Forest tenure and conflict in Indonesia: Contested rights in Rempek Village, Lombok

Land Use Policy

Volumn 57, Issue , 2016, Pages 241-249

  Riggs, Rebecca Anne ^a   Sayer, Jeffrey ^a   Margules, Chris ^a,b   Boedhihartono, Agni Klintuni ^a   Langston, James Douglas ^a   Sutanto, Hari ^a,c  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

^c Forestry Research and Development Agency   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Conflict; Forest boundaries; Indonesia; Land tenure; Landscape approach

Indexed keywords

LAND REFORM; LAND RIGHTS; LAND TENURE; LAND USE CONFLICT; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; LEGISLATION; LIVELIHOOD; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL MOVEMENT;

INDONESIA; LESSER SUNDA ISLANDS; LOMBOK; WEST NUSA TENGGARA;

EID: 85009247039     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AMAN, n.d. Profil Organisasi. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). Retrieved from http://www.aman.or.id/wp-content/plugins/downloads-manager/upload/Profil_AMAN.pdf.
2. APRIL Group, Restorasi Ekosistem Riau. 2015 Retrieved from http://www.rekoforest.org.
3. BPN, Letter No. 460.2/199/1991. 1991, Badan Pertanahan Nasional.
4. Bae, J.S., Kim, C., Kim, Y.-S., Latifah, S., Afifi, M., Fisher, L.A., Lee, S.M., Kim, I., Kang, J., kim, R., Kim, J.S., Opportunities for Implementing REDD+ to Enhance Sustainable Forest Management and Improve Livelihoods in Lombok, NTB Indonesia, vol. 151, 2014, CIFOR.
5. Bakker, L., Moniaga, S., The space between: land claims and the law in Indonesia. Asian J. Soc. Sci. 38:2 (2010), 187–203, 10.1163/156853110x490890.
6. Bakker, L., Can we get Hak Ulayat? Land and community in Pasir and Nunukan, East Kalimantan. Cent. Southeast Asia Stud., 2008.
7. Balint, P.J., Stewart, R.E., Desai, A., Wicked Environmental Problems: Managing Uncertainty and Conflict. 2011, Island Press.
8. Barr, C.M., Sayer, J.A., The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia-Pacific: critical issues for REDD+. Biol. Conserv. 154 (2012), 9–19.
9. Barr, C.M., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Dermawan, A., McCarthy, J., Moeliono, M., Setiono, B., Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development and Community Livelihoods. 2006, CIFOR.
10. Bennett, C.P., Responsibility, accountability and national unity in village governance. Which Way Forw., 2002, 60–80.
11. Brockhaus, M., Obidzinski, K., Dermawan, A., Laumonier, Y., Luttrell, C., An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?. For. Policy Econ. 18 (2012), 30–37.
12. Colchester, M., Jiwan, N., Andiko, M.S., Firdaus, A.Y., Surambo, A., Pane, H., Promised Land: Palm Oil and Land Acquisition in Indonesia: Implications for Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples. 2006, Forest Peoples Programme, Perkumpulan Sawit Watch, HuMA, and the World Agroforestry Centre, Moreton-in-Marsh, United Kingdom.
13. Colfer, C.J.P., Pfund, J.-L., Collaborative Governance of Tropical Landscapes. 2011, Routledge.
14. Constantino d, P.d.A.L., Carlos, H.S.A., Ramalho, E.E., Rostant, L., Marinelli, C.E., Teles, D., Fonseca-Junior, S.F., Fernandes, R.B., Valsecchi, J., Empowering local people through community-based resource monitoring: a comparison of Brazil and Namibia, Ecol. Soc., 17(4), 2012, 22.
15. Contreras-Hermosilla, A., Fay, C., Effendi, E., Strengthening Forest Management in Indonesia through Land Tenure Reform: Issues and Framework for Action. 2005, Forest Trends, Washington DC.
16. Cooperrider, D.L., Srivastva, S., Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 1:1 (1987), 129–169.
17. Davidson, J., Henley, D., The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. 2007, Routledge.
18. Daws, G., Fujita, M., Archipelago: The Islands of Indonesia: From the Nineteenth-century Discoveries of Alfred Russel Wallace to the Fate of Forests and Reefs in the Twenty-first Century. 1999, Univ. of California Press.
19. Duncan, C.R., Mixed outcomes: the impact of regional autonomy and decentralization on indigenous ethnic minorities in Indonesia. Dev. Change 38:4 (2007), 711–733, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00430.x.
20. FAO, 2002. Land Tenure and Rural Development.
21. Fisher, L., Moeliono, I., Wodicka, S., The Nusa Tenggara Uplands, Indonesia: multiple site lessons in conflict management. Cultivating Peace: Conflict and Collaboration in Natural Resource Management, 1999, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, 61–80.
