The observed construction of teaching: Four contexts

Journal of Research in Childhood Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 148-161

  Mc William, R A ^a   Kruif, Renée E L De ^a   Zulli, Rebecca A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008835143     PISSN: 02568543     EISSN: 21502641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02568540209594981     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akhtar, N., Dunham, F., & Dunham, P. J. (1991). Directive interactions and early vocabulary development: The role of joint attentional focus. Child Language, 18, 41-49.
2. Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (exp. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
3. Bredekamp, S., & Coppie, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (1992). Reaching potentials through appropriate curriculum: Conceptual frameworks for applying guidelines. In S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant (Eds.), Reaching potentials: Appropriate cur-riculum and assessment for young children (pp. 28-42). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Cavallaro, C. C., Haney, M., & Cabello, B. (1993). Developmental^ appropriate strategies for promoting full participation in early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(3), 293-317.
7. Elliott, A., & Hall, N. (1997). The impact of selfregulatory teaching strategies on “at-risk” preschoolers’ mathematical learning in a computer-mediated environment. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 187-198.
8. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
10. Holloway, S. D. (1999). Divergent cultural models of child rearing and pedagogy in Japanese preschools. In E. Turiel (Ed.), Development and cultural change: Reciprocal processes (pp. 61-75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Juan, S. (1985). The Yoji Gakuen: The Suzuki philosophy in the preschool. Childhood Education, 62, 38-39.
12. Katims, D. S. (1994). Emergence of literacy in preschool children with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 58-69.
13. MacKay, T., & Watson, K. (1999). Literacy, social disadvantage and early intervention: Enhancing reading achievement in primary school. Educational and Child Psychology, 16(1), 30-36.
14. Mahoney, G., & Neville-Smith, A. (1996). The effects of directive communications on children’s interactive engagement: Implications for language intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 236-250.
15. Marfo, K. (1991). The maternal directiveness theme in mother-child interaction research: Implications for early intervention. In K. Marfo (Ed.), Early intervention in transition. Current perspectives on programs for handicapped children (pp. 177-203). New York: Praeger.
16. Marfo, K. (1992). Correlates of maternal directiveness with children who are developmentally delayed. American Journal of Or-thopsychiatry, 62, 219-233.
17. McCathren, R. B., Yoder, P. J., & Warren, S. F. (1995). The role of directiveness in early language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 91-101.
18. McWilliam, R. A., & Bailey, D. B. (1992). Promoting engagement and mastery. In D. B. Bailey & M. Wolery (Eds.), Teaching infants and preschoolers with disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 230-255). New York: MacMillan.
19. McWilliam, R. A. (1992). Family-centered intervention planning: A routines-based approach. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
20. McWilliam, R. A., & Bailey, D. B. (1995). Effects of classroom social structure and disability on engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 123-147.
21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Odom, S. L., Horn, E. M., Marquart, J. M., Hanson, M. J., Wolfberg, P., Beckman, P., Lieber, J., Li, S., Schwartz, J., Janko, S., & Sandall, S. (1999). On the forms of inclusion: Organizational context and individualized service models. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 185-199.
23. Pine, J. M. (1992). Maternal style at the early one-word stage: Re-evaluating the stereotype of the directive mother. First Language, 12, 169-186.
24. Ridley, S. L., McWilliam, R. A., & Oates, C. S. (2000). Observed engagement as an indicator of child care program quality. Early Education & Development, 11, 143-146.
25. Santos, R. M., & Lignugaris Kraft, B. (1997). Integrating research on effective instruction with instruction in the natural environment for young children with disabilities. Exceptionality, 7, 97-129.
26. Warren, S. F., & Kaiser, A. P. (1986). Incidental language teaching: A critical view. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 291-298.
27. Wolery, M., & Bredekamp, S. (1994). Developmentally appropriate practice and young children with special needs: Contextual issues in the discussion. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 331-341.