On the speaker-dependence of the perceived prominence of F0 peaks

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 371-380

  Gussenhoven, Carlos ^a   Rietveld, Toni ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032186472     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1998.0080     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Beckman, M. E. (1995) Local shapes and global trends. Proceedings International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Vol. II, 100-107
2. Bezooijen, R. van (1996) Socio-cultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38, 253-265
3. Elmlund, M., Frehr, I. & Petersen, N. H. (1992) Formant transformation from male to female synthetic voices. Proceedings International Conference on Speech and Language Processing, Banff, Vol. II, 1187-1190
4. Glave, R. D. & Rietveld, A. C. M. (1975) Is the effort dependence of speech loudness explicable on the basis of acoustical cues? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, 875-879
5. Gussenhoven, C. & Rietveld, T. (1997) Empirical evidence for the contrast between L * and H * in Dutch rising contours. In A. Botinis et al. (eds), Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications, Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop. Grenoble: European Speech Communication Association. 169-172
6. Gussenhoven, C., Repp, B. H., Rietveld, A., Rump, H. H. & Terken, J. (1997) The perceptual prominence of fundamental frequency peaks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3009-3022
7. Heuven, V. J. van & Menert, L. (1996) Why stress position bias? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 2439-2451
8. Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. E. (1957) Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98-104
9. Ladd, D. R. & R. Morton (1997) The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical? Journal of Phonetics, 25, 313-342
10. Leather, J. (1983) Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 373-382
11. Pierrehumbert, J. (1979) The perception of fundamental frequency declination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 363-369
12. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980) The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. PhD dissertation MIT. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1990.
13. Rietveld, A. C. M. & C. Gussenhoven (1985) On the relation between pitch excursion size and prominence. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 299-308
14. 0 targets when "speaking up". In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia. Supplement pp. 1-4
15. Silverman, K. A. E. (1987) The structure and processing of fundamental frequency contours. PhD dissertation Cambridge
16. Streefkerk, B. M., Pols, L. C. W. and Ten Bosch, L. F. M. (1997). Prominence in read aloud sentences, as marked by listeners and classified automatically. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam, 21, 101-116
17. Terken, J. (1991) Fundamental frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 1768-1776
18. Traunmüller, H. (1988) Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels. Phonetica, 45, 1-29
19. 0 excursions in speech as evidenced in liveliness estimations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97 (no. 3, March), 1905-1915
20. Vogten, L. (1985). Handleiding No. 67. LVS-Speech Processing Programs on IPO VAX 11/780. Eindhoven: Institute of Perception Research