If not here, where? Understanding teachers' use of technology in silicon valley schools

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-64

  Hernández Ramos, Pedro ^a  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructivist beliefs; K 12 teachers; Teacher preparation; Teachers' use of technology; Technology integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008813603     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782449     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Speiglman, A. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Education Research Journal 41(3), 557-603.
2. Anderson, R., & Dexter, S. (2003). Exemplary technology-supported schooling cases in the USA [Web site]. Retrieved October 17, 2004 from http://edtechcases.info/schools.htm.
3. Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow (ACOT). (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning & technology. A report on 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Author.
4. Beaudry, J. S. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students. Use of laptop computers and classroom assessment: Are teachers making the connections? Research Report #4. Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine Office.
5. Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26(3), 291-322.
6. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives 8(51). Available: http://epaa.asu.edu.
7. Boethel, M., & Dimock, K. V. (1999). Constructing knowledge with technology. A review of the literature. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(4), 411-434.
10. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught. Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890-1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
12. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal 38(4), 813-834.
13. Dwyer, D., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990a). Teacher beliefs and practices. Part I: Patterns of change. The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms. First-fourth year findings. Cupertino, CA: Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow.
14. Dwyer, D., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990b). Teacher belief and practices. Part II: Support for change. The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms. First-fourth year findings. Cupertino, CA: Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow.
15. Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research & Development 47(4), 47-61.
16. Fisher, C., Dwyer, D., & Yocam, K. (1996). Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2000). Creating a new community school. San Rafael, CA: Author. Retrieved October 14, 2004 from http://www.edutopia.org/php/article.php?id=Art_410.
18. Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Center for Technology in Education, Bank Street College of Education.
19. Hamilton, L. S., Klein, S. P., & Lorie, W (2000) Using web-based testing in large-scale assessment. Santa Monica: RAND Education.
20. Henrico County Public Schools. (2004). Teaching and learning initiative [Online document]. Retrieved March 14, 2005 from http://www.henrico.kl2.va.us/iBook/.
21. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
22. Kerr, K. A., Pane, J. F., & Barney, H. (2003). Quaker Valley Digital School District. Early effects and plans for future evaluations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
23. Marcinkiewickz, H. R. (1993-1994). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26(2), 220-236.
24. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new. Thinking about communications in the late nineteenth century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Murray, C. (2004) Teachers: Limited time, access cut school tech use. ESchool News online. Retrieved June 24, 2004 from http://eschoolnews.com/news/PF-showstory.cfm?ArticleID=5131.
26. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)—Technology in Schools Task Force. (2002). Technology in schools. Suggestions, tools, and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education. Washington, DC: Author.
27. Norris, D., Mason, J., & Lefrere, P. (2004). Experiencing knowledge. Innovate Journal of Online Education, (1)1. Available: http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php.
28. Ringstaff, C., & Kelly, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review of findings from research. San Francisco: WestEd.
29. Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching. (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH and Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
30. Sandholtz, J. H. & Reilly, B. (2004). Teachers, not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teachers College Record 106(3), 487-512.
31. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Santa Clara County Office of Education. (2005). Facts about Santa Clara county public schools [Online document]. Retrieved February 20, 2005 from http://www.sccoe.org/newsandfacts/sccpublicschools/.
33. Silvernail, D. L., & Lane, D. M. M. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students. Phase one summary evidence. Research report #1. Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine Office.
34. Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36(3), 253-265.
35. Yammarino, F., Skinner, S., & Childers, T. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 55(4), 613-640.
36. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal 40(4t), 807-840.
37. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record 104(3), 482-515.