22. Fitzpatrick, D., ‘Best practice’ options for the legal recognition of customary tenure. Dev. Change 36:3 (2005), 449–475.
23. Freeman, O.E., Duguma, L.A., Minang, P.A., Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice. Ecol. Soc., 20(1), 2015, 24ff.
24. Galudra, G., Van Noordwijk, M., Agung, P., Suyanto, S., Pradhan, U., Migrants, land markets and carbon emissions in Jambi, Indonesia: land tenure change and the prospect of emission reduction. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 2013, 10.1007/s11027-013-9512-9.
25. Harsono, B., Indonesian Agrarian Law: The History, Shaping and Content of Basic Agrarian Law. 1977, Djambatan Publishing, Jakarta, Indonesia.
26. Hauser-Schäublin, B., Adat and Indigeneity in Indonesia: Culture and Entitlements Between Heteronomy and Self-ascription, 7, 2013, Göttingen Studies in Cultural Property.
27. Indrarto, G.B., Murharjanti, P., Khatarina, J., Pulungan, I., Ivalerina, F., Rahman, J., Prana, M.N., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Muharrom, E., The Context of REDD+ in Indonesia: Drivers Agents and Institutions, vol. 92, 2012, CIFOR.
28. KPA, 2014. Press Release: Agrarian Conflicts Resolution Must Be Jokowi-JK Priority (Press release).
29. Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., Putro, H., Forest Management Unit Development—Concept, Legislation and Implementation. 2011, Directorate of Area Management and Preparation of Forest Area Utilisation, Directorate General of Forestry Planning, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta.
30. Kayoi, M., Wells, A., Shepherd, G., 2006. Poverty and Natural Resource Conflict in Indonesian Papua: Reconciling Growth and Social Justice.
31. Kim, Y.S., Bae, J.S., Fisher, L.A., Latifah, S., Afifi, M., Lee, S.M., Kim, I.A., Indonesia's forest management units: effective intermediaries in REDD+ implementation?. Policy Econ. 62 (2016), 69–77.
32. Kusters, K., de Foresta, H., Ekadinata, A., Van Noordwijk, M., Towards solutions for state vs. local community conflicts over Forestland: the impact of formal recognition of user rights in Krui, Sumatra, Indonesia. Hum. Ecol. 35 (2007), 427–438, 10.1007/s10745-006-9103-4.
33. Li, T.M., Masyarakat adat, difference, and the limits of recognition in Indonesia's forest zone. Mod. Asian Stud., 35(03), 2001, 10.1017/s0026749x01003067.
34. Löffler, U., Land tenure developments in Indonesia. Deutsche Gesellschaft för Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), 1996.
35. Meijaard, E., Commentary: the final blow for Indonesia's forests?. Jakarta Globe(March), 2015 Retrieved from: http://jakartaglobe.beritasatu.com/opinion/commentary-final-blow-indonesias-forests/.
36. Mendoza, G.A., Prabhu, R., Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. For. Ecol. Manage. 207:1–2 (2005), 145–156, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.024.
37. Mukarom, M., Progress and problems tenurian handling efforts at West Rinjani KPH. Paper Presented at the Rapat Koordinasi Fasilitasi dan Media Permasalahan Tenurial di KPHL Rinjani Barat, Mataram, 2013.
38. Murdiyarso, D., Insight: merging environment and forestry ministries: Quo Vadis?. Jakarta Post(November), 2014 Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/11/07/insight-merging-environment-and-forestry-ministries-quo-vadis.html.
39. Naughton-Treves, L., Wendland, K., Land tenure and tropical forest carbon management. World Dev. 55 (2014), 1–6, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.010.
40. Newing, H., Conducting Research in Conservation: Social Science Methods and Practice. 2010, Routledge.
41. Nurdin, I., Resolving agrarian conflict through implementation of land reform by collaboration of CO and local government in Indonesia. Paper Presented at the 2014 World Bank Conference of Land and Poverty, Washington DC, 2014.
42. Nurjaya, I.N., Adat community land rights as defined within the State Agrarian Law of Indonesia: is it a genuine or psuedo-legal recognition?. US–China Law Rev., 8(4), 2011.
43. Ota, M., Can forest management units improve the management of state forests in Indonesia's Outer Islands? Institutional analysis and case studies from Lampung Province of Sumatra. Int. For. Rev. 17:1 (2015), 76–85, 10.1505/146554815814725121.
44. Pfund, J.-L., Landscape-scale research for conservation and development in the tropics: fighting persisting challenges. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2:1 (2010), 117–126.
45. Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Atmadja, S., Ekaputri, A.D., Intarini, D.Y., Indriatmoko, Y., Astri, P., Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia. World Dev. 55 (2014), 68–83, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.015.
46. Resosudarmo, I.A.P., 2014. Overview of Forest and Land Governance in Indonesia. Retrieved from Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan.
47. Robinson, B.E., Holland, M.B., Naughton-Treves, L., Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Glob. Environ. Change 29 (2014), 281–293, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.012.
48. Royo, N., Wells, A., Community based forest management in Indonesia: a review of current practice and regulatory frameworks. Background Paper for The Forest Dialogue on Investing in Locally Controlled Forestry (ILCF), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2012, 6–9.
49. Salim, T., One-map policy helps resolve land disputes, overlapping permits. Jakarta Post(December), 2014 Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/12/26/one-map-policy-helps-resolve-land-disputes-overlapping-permits.html.
50. Savath, V., Fletschner, D., Peterman, A., Santos, F., Land, Assets, and Livelihoods: Gendered Analysis of Evidence from Odisha State in India. 2014, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
51. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono, A.K., Day, M., Garcia, C., van Oosten, C., Buck, L., Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:21 (2013), 8349–8356.
52. Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A.K., Dale, A., Sunderland, T., Supriatna, J., Saryanthi, R., Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?. Sustainability Sci. 10:2 (2014), 345–355.
53. Siduaruk, R., Butarbutar, C.D., Preserving land rights in forestry areas. Indones. Legal Brief, 2014 (Producer). Retrieved from http://userfiles.hukumonline.com/adv/ILB2517_10112014.pdf.
54. Sirait, M.T., The Emergence of Forest Land Redistribution in Indonesia. 2009, World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF Southeast Asia Regional Office.
55. Sunderlin, W.D., Larson, A.M., Duchelle, A.E., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Huynh, T.B., Awono, A., Dokken, T., How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. World Dev. 55 (2014), 37–52.
56. Suryandari, E.Y., Sylviani, Role and coordination analysis of stakeholders in Forest Management Unit (FMU) management. J. Anal. Kebijak. Kehutan. 7:2 (2010), 227–246 (in Indonesian).
57. Suryandari, E.Y., Sylviani, Study of policy implementation of Forest Management Units (FMU) Organization in regency level: case study at Banjar FMU, South Kalimantan and Lahan Mangsang Medis FMU, South Sumatra. J. Anal. Kebijak. Kehutan. 9:2 (2012), 114–130 (in Indonesian).
58. Suyanto, S., Underlying cause of fire: different form of land tenure conflicts in Sumatra. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 12:1 (2006), 67–74, 10.1007/s11027-006-9039-4.
59. Thornburn, C.C., The plot thickens: land administration and policy in post-New Order Indonesia. Asia Pac. Viewp. 45:1 (2004), 33–49.
60. Toha, K., Collier, W., Land control, governance and agrarian conflict in Indonesia. Paper Presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington DC, 2015.
61. Wells, P., Franklin, N., Gunarso, P., Paoli, G., Mafira, T., Kusumo, D.R., Clanchy, B., Indonesian Constitutional Court Ruling Number 45/PUUIX/2011 in relation to forest lands—implications for forests, development and REDD+. Jakarta: Daemeter Consult./Tropenbos Int./Makarim Taira S, 2012.
62. Wollenberg, E., Iwan, R., Limberg, G., Moeliono, M., Rhee, S., Sudana, M., Facilitating cooperation during times of chaos: spontaneous orders and muddling through in Malinau District, Indonesia. Manag. For. Resour. Decent. Environ., 2007, 65.
63. Wright, G., Indigenous people and customary land ownership under domestic Redd frameworks: a case study of Indonesia. Law Environ. Dev. J., 7(2), 2012.
64. Xanthaki, A., Land rights of indigenous peoples in South-east Asia. Melb. J. Int. Law 4:2 (2003), 476–496.
65. Yasmi, Y., Guernier, J., Colfer, C.J.P., Positive and negative aspects of forestry conflict: lessons from a decentralized forest management in Indonesia. Int. For. Rev. 11:1 (2009), 98–110, 10.1505/ifor.11.1.98.
66. Yokota, Y., Harada, K., Oktalina, S., Putro, W., 2009. Participatory Approach in Teak Forest Management in Indonesia: A Case Study in Madiun East Java. JIRCAS Working Report (60), pp. 87–93.