Inviting end-of-life talk in initial CALM therapy sessions: A conversation analytic study

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 259-266

  Shaw, Chloe ^a   Chrysikou, Vasiliki ^a   Davis, Sarah ^a   Gessler, Sue ^a   Rodin, Gary ^b   Lanceley, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

CALM; Cancer; Conversation analysis; Death; End of life talk; Palliative care; Psychotherapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO ILLNESS; CANCER AND LIVING MEANINGFULLY THERAPY; CANCER PALLIATIVE THERAPY; CANCER THERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTEXT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION ANALYTIC STUDY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; END OF LIFE TALK; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERACTIONAL CONSTRAINT; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OPEN QUESTION DESIGN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL GROWTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SOCIAL ASPECT; SPIRITUAL WELL BEING; STUDY DESIGN; TREATMENT DURATION; WELLBEING; ATTITUDE TO DEATH; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NEOPLASM; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO DEATH; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; PALLIATIVE CARE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TERMINALLY ILL;

EID: 85009178461     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. [1] Rodin, G., Mackay, J.A., Zimmermann, C., Mayer, C., Howell, D., Katz, M., Sussman, J., Brouwers, M., Clinician-patient communication: a systematic review. Supportive Care Cancer 17 (2009), 627–644.
2. [2] Hales, S., Lo, C., Rodin, G., Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) therapy. Holland, J.C., Breitbart, W.S., Butow, P.N., Jacobsen, P.B., Loscalzo, M.J., McCorkle, R., (eds.) Psycho-Oncology, 2015, Oxford University Press, New York, 487–491.
3. [3] Lo, C., Hales, S., Jung, J., Chiu, A., Panday, T., Rydall, A., Nissim, R., Malfitano, C., Petricone-Westwood, D., Zimmermann, C., Rodin, G., Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM): phase 2 trial of a brief individual psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat. Med. 28:3 (2014), 234–242.
4. [4] Nissim, R., Freeman, E., Lo, C., Zimmermann, C., Gagliese, L., Rydall, A., Hales, S., Rodin, G., Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM): a qualitative study of a brief individual psychotherapy for individuals with advanced cancer. Palliat. Med. 26:5 (2012), 713–721.
5. [5] Heritage, J., Maynard, D.W., Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 1st ed., 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. [6] Gill, V.T., Roberts, F., Conversation analysis in medicine. Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, 575–592.
7. [7] Jefferson, G., Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Lerner, G., (eds.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 2004, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 13–32.
8. [8] Parry, R., Land, V., Seymour, J., How to communicate with patients about future illness progression and end of life: a systematic review. BMJ Supportive Palliat. Care 4:4 (2014), 331–341.
9. [9] Lutfey, K., Maynard, D.W., Bad news in oncology: how phyisician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words. Soc. Psychol. Q. 61 (1998), 321–341.
10. [10] Peräkylä, A., AIDS counselling: institutional interaction and clinical practice. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. [11] Pino, M., Parry, R., Victoria, L., Faull, C., Feathers, L., et al. Engaging terminally Ill patients in end of life talk: how experienced palliative medicine doctors navigate the dilemma of promoting discussions about dying. PLoS One, 11(5), 2016, e0156174, 10.1371/journal.pone.0156174.
12. [12] Beach, W.A., Anderson, J.K., Communication and cancer? Part I: the noticeable absence of interactional research. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 21 (2003), 1–23.
13. [13] Lo, C., Hales, S., Rydall, A., Panday, T., Chiu, A., Malfitano, C., Jung, J., Li, M., Nissim, R., Zimmermann, C., Rodin, G., Managing cancer and living meaningfully: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16, 2015, 391.
14. [14] Edwards, D., Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints. Discourse Stud. 7:1 (2005), 5–29.
15. [15] Hepburn, A., Bolden, G., The conversation analytic approach to transcription. Sidnell, J., Stivers, T., (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, 57–76.
16. [16] Drew, P., Conversation analysis. Fitch, K.L., Sanders, R.E., (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 71–102.
17. [17] Sidnell, J., Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. 2010, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
18. [18] Jefferson, G., Lee, J., The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. J. Pragmatics 5 (1981), 399–421.
19. [19] Schegloff, E., Sequencing in conversational openings. Am. Anthropol. 70:6 (1968), 1075–1095.
20. [20] Antaki, C., Formulations in psychotherapy. Antaki, C., Peräkylä, A., Vehviläinen, S., Leudar, I., (eds.) Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 26–42.
21. [21] Schegloff, E., Lerner, G., Beginning to respond: well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Res. Lang. Social Interact. 42 (2009), 91–115.
22. [22] Potter, J., Hepburn, A., Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. J. Pragmatics 42 (2010), 1543–1555.
23. [23] Shaw, C., Hepburn, A., Potter, J., Having the last laugh: on post completion laughter particles. Glenn, P., Holt, E., (eds.) On Laughing: Studies of Laughter in Interaction, 2012, Bloomsbury Academic, London, 91–106.
24. [24] Heritage, J., Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Res. Lang. Social Interact. 45 (2012), 1–29.
25. [25] Pomerantz, A., Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. Atkinson, J.M., Heritage, J., (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 1984, Cambridge University Press, New York, 57–101.
26. [26] Antaki, C., Wetherell, M., Showing concessions. Discourse Stud. 1 (1999), 7–27.
27. [27] Raymond, G., Grammar and social organization: yes/no Interrogatives and the structure of responding. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68 (2003), 939–1037.
28. [28] Stivers, T., Morality and question design: ‘of course’ as contesting a presupposition of askability. Stivers, T., Mondada, L., Steensig, J., (eds.) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 82–106.
29. [29] Palazzoli Selvini, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., Prata, G., Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Fam. Process 19 (1980), 3–12.
30. [30] Peräkylä, A., Vehviläinen, S., Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society 14 (2003), 727–750.