Evidence for demodulation in speech perception

6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Traunmüller, Hartmut ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMODULATION; MODULATION;

LINGUISTIC VARIABLE; MODULATION THEORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85009069238     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Traunmüller, H. "Conventional, biological and environmental factors in speech communication: A modulation theory", Phonetica, Vol. 51:170-183, 1994.
2. 0 in vowel perception", http://www.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/i.htm, 1998.
3. Fant, G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, Mouton, The Hague, 1960.
4. Meltzoff A. N. and Moore K. "Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates", Science, Vol. 198:75-78, 1977.
5. Kuhl, P. K. and Meltzoff, A. N. "The Intermodal Representation of Speech in Infants", Infant Behavior and Development, Vol. 7:361-381, 1984.
6. Kuhl, P. K., and Meltzoff, A. N. "Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vowel imitation and developmental change", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 100:2425-2439, 1996.
7. Studdert-Kennedy, M. "On learning to speak", Human Neurobiology, Vol. 2:191-195, 1983.
8. Porter R. J., and Lubker J. F. "Rapid reproduction of vowelvowel sequences: evidence for a fast and direct acousticmotoric linkage in speech", J. Speech Hearing Res., Vol. 23:593-602, 1980.
9. Ladefoged P. and Broadbent, D. E. "Information conveyed by vowels", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 29:98-104, 1957.
10. Broadbent, D. E., and Ladefoged, P. "Vowel judgements and adaptation level", Proc. Roy. Soc. B 151, 1960.
11. Mann, V. A., and Repp, B. H. "Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [6]-[s] distinction", Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 28:213-228, 1980.
12. Creelman, C. D. "The case of the unknown talker", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 29:655, 1957.
13. Strange, W., Verbrugge, R. R., Shankweiler, D. P., and Edman, T. R. "Consonant environment specifies vowel identity", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 60:213-224, 1976.
14. Mullenix, J. M., Pisoni, D. B. and Martin, C. S. "Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 85:365-378, 1989.
15. Pisoni, D. B. "Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning", Speech Comm., Vol. 13:109-125, 1993.
16. Mullenix, J. M., and Pisoni, D. B. "Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception", Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 47:379-390, 1990.
17. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., and Pisoni, D. B. "Speech perception as a talker contingent process", Psychol. Sci., Vol. 5:42-46, 1995.
18. Van Lancker, D., Kreiman, J., and Emmorey, K. "Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part I: Recognition of backward voices and Part II: Recognition of ratealtered voices", J. Phonetics, Vol. 13:19-52, 1985.
19. Eriksson, A., and Traunmüller, H. "Perception of vocal effort and distance from the speaker on the basis of vowel utterances" (submitted).
20. Gussenhoven, C., and Rietveld, T. "On the speakerdependence of the perceived prominence of F0 peaks", J. Phonetics, Vol. 26:371-380, 1998.
21. 0 excursions in speech as evidenced in liveliness estimations", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 97:1905-1915, 1995.