Distributed cognition: A framework for understanding the role of computers in classroom teaching and learning

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 271-279

  Angeli, Charoula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008843093     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2008.10782508     Document Type: Note

References (43)

1. Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193-197.
2. Brown, A. L., Ash, D, Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A, & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195-202.
4. Cobb, P. (1998). Learning from distributee theories of intelligence. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 51(3), 187-204.
5. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press
6. Crook, C. (1996). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. New York: Routledge.
7. Giere, R. N. (2006). The role of agency in distributed cognitive systems. Philosophy of Science, 73, 710-719.
8. Haugeland, J. (1998), Having thought. Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196.
10. Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers Its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
13. Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1998). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. M. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Mac-Millan.
15. Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more wails, Thecry change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (pp. 165-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Kozma, R. B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts on writing processes and products of novice and advanced college writers. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 1-27.
17. Lajoie, S. P. (1993). Cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 261-289). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Lajoie, S. P. (2003). Individual differences in spatial ability: Developing tech-nologies to increase strategy awareness and skills. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 115-125.
19. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-83). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participa-tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Littleton, K., & Light, P. (Eds.). (1999). Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction. New York: Routledge.
23. Liu, M., & Bera, S. (2005). An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hy-permedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 5-21.
24. Moll, L. C., Tapia, J., & Whitmore, K. F. (1993). Living knowledge: The social distribution of cultural resources for thinking. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 139-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using computers to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.
27. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
29. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88-110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
31. Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Resnick, L. B., Levine J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Rogers, Y. (1997). A brief introduction to distributed cognition. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/yrogers/papers/dcog/dcog-brief-intro.pdf.
34. Rogers, Y. (2006) Distributed Cognition and Communication. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics 2nd ed. (pp. 181-202). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
35. Saljo, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 144-161). New York: Routledge.
36. Salomon, G. (1992). New challenges for educational research: Studying the individual within learning environments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 167-182.
37. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational consid-erations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent Technologies. Educational Re-searcher, 20(3), 2-9.
39. Steketee, C. (2006). Modelling ICT integration in teacher education courses using distributed cognition as framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 126-144.
40. Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361-384). Berlin: Springer.
41. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological pro-cesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2007). Multimedia resources to bridge :he praxis gap: Modeling practice in elementary science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(3), 349-375.
43. Wijekumar K. J., Meyer, B. J. F., Wagoner, D., & Ferguson, L. (2006). Technology affordances: The ‘real story in research with K—12 and undergraduate learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 191-209.