Serial Organizational Monogamy: Building Trust into Contractual Relationships

International Review of Public Administration

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 39-51

  Greve, Carsten ^a   Ejersbo, Niels ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008841966     PISSN: 12294659     EISSN: 2331795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2002.10804991     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Almquist, R. 2000. "Management by Contracten studieutifra°n programmatiska och teknologiska aspekter." Kommunal Ekonomi Och Politik 4 (1): 53-82.
2. Bachmann, R, D. Knights and J. Sydow. 2001. "Editorial." Organization Studies 22 (2).
3. Barney, J.B. and W. Hesterly. 1996. "Organizational Economics. Understanding the Relationship Between Organizations and Economic Analysis." In Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord, 115-147. London, Sage.
4. Bryntse, K. 2000. "Kontraktstyrning I teori och praktik." Lund: Lund Business Press.
5. Clegg, S. and C. Hardy. 1996. "Conclusion: Representations." In Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord, 676-708. London, Sage.
6. Collin, S-E.1998. "In the Twilight Zone. A Survey of Public-Private Partnerships in Sweden." Public Productivity and Management Review 21 (3): 272-283.
7. Copenhagen, City of. 1999. Udbudspolitik for Københavns Kommune. Danish Ministry of the Interor/PLS Consult.1996. Erfaringer med udbud ogudlicitering. Copenhagen
8. Danish Ministry of the Interior. Danish National Association of Local Governments. 2000. Udbud og udlicitering I kommunerne. Copenhagen
9. Eimicke, W. 2000. San Diego County's Innovation Program. The Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
10. Eisner, M.A., J. Worsham and E. Ringquist. 1996. "Crossing the Organizational Void: The Limits of Agency Theory in the Analysis of Regulatory Control." Governance. An International Journal of Policy and Administration 9 (4): 407-428.
11. Fortin, Y. and H. van Hassel, eds. 2000. Contracting in the New Public Management. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
12. Fromm, J. and E. Torsøe. 2000. Konkurranseutsettning av bydelenes pleieog omsorgstjeneste I Oslo - en sentralisert og politisert model? Oslo: Handelshøyskolen BI.
13. Greene, J.D. 2002. Cities and Privatization. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
14. Greve, C. 2000. "Governance by Contact. Creating Public Private Partnerships in Denmark." In Contract ing in the New Public Management, edited by Y. Fortin and H. van Hassel, 49-66. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
15. Greve, C. 2001. "New Avenues for Contracting Out and Implications for a Theoretical Framework." Public Performance and Management Review 24 (3): 270-284.
16. Greve, C and N. Ejersbo. 2001. "Den offentlige sektor pa° kontrakt. Temaer, tendenser og udfordringer." In Modernisering av offentlig sektor, edited by T. Busch et.al., 185-200. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
17. Grey, C. and C. Garsten. 2001. "Trust, Control and Postbureaucracy." Organization Studies 22 (2): 229-250.
18. Hegnsvad, M. 2001. "Udlicitering kræver styring og ledelse." In Offentlig ledelse pa dagsordenen, edited by K.K. Klausen and S. Hildebrandt, 125-138. Copenhagen: Borsens forlag.
19. Herbst, D. and D. Seader. 2000. "Providing Public Services Through Long-Term Service Agreements." In Local Government Innovation, edited by R.A. Johnson and N. Waltzer, 105-122. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
20. ICMA.1999. Contracting for Service Delivery: Local Government Choices. Washington, DC.
21. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. H. 1986. [1976]. "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure." In Organizational Economics, edited by J.B. Barney and W. Ouchi, 214- 275. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Johnson, R.A. and Waltzer, N. Eds. 2000. Local Government Innovation. Issues and Trends in Privati - zation and Managed Competition. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
23. Kettl, D. 1993. Sharing Power. Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC: Brookings.
24. Lane, J-E. 2000. New Public Management. London. Routledge.
25. Linder, S. 1999. "Coming to Terms with the Public- Private Partnership. A Grammar of Multiple Meanings." The American Behavioral Scientist 43 (1): 35-51.
26. OECD. 1997. Best Practice for Contacting Out. Paris: OECD.
27. Organization Studies. 2001. Special Issue: Trust and Control in Organizational Relations 22 (2).
28. Parsons, W.1995. Public Policy. London: Edward Elgar.
29. PLS Rambøll Management. 2001. Ütvardering av konkurrenceutsättning inom Stockholms stad Stockholm: Schultz.
30. Reed, M. 2001. "Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis." Organization Studies 22 (2): 201-228
31. Savas, E.S. 2000. Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
32. Sizer, Ed. 2000. "Impact on Public Organizational Structure and Behaviour: Managed Competition and Privatization." In Local Government Innovation, edited by R.A. Johnson and N. Waltzer, 210-235. Westport, Conn: Quorum Books.
33. Svensson, M. and P.G. Edelbalk,. 2001. 90-taletsanbudskonkurrens iäldreomsorgennagra utvecklingstendenser. Lund: IHE Arbetsrapport 2001: 1
34. U.S. General Accounting Office.1997. Lessons Learned by State and Local Governments.
35. Wallin, B. 1997. "The Need for a Privatization Process. Lessons from Development and Implementation." Public Administration Review 57 (1): 11-20.