An endarkened feminist epistemology? Identity, difference and the politics of representation in educational research

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 197-214

  Wright, Handel Kashope ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009600441     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951839032000060626     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
2. Blades, D. (2000). Coming about: Reason, rebellion and responsibility in post-modern curriculum theorizing. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, Montreal.
3. Britzman, D. (1990). Could this be your story? Guilty readings and other ethnographic dramas. Paper presented at the Bergamo Conference, Dayton, Ohio, October, 1990.
4. Britzman, D. (1995). “The question of belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(3), 229-238.
5. Buffalo Springfield. (1969). For what it’s worth. Retrospective: The best of Buffalo Springfield. Atco Records.
6. Butler, J. (1991). Imitation and gender insorburdination. In Diana Fuss (Ed.). Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories. New York: Routledge.
7. Chapman, T. (1988). Talkin’ bout a revolution. Tracy Chapman. New York: Elektra/Asylum Records.
8. Cole, J. (Ed.). (1986). All American women: Lines that divide, ties that bind. New York: Free Press.
9. Constas, M. A. (1998). The changing nature of educational research and a critique of postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 26-33.
10. Corrigan, P. (1991). Power/difference. Sociological Review, May.
11. Dei, G. (1996). Anti-racism education: Theory and practice. Halifax: Fernwood Press.
12. de Lauretis, T. (1986). Feminist studies/critical studies: Issues, terms, and contexts. In Teresa de Lauretis (Ed.). Feminist studies/critical studies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
13. Dei, G. (1999). The denial of difference: Reframing anti-racist praxis. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 2(1), 17-37.
14. Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555-582.
15. Dillard, C. (2000a). The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(6) 661-681.
16. Dillard, C. (2000b). Cultural considerations in paradigm proliferation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
17. Dobrin, S. (1999). Race and the public intellectual: A conversation with Michael Eric Dyson. In Gary A. Olson and Lynn Worsham (Eds.), Race, rhetoric, and the postcolonial. New York: SUNY Press.
18. Donmoyer, R. (1996). Educational research in an era of paradigm proliferation: What’s a journal editor to do? Educational Researcher, 25(2), 19-25.
19. Donmoyer, R. (2000). The problem and potential of paradigm proliferation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
20. Drew, J. (1999). Cultural composition: Stuart Hall on ethnicity and the discursive turn. In Gary Olson and Lynn Worsham (Eds.), Race, rhetoric, and the postcolonial. New York: SUNY Press.
21. DuBois, W. E. B. (1961). The souls of black folk. New York: Washington Square Press.
22. Duran, J. (1991). Toward a feminist epistemology. Savage, ML: Rowan & Littlefield.
23. Eisner E. & Peshkin, A. (Eds.). (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Fish, S. (1980). What makes an interpretation acceptable? In Is there a text in this class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Press.
26. Fuss, D. (1995). Identification papers. New York: Routledge.
27. Gates, H. L. & Appiah, K. A. (1995). Editors’ introduction: Multiplying identities. In K. A. Appiah and H. L. Gates (Eds.), Identities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Gilroy, P. (2000). Against race: Imagining political culture beyond the color line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Gilroy, P., Grossberg, L. & McRobbie, A. (Eds.). (2000). Without guarantees: In honour of Stuart Hall. London: Verso.
30. Gordon, B. (1990). The necessity of African-American epistemology for educational theory and practice. Journal of Education, 172(3), 88-106.
31. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin and Y Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
32. Hall, S. (1992). What is this “black” in black popular culture? In G. Dent (Ed.), Black popular culture. Seattle: Bay Press.
33. Hall, S. (1996). New ethnicities. In D. Morley & Kuan-Hsing Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
34. Hankinson Nelson, L. (1993). Epistemological communities. In L. Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
35. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
36. Harding, S. (1987). Fminism and methodology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
37. Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
38. Harrison, F. (1988). Introduction: An African diaspora perspective for urban anthropology. Urban Anthropology, 17(2-3), 111-141.
39. Harrison, F. (1990). Three women, one struggle: Anthropology, performance, and pedagogy. Transforming Anthropology, 1(1), 1-9.
40. Harrison, F. (1991a). Ethnography as politics. In Faye Harrison (Ed.), Decolonizing anthropology: Moving further toward an anthropology for liberation. Arlington, VA: Association of Black Anthropologists.
