Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 43-48

  Sailer, Irena ^a   Benic, Goran I ^b   Fehmer, Vincent ^a   Hämmerle, Christoph H F ^b   Mühlemann, Sven ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CEREC; DENTAL PORCELAIN; GLASS CERAMICS; IPS E.MAX PRESS; LITHIA DISILICATE;

CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CASTING; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL TECHNICIAN; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOFTWARE; SWITZERLAND; TIME FACTOR; TOOTH CROWN; WORKFLOW;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL TECHNICIANS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; SOFTWARE; SWITZERLAND; TIME FACTORS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 85009517019     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dawood, A., Purkayastha, S., Patel, S., MacKillop, F., Tanner, S., Microtechnologies in implant and restorative dentistry: a stroll through a digital dental landscape. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 224 (2010), 789–796.
2. Fasbinder, D.J., Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 31 Spec No 4 (2010), 2–11 quiz 2.
3. Contrepois, M., Soenen, A., Bartala, M., Laviole, O., Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110 (2013), 447–454.
4. Mously, H.A., Finkelman, M., Zandparsa, R., Hirayama, H., Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 249–256.
5. Guess, P.C., Vagkopoulou, T., Zhang, Y., Wolkewitz, M., Strub, J.R., Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent 42 (2014), 199–209.
6. Sturzenegger, B., Feher, A., Luthy, H., Schumacher, M., Loeffel, O., Filser, F., et al. [Clinical study of zirconium oxide bridges in the posterior segments fabricated with the DCM system]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 110 (2000), 131–139.
7. van Noort, R., The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28 (2012), 3–12.
8. Torabi, K., Farjood, E., Hamedani, S., Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature. J Dent (Shiraz) 16 (2015), 1–9.
9. Christensen, G.J., Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140 (2009), 1301–1304.
10. Patel, N., Contemporary dental CAD/CAM: modern chairside/lab applications and the future of computerized dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 35 (2014), 739–746 quiz 47, 56.
11. Fasbinder, D.J., Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137:suppl (2006), 22S–31S.
12. Mormann, W.H., Brandestini, M., [Cerec-System: computerized inlays, onlays and shell veneers]. Zahnarztl Mitt 77 (1987), 2400–2405.
13. Fasbinder, D.J., The CEREC system: 25 years of chairside CAD/CAM dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 141:suppl 2 (2010), 3S–4S.
14. Schoenbaum, T.R., Dentistry in the digital age: an update. Dent Today, 31, 2012, 108 10, 12-13.
15. Joda, T., Bragger, U., Time-efficiency analysis comparing digital and conventional workflows for implant crowns: a prospective clinical crossover trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30 (2015), 1047–1053.
16. Abduo, J., Lyons, K., Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. Int J Dent, 2013, 2013, 768121.
17. Kapos, T., Ashy, L.M., Gallucci, G.O., Weber, H.P., Wismeijer, D., Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:suppl (2009), 110–117.
18. Joda, T., Bragger, U., Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 25 (2014), 1304–1306.
19. Lee, S.J., Gallucci, G.O., Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24 (2013), 111–115.
20. Benic, G.I., S. M, Fehmer, V., Hammerle, C., Sailer, I., Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent 116 (2016), 777–782.
21. Zeltner, M., Sailer, I., Mühlemann, S., Özcan, M., Hammerle, C., Benic, G.I., Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent 117 (2017), 354–362.