Use of application containers and workflows for genomic data analysis

Journal of Pathology Informatics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Schulz, Wade L ^a   Durant, Thomas J S ^a   Siddon, Alexa J ^a,b   Torres, Richard ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Big data; bioinformatics workflow; containerization; genomics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009265621     PISSN: 22295089     EISSN: 21533539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.197197     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Krumholz HM, Waldstreicher J. The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project-A mechanism for data sharing. N Engl J Med 2016;375:403-5.
2. Collins FS, Barker AD. Mapping the cancer genome. Pinpointing the genes involved in cancer will help chart a new course across the complex landscape of human malignancies. Sci Am 2007;296:50-7.
3. Fan J, Han F, Liu H. Challenges of big data analysis. Natl Sci Rev 2014;1:293-314.
4. Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: Enhancing reproducibility and accessibility. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:667-72.
5. Blankenberg D, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, et al. Galaxy: A web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2010;Chapter 19:Unit 19.10.1-21.
6. Hatakeyama M, Opitz L, Russo G, Qi W, Schlapbach R, Rehrauer H, et al. SUSHI: An exquisite recipe for fully documented, reproducible and reusable NGS data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2016;17:228.
7. Dudley JT, Butte AJ. In silico research in the era of cloud computing. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:1181-5.
8. Howe B. Virtual appliances, cloud computing, and reproducible research. Comput Sci Eng 2012;14:36-41.
9. Docker. 2016. Available from: https://www.docker.com. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
10. Docker AC. Software engineering. IEEE Softw 2015;32:102-3.
11. Boettiger C. An introduction to Docker for reproducible research. SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 2015;49:71-9.
12. Hung LH, Kristiyanto D, Lee SB, Yeung KY. GUIdock: Using Docker containers with a common graphics user interface to address the reproducibility of research. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152686.
13. Moreews F, Sallou O, Ménager H, Le Bras Y, Monjeaud C, Blanchet C, et al. BioShaDock: A community driven bioinformatics shared Docker-based tools registry. F1000Res 2015;4:1443.
14. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2059-74.
15. Piccolo SR, Frampton MB. Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility. Gigascience 2016;5:30.
16. Spotify. Luigi; 2016. Available from: https://www.github.com/spotify/luigi. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
17. National Cancer Institute. Genomic Data Commons; 2016. Available from: https://www.gdc.cancer.gov. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
18. Larson DE, Harris CC, Chen K, Koboldt DC, Abbott TE, Dooling DJ, et al. SomaticSniper: Identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:311-7.
19. Miller CA, White BS, Dees ND, Griffith M, Welch JS, Griffith OL, et al. SciClone: Inferring clonal architecture and tracking the spatial and temporal patterns of tumor evolution. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003665.
20. Lampa S. Sci: Luigi; 2016. Available from: https://www.github.com/pharmbio/sciluigi. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
21. Preeth EN, Mulerickal FJ, Paul B, Sastri Y. Evaluation of Docker Containers Based on Hardware Utilization. In: 2015 International Conference on Control Communication and Computing India (ICCC); 2015. p. 697-700.