Novel acrylic/nanocellulose microsphere with improved adhesive properties

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

Volumn 74, Issue , 2017, Pages 100-106

  Kajtna, J ^a,b,c   Sebenik U ^c  

^a APC   (Slovenia)

^b Organik Kimya San ve Tic A   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

(A) pressure sensitive adhesives; (A) water based (M) peel adhesion; microsphere (not included in the list)

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; CELLULOSE; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS; FILLERS; GLASS TRANSITION; HYDROGEN BONDS; MICROSPHERES; PEELING; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); VISCOELASTICITY;

ADHESIVE PROPERTIES; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS (DMA); MEAN PARTICLE SIZE; POLYMER GLASS TRANSITION; PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVES; SUSPENSION POLYMERIZATION; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES; WATER BASED;

PARTICLE SIZE;

ADHESION; ADHESIVES; HYDROLYSIS; MIXTURES;

EID: 85009168541     PISSN: 01437496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. [1] Reddy, M.M., Vivekanandhan, S., Misra, M., Bhatia, S.K., Mohanty, A.K., Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: current status and future opportunities. Prog Polym Sci 38 (2013), 1653–1689.
2. [2] Moon, R.J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., Youngblood, J., Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40 (2011), 3941–3994.
3. [3] Dufresne, A., Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today, 16, 2013, 220 [27].
4. [4] Abdul Khalil HPS, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN, Mustapha A, Sudesh K, Dungani R, Jawaid M Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2014; 99: p. 649–65.
5. [5] Malmstrom, E., Carlmark, A., Controlled grafting of cellulose fibres - an outlook beyond paper and cardboard. Polym Chem 3 (2012), 1702–1713.
6. [6] Azizi Samir, M. a S., Alloin, F., Dufresne, A., Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6 (2005), 612–626.
7. [7] Wang, B., Sain, M., Isolation of nanofibers from soybean source and their reinforcing capability on synthetic polymers. Compos Sci Technol 67 (2007), 2521–2527.
8. [8] De Souza Lima, M.M., Borsali, R., Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure, properties, and applications. Macromol Rapid Commun 25 (2004), 771–787.
9. [9] Gardner, D.J., Oporto, G.S., Mills, R., Samir, M. a S.A., Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. J Adhes Sci Technol 22 (2008), 545–567.
10. [10] Bondeson, D., Oksman, K., Polylactic acid/cellulose whisker nanocomposites modified by polyvinyl alcohol. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 38 (2007), 2486–2492.
11. [11] Freire, C.S.R., Silvestre, A.J.D., Neto, C.P., Gandini, A., Martin, L., Mondragon, I., Composites based on acylated cellulose fibers and low-density polyethylene: effect of the fiber content, degree of substitution and fatty acid chain length on final properties. Compos Sci Technol 68 (2008), 3358–3364.
12. [12] Ljungberg, N., Bonini, C., Bortolussi, F., Boisson, C., Heux, L., Cavaillé, New nanocomposite materials reinforced with cellulose whiskers in atactic polypropylene: effect of surface and dispersion characteristics. Biomacromolecules 6 (2005), 2732–2739.
13. [13] Oksman, K., Mathew, A.P., Bondeson, D., Kvien, I., Manufacturing process of cellulose whiskers/polylactic acid nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66 (2006), 2776–2784.
14. [14] Favier, V., Canova, G.R., Cavaillé, J.Y., Chanzy, H., Dufresne, A., Gauthier, C., Nanocomposite materials from latex and cellulose whiskers. Polym Adv Technol 6 (1995), 351–355.
15. [15] Pu, Y., Zhang, J., Elder, T., Deng, Y., Gatenholm, P., Ragauskas, A.J., Investigation into nanocellulosics versus acacia reinforced acrylic films. Compos B: Eng 38 (2007), 360–366.
16. [16] Mabrouk, A.B., Salon, M.C.B., Magnin, A., Belgacem, M.N., Boufi, S., Cellulose-based nanocomposites prepared via mini-emulsion polymerization: understanding the chemistry of the nanocellulose/matrix interface. Colloids Surf A: Physiochem Eng Asp 448 (2014), 1–8.
17. [17] Aranguren, M.I., Marcovich, N.E., Salgueiro, W., Somoza, A., Effect of the nano-cellulose content on the properties of reinforced polyurethanes. A study using mechanical tests and positron anihilation spectroscopy. Polym Test 32 (2013), 115–122.
18. [18] Kaboorani, A., Riedl, B., Blanchet, P., Fellin, M., Hosseinaei, O., Wang, S., Nanocrystalline cellulose (ncc): a renewable nano-material for polyvinyl acetate (pva) adhesive. Eur Polym J 48 (2012), 1829–1837.
19. [19] Cho, M.-J., Park, B.-D., Tensile and thermal properties of nanocellulose-reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 17 (2011), 36–40.
20. [20] Chirayil, C.J., Mathew, L., Hassan, P.A., Mozetic, M., Thomas, S., Rheological behaviour of nanocellulose reinforced unsaturated polyester nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 69 (2014), 274–281.
21. [21] Kajtna, J., Sebenik, U., Microsphere pressure sensitive adhesives-acrylic polymer/montmorillonite clay nanocomposite materials. Int J Adhes Adhes 29 (2009), 543–550.
22. [22] Finat technical handbook, FINAT, The Hague; 2001.
23. [23] Kajtna, J., Golob, J., Krajnc, M., The effect of polymer molecular weight and crosslinking reactions on the adhesion properties of microsphere water-based acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 29 (2009), 186–194.
24. [24] Kajtna, J., Likozar, B., Golob, J., Krajnc, M., The influence of the polymerization on properties of an ethylacrylate/2-ethyl hexylacrylate pressure-sensitive adhesive suspension. Int J Adhes Adhes 28 (2008), 382–390.