The leeway of qualitative educational research: A case study

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 757-769

  Dam, Geert Ten ^a   Volman, Monique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008756664     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390110078422     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bartlett, L. (1994). Qualitative research in Australia. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(3), 207-225.
2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Brandsma, H. P. (1993). Basisschoolkenmerken en de kwaliteit van het onderwijs. [Primary school characteristics and the quality of education.] Groningen: RION.
4. Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
5. Creemers, B. P. M., & Reezigt, G. J. (1996). Common elements in theories about effective instruction (draft).
6. Davies, B. (1989). Education for sexism: A theoretical analysis of the sex/gender bias in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 21(1), 1-9.
7. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass. Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
9. Eisner, E. W., & Peshkin, A. (Eds.) (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education. The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Erickson, F. (1987). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
11. Harbers, H. (1986). Sociale wetenschappen en hun speelruimte [Social sciences and their latitude]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
12. Hetebrij, M. (1983). De ontwikkeling van researchprogramma’s als methodisch probleem. [The development of research programmes as a methodologicalproblem.] Amsterdam: VU Boekhandel/Uitgeverij.
13. Hofman, W. H. A. (1993). Effectief onderwijs aan allochtone leerlingen. [Effective education for pupils from ethnic minorities.] Delft: Eburon.
14. Kenway, J. (1993). Learning from girls: What can girls teach feminist teachers? In L. Yates (Ed.) Feminism and education (pp. 63-77). Melbourne: LaTrobe University Press.
15. Kenway, J., Willis, S., Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L. (1994). Making “hope practical” rather than “despair convincing”: Feminist post-structuralism, gender reform and educational change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15, 187-210.
16. Kelchtermans, G., Vandenberghe, R., & Schratz, M. (1994). The development of qualitative research: efforts and experiences from continential Europe. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(3), 239-255.
17. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.
18. LeCompte, M. D. (1997). Trends in Qualitative Research Methods. In L. J. Saha (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the sociology of education (pp. 246-263). Oxford/New York/Tokyo: Pergamon.
19. Leune, J. M. G. (1994). Onderwijssociologie en onderwijsbeleid in Nederland; sporen van onderwijssocio-logische inzichten in beleidsnota’s op het terrein van onderwijs en wetenschappen in de periode 1970-1992. [Sociology of education and educational policy in the Netherlands; elements of educational-sociological insights into policy memoranda in the field of education and science in the period 1970-1992.] Pedagogische Studien, 71, 271-283.
20. Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (1994). Researching politics and the politics of research: recent qualitative studies in the UK. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(3), 269-285.
21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1995). Educational research and development. Trends, issues and challenges. Paris: OECD.
22. Reynolds, D., & Packer, A. (1992). School effectiveness: Research, policy and practice (pp. 171-187). London: Cassell.
23. Reynolds, D., & Stoll, L. (1997). Merging school effectiveness and school improvement: the knowledge bases. In D. Reynolds, B. Creemers, R. Bollen, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll, & N. Lagerweij (Eds.), Making good schools, linking school effectiveness and school improvement. London: Routledge.
24. Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1989). Conceptualizing school effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 691-706.
25. Scheerens, J. (1994). Inventory of educational research in the Netherlands. Dutch contribution to the EC project on Inventory of Research in Education. Enschede: OCTO.
26. Smaling, A. (1987). Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek [Methodological objectivity and qualitative research]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
27. Smeyers, P., & Levering, B. (Eds.) (1998). Interpretatief onderzoek in pedagogiek en onderwijskunde. Inleiding op het themanummer. [Interpretative research in pedagogy and educational theory. Introduction to a specialIssue.] Pedagogisch Tijdschrift, 23(4/5), 177-180.
28. Smith, M. L. (1987). Publishing qualitative research. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 173-184.
29. Stanworth, M. (1981). Gender and schooling. A study of sexual divisions in the classroom. London: Women’s Research and Resources Centre.
30. Ten Dam, G., Van Eck, E., & Volman, M. (1992). Onderwijs en sekse. Een verkenning van researchprogramma’s. [Education and gender. A survey of research programmes.] ’s-Gravenhage: DCE/STEO.
31. Ten Dam, G., Van Eck, E., & Volman, M. (1997). Research programmes on gender and education: results and conceptualizations. European Journal of Educational Research, 32(4), 411-425.
32. Vander Werf, M. P. C., Weide, M. G., & Tesser, P. (1991). Het onderwijsvoorrangsbeleid in de school en in de klas. De eerste meting in het basisonderwijs. [The educational priority policy in the school and the classroom. The rst evaluation in primary education. Groningen/Nijmegen: RION/ITS.
33. Van Erp, M., Deckers, P., Koopman, P., & Robijns, M. (1992). Overeenkomst en verschil. [Agreement and difference.] Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.
34. Volman, M., & Ten Dam, G. T. M. (1998). Equal but different: contradictions in the development of gender identity in the nineties. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(4), 529-545.
35. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30-43.
36. Wardekker, W. (1998). Criteria for the quality of inquiry. Paper presented at the 4th ISCRAT Conference, Aarhus (DK), June 8.
37. Weide, M. G. (1995). Effectief basisonderwijs voor allochtone leerlingen. [Effective primary education for pupils from ethnic minorities., & Groningen: GION.
38. Weiner, G. (1994). Feminisms in Education. An introduction. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
39. Wesselingh, A. (1996). The Dutch sociology ofeducation: its origins, signi cance and future. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 213-226.
40. Whyte, J., Deem, R., Kant, L, & Cruickshank, M. (1985). Girl friendly schooling. London: Methuen.