Library web site user testing

College and Undergraduate Libraries

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-17

  Callicott, Burton ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Department of Teacher Education and Department of Sociology and Anthropology   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Usability testing; User testing; Web site design

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009645192     PISSN: 10691316     EISSN: 15452530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J106v09n01_01     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. D'Hertefelt, Sim. 1999. Observation Methods and Tips for Usability Testing Interaction Architect.Com .
2. Kuniavsky, Mike. 1998. Why User Testing is Good Webmonkey 1–4. .
3. Neilson, Jacob. 2000. Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users Usit.com's Alertbox. .
4. Chisman, Janet, Diller, Karen, and Walbridge, Sharon. 1999. Usability Testing:A Case Study. College And Research Libraries News, 60:552–569.
5. D'Hertefelt, Sim. 1999. Observation Methods and Tips for Usability Testing InteractionArchitect.Com (November 15, 2001).
6. Gordon, Seth. 2000. User Testing:How to Plan, Execute, and Report on a Usability Evaluation C-Net . (November 15, 2001).
7. Kuniavsky, Mike. 1998. Why User Testing is Good. Webmonkey,:1–4. (November 15, 2001).
8. Neilson, Jacob. 2000. Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users. Usit.com's. Alertbox., . (November 15, 2001).
9. Tennant, Roy. 2000. Determining Our Digital Destiny. American Libraries, 30.1:54–58.
10. Veldof, Jerilyn, Prasse, Michael, and Mills, Victoria. 1999. Chauffeured by the User:Usability in the Electronic Library. Journal of Library Administration, 26:115–40.
11. Wood, Larry. 2000. Why Ask Why in a Usability Evaluation. UPA Voice., . (November 15, 2001).