatory blood pressure as a predictor of carotid intima–medial thickness in male firefighters. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:588–590.
4. 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1925–1938.
5. M.G.Myers, J.Kaczorowski, M.Dawes, M.Godwin Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:127–132.
6. J.M.Wright, G.S.Mattu, T.L.PerryJr, et al. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:161–165.
7. L.Beckett, M.Godwin The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:18.
8. C.Edwards, S.Hiremath, A.Gupta, et al. BpTRUth: do automated blood pressure monitors outperform mercury? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013;7:448–453.
9. J.P.Sheppard, R.Holder, L.Nichols, et al. Predicting out-of-office blood pressure level using repeated measurements in the clinic: an observational cohort study. J Hypertens. 2014;32:2171–2178.
10. F.Saladini, E.Benetti, G.Malipiero, et al. Does home blood pressure allow for a better assessment of the white-coat effect than ambulatory blood pressure? J Hypertens. 2012;30:2118–2124.
11. M.G.Myers, M.Valdivieso, A.Kiss Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14:108–111.
12. G.Parati, G.S.Stergiou, R.Asmar, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505–1530.
13. M.G.Myers, M.Godwin, M.Dawes, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286.
14. G.Schillaci, G.Pucci, M.Pirro, et al. Combined effects of office and 24-h blood pressure on aortic stiffness in human hypertension. J Hypertens. 2011;29:869–875.
15. G.Mancia, M.Bombelli, R.Facchetti, et al. Long-term risk of sustained hypertension in white-coat or masked hypertension. Hypertension. 2009;54:226–232.
16. G.Mancia, M.Bombelli, R.Facchetti, et al. Increased long-term risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in white-coat and masked hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009;27:1672–1678.
17. P.Verdecchia, G.P.Reboldi, F.Angeli, et al. Short- and long-term incidence of stroke in white-coat hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;45:203–208.
18. G.Mancia, M.Bombelli, G.Brambilla, et al. Long-term prognostic value of white coat hypertension: an insight from diagnostic use of both ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements. Hypertension. 2013;62:168–174.
19. SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–2116.
20. W.C.Cushman, P.K.Whelton, L.J.Fine, et al., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553234 SPRINT Trial Results: Latest News in Hypertension Management. Hypertension. 2016;67:263–265.
21. E.L.Schiffrin, D.A.Calhoun, J.M.Flack SPRINT proves that lower is better for nondiabetic high-risk patients, but at a price. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29:2–4.
22. SPRINT Research Group. The design and rationale of a multi-center clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Clin Trials. 2014;11:532–546.