Interpreting interpretation: Gender, sexuality and the practice of not reading straight?

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 331-345

  Bloom, Leslie Rebecca ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008858308     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095183999236015     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bloom, L. R. (1992). “How can we know the dancer from the dance?” Discourses of the self-body. Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 15(4), 313-334.
2. Bloom, L. R. (1993). Shot through with streams of songs: Explorations of feminist methodology and interpretation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
3. Bloom, L. R. (1996). Stories of one’s own: Nonunitary subjectivity in narrative representation. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 176-187.
4. Bloom, L. R. (1997).Locke din uneasy sisterhood: reflections on feminist methodology and research relations. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 28(1), 111-122.
5. Bloom, L. R. (1998). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6. Bloom, L. R. & M unro, P. (1995). Conflicts of selves: Non-unitary subjectivity in women administrators’ life history narratives In A. Hatch & R.W isniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 99-112). London: Falmer Press.
7. Britzman, D. P. (1995). Is there a queer pedagogy? Or, stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45(2), 151-165.
8. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
9. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York and London: Routledge.
10. Davies, B. (1992). W omen’s subjectivity and feminist stories. In C. Ellis & M.G. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 53-76). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. de Lauretis, T. (1987). T echnologies of gender: Essays on theory, fi lm, andfiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. de Lauretis, T. (1994). T he practice of love: Lesbian sexuality and perverse desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Ferguson, K. E. (1993). The man question: Visions of subjectivity in feminist theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Firestein, B. A. (1996). Bisexuality as paradigm shift: Transforming our disciplines. In Firestein, B. A., Bisexuality: T he psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 263-291). Thousand Oaks, C A: Sage.
15. Flax, J. (1993). Multiples: On the contemporary politics of subjectivity. Human Studies, 16, 33-49.
16. Freud, S. (1966). The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (J. Strachey, Ed. and Trans.). New Y ork: W. W. Norton.
17. Gibian, R. (1992). Refusing certainty: Toward a bisexuality of wholeness.InE. R. Weise (Ed.), Closertohome: Bisexuality and feminism (pp. 3-16). Seattle: Seal Press.
18. Gordon, D. (1983). From where I stand: A case for feminist bisexuality. In S. Cartledge & J. Ryan, (Eds.), Sex & love: New thoughts on old contradictions (pp. 141-156). London: Women’s Press.
19. Grosz, E. (1994). The labors of love. Analyzing perverse desire: an interrogation of Teresa de Lauretis’s “The Practice of Love.” Differences, 6(2-3), 274-296.
20. Heilbrun, C. (1988). Writinga womans life. New York: W. W. Norton.
21. Hemming, C. (1995). Locating bisexual identities: Discourses of bisexuality and contemporary feminist theory. In D. Bell & G. Valentine (Eds.), Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities (pp. 41-55). New York and London: Routledge.
22. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.). (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulations and subjectivity. London and New York: Methuen.
23. Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227-263). London and New York: Methuen.
24. Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. Newbury Park, C A: Sage.
25. Jacobs, M., M unro, P., & Adams, N. (1995). Palimpsest: (Re) reading women’s lives. Qualitative Inquiry, 1 (3), 327-345.
26. Khayatt, M. D. (1992). Lesbian teachers: An invisible presence. Albany: State University of New Y ork Press.
27. Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. Newbury Park: Sage.
28. Kitzinger, C. (1989). The discursive construction of identities. In J. Shot ter & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), T exts of Identities. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Knopf, M. J. (1996). Bi-nary bi-sexuality: Jane Bowle’s T wo Serious Ladies. In D. E. Hall & M. Pramaggiore (Eds.), PrePresenting bisexualities: Subjects and cultures of fluid desire (pp. 142-164). New York: New Y ork University Press.
30. Laskey, L. & Beavis, C. (1996). Schooling & sexualities. Victoria, Australia: Deakin Centre for Education and Change, Deakin University.
31. Mama, A. (1995). Beyond the masks: Race, gender and subjectivity. London: Routledge.
32. Mulqueen, M. (1992). On our own terms: Redefining competence and femininity. Albany, NY: State University of N ew Y ork Press.
33. Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography, politics and sexuality: Essays in curriculum theory 1972-1992. New York: Peter Lang.
34. Pinar, W. F. (1998). Queer theory in education. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
35. Pramaggiore, M. (1996). BI-ntroduction I: Epistemologies of the fence. In M. Pramaggiore & D. E Hall (Eds.), PrePresenting bisexualities: Subjects and cultures of fluid desire (pp. 1-7). New York: New York University Press.
36. Rust, P. C. (1992). The politics of sexual identity: Sexual attract ion and behavior among lesbian and bisexual women. Social Problems, 39(4), 366-386.
37. Rust, P. C. (1995). Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics: Sex, loyalty, and revolution. New York: New York University Press.
38. Rust, P. C. (1996). Monogamy and polyamory: Relationship issues for bisexuals. In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: T he psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 127-148). Thousand Oaks, C A: Sage.
39. Scheurich, J. J. & Young, M. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
40. Sears, J. T. (Ed.). (1992). Sexuality and the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Smith, S. (1993). Subjectivity, identity, and the body: W omen' s autobiographical practices in the twentieth century. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42. St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175-189.
43. Tallen, B. (1990). How inclusive is feminist political theory?: Questionsfor lesbians. In J. Allen (Ed.), Lesbian philosophies and cultures (pp. 241-258). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
44. Trask, H. (1986). Eros and power: The promise offeminist theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
45. Trudell, B. (1993). Doing sex education. London and New York: Routledge.
46. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
47. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.