41. Harrison, F. (Ed.). (1991b). Decolonizing anthropology: Moving further toward an anthropology for liberation. Arlington, VA: Association of Black Anthropologists.
42. Harrison, F. (1992). The Du Boisian legacy in anthropology. Critical Anthropology, 12(3), 239-260.
43. Harrison, F. (Ed.). (1997). Decobnizing anthropology: Moving further toward an anthropology for liberation. Arlington, VA: Association of Black Anthropologists.
44. Harrison, F. (1999a). Introduction: Expanding the discourse on “race”. American Anthropologist, 100(3), 609-631.
45. Harrison, F. (1999b). New voices of diversity, academic relations of production, and the free market. In L. Basch, L. Wood Saunders, J. Wojcicka Sharff, & J. Peacock (Eds.), Transforming academia: Challenges and opportunities for an engaged anthropology. American Ethnological Society Monograph Series.
46. Harrison, F., Harrison, I., & Jordan, G. (1995). Introduction: Anthropology, African Americans, and the emancipation of a subjugated knowledge. In I. Harrison, G. Jordan, & F. Harrison (Eds.), Pioneers in African American anthropology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
47. Harrison, F., & Nonini, D. (1992). Introduction to WEB Du Bois and anthropology. Critical Anthropology, 12(3), 229-237.
48. Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
49. Hooks, B. (1988). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Toronto: Between the Lines Press.
50. Howe, K. (1985). Two dogmas of educational research. Educational Researcher, 14(8), 10-18.
51. Howe, K. (1998). The interpretive turn and the new debate in education. Educational Researcher, 27(8), 13-22.
52. Johnson, L. K. (1990). It dread inna Inglan. Dread beat an blood. London: Virgin Records.
53. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
54. Lather, P. (2000). The possibilities of paradigm proliferation. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
55. Lincoln, Y & Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
56. Marley, B. (1985). Rebel's hop. One love. London: Pickwick International.
57. Miles, M. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problems of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590-601.
58. Miller, S., Wilson Nelson, & Moore. (1998). Caught in the paradigm gap: Qualitative researchers’ lived experience and the politics of epistemology. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 377-416.
59. Morrison, T. (1992). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Pillow, W. (2000). Deciphering attempts to decipher postmodern educational research. Educational Researcher, 29(5), 21-24.
61. Razack, S. (1998). Looking white people in the eye: Gender, race, and culture in courtrooms and classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
62. Rist, R. (1977). On the relations among educational research paradigms: From disdain to de tente. Anthropobgy and Educational Quarterly, 8, 42-49.
63. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64. Rosaldo, R (1989). Culture & truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
65. Said, E. (1982). The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Saleem, D. (1999). Islam mattws: Qualitative lessons from the legacy of a Muslim African-American educator. Unpublished dissertation, Ohio State University.
67. Salvaggio, R. (1989). The case of the two cultures: Psychoanalytic theories of science and literature. In M. Barr & R. Feldstein (Eds.), Discontented discourses: Feminism, textual intervention, psychoanalysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
68. Scheurich, J., & Young, M. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
69. Scheurich, J., & Young, M. (1998). Rejoinder: In the United States of America, in both our souls and our sciences, we are avoiding white racism. Educational Researcher, 27(9), 27-32.
70. Schrag, F. (1992). In defense of positivist research paradigms. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 5-8.
71. Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
72. Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
73. Smith, J. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12, 6-13.
74. Smith, J., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-13.
75. Spivak, G. C. (1990a). Strategy, identity, writing. In S. Harasym (Ed.), The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. New York: Routledge.
76. Spivak, G. C. (1990b). Practical politics of the open end. In S. Harasym (ed.), The post-colonial critic: Intwviws, strategies, dialogues. New York: Routledge.
77. Spivak, G. C. (1995). Acting bits/identity talk. In K. A. Appiah & H. L. Gates (Eds.), Identities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
78. St. Pierre, E. (2000). Deciphering attempts to decipher postmodern educational research. Educational Researcher, 29(5), 25-28.
79. Tosh, P. (1977). African. Equal Rights. SONY/Columbia Records.
80. Tyson, C. (1998). A response to “coloring epistemologies: Are our qualitative research epistemologies racially biased?” Educational Researcher, 27(9), 21-22.