Rhizovocality

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 693-710

  Jackson, Alecia Youngblood ^a  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009593091     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951839032000142968     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women and performance: A journal of feminist theory, 5(1), 7-27.
2. Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5-33.
3. Allison, D. B. (1973). Translator’s introduction. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Speech and phenomena and other essays on HusserVs theory of signs (pp. xxxi-xlii). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
4. Behar, R. (1993). Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperanza s story. Boston: Beacon Press.
5. Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
6. Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7. Britzman, D. (1994). Is there a problem with knowing thyself? Toward a poststructuralist view of teacher identity. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachws thinking, teachers knowing: Reflections on literacy and language education (pp. 53-75). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
8. Britzman, D. (2000). “The question of belief’: Writing poststructural ethnography. In E.A.S. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Fminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 27-40). New York: Routledge. (Original publication 1995)
9. Brown, L.M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women s psychology and girls’ development. New York: Ballantine Books.
10. Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, (pp. 1-27). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Collins, P.H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
12. De Lauretis, T. (1984). Alice doesn’t: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (D. B. Allison, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. (Original publication 1967)
15. Derrida, J. (1981). Positions (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1972)
16. Derrida, J. (1997). Ofgrammatology (G.C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original publication 1967)
17. DeVault, M.L. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Phil adelphia: Temple University Press.
18. Ellsworth, E. (1994). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In L. Stone (Ed.), The education feminism reader (pp. 300-327). New York: Routledge.
19. Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Fonow, M.M., & Cook, J.A. (1990). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In J.M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (pp. 69-93). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21. Fonow, M.M., & Cook, J.A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22. Fuss, D. (1989). Essentially speaking- Feminism, nature & difference. New York: Routledge.
23. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
25. Harding, S. (1987a). Conclusion: Epistemological questions. In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 181-190). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987b). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27. Harding, S. (1987c). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1 -14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28. Hargreaves, A. (1996). Revisiting voice. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 12-19.
29. hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.
30. hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston: South End Press.
31. hooks, b. (1992). Eating the other: Desire and resistance. In Black Looks: Race and Representation (pp. 21-39). Boston: South End Press.
32. Jojola, T.S. (1998). On revision and revisionism: American Indian representations in New Mexico. In D.A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians (pp. 172-180). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
33. Kitzinger, C., & Wilkinson, S. (1996). Theorizing representing the other. In C. Kitzinger & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Representing the other: A fminism and psychology reader (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Klein, R.D. (1983). How to do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles & R.D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 88-104). London: Routledge.
35. Kondo, D.K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Fminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
37. Lather, P. (2000a). Gendmng issues of narrative and voice in qualitative research in education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
38. Lather, P. (2000b). How research can be made to mean: Feminist ethnography at the limits of representation. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
39. Lather, P. (2000c). Postbook: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
40. Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41. Linden, R.R. (1993). Making stories, making selves: Feminist reflections on the Holocaust. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
42. Lugones, M.C., & Spelman, E.V. (2000). Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism, and the demand for “the woman’s voice”. In W. K. Kolmer & F. Bartkowski (Eds.), Feminist theory: A reader (pp. 17-27). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company. (Original publication 1983)
43. Madriz, E. (2000). Focus groups in feminist research. In N.K. Denzin & YS. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 835-850). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Massumi, B. (1987). Translator’s foreword: Pleasures of philosophy. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. ix-xv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45. Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R.D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of womens studies (pp. 117-139). London: Routledge.
46. Mies, M. (1991). Women’s research or feminist research? The debate surrounding feminist science and methodology. In M.M. Fonow & J.A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology (pp. 60-84). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47. Mohanty, C.T. (1984). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and postcolonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3).
48. Munhall, P.L. (Ed.). (1994). In women’s experience. New York: National League of Nursing Press.
49. Nielsen, J.M. (Ed.). (1990a). Feminist research methods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50. Nielsen, J.M. (1990b). Introduction. In J.M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (pp. 1-37). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51. Oleson, V.L. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 215-255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Riley, D. (1988). Am I that name? Fminism and the category of ‘women’ in history. New York: Macmillan.
54. Scott, J.W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17(4), 773-797.
55. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.
56. Spivak, G.C. (1986). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. London: Methuen.
57. Spivak, G.C. (1994). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 271-313). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original publication 1988)
58. St. Pierre, E.A. (1997a). An introduction to figuration - a poststructural practice of inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(3), 279-284.
59. St. Pierre, E.A. (1997b). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175-189.
60. St. Pierre, E.A. (1999). The work of response in ethnography. Journal Of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(3), 266-287.
61. Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s studies forum, 11(1), 21-27.
62. Stanley, L. (Ed.). (1990). Fminist praxis: Research, theory, and epistemology in feminist sociology. New York: Routledge.
63. Strathern, M. (1987). An awkward relationship: The case of feminism and anthropology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(2), 276-292.
64. Suleri, S. (1992). Woman skin deep: Feminism and the postcolonial condition. Critical Inquiry, 18(4).
65. Swisher, K.G. (1998). Why Indian people should be the ones to write about Indian education. In D.A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and acadmics: Researching and writing about American Indians (pp. 190-199). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
66. Thornton, R. (Ed.). (1998). Studying Native America: Problems and prospects. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
67. Trinh, T.M. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
68. Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
69. Westkott, M. (1990). Feminist criticism of the social sciences. In J.M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (pp. 58-67). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
70. Wolf, D.L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D.L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1-55). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
71. Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice told tale: Feminism, postmodernism, and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford: Stanford University Press.