Stability metrics for multi-source biomedical data based on simplicial projections from probability distribution distances

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 312-336

  Sáez, Carlos ^a,b   Robles, Montserrat ^a   García Gómez, Juan M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b University of Porto   (Portugal)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA FE   (Spain)

Author keywords

data quality; data reuse; data variability; information geometry; probability distribution distances

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENCHMARKING; COST; DIGITAL IMAGING; EARTH MOVER DISTANCE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ENTROPY; HUMAN; JENSEN SHANNON DISTANCE; KERNEL METHOD; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION DISTANCE; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATASETS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; PROBABILITY;

EID: 85008712403     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280214545122     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. McMurry AJ, Murphy SN, MacFadden D, et al. SHRINE: Enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (3): e55811-e55811.
2. Sáez C, Robles M and García-Gómez JM. Comparative study of probability distribution distances to define a metric for the stability of multi-source biomedical research data. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th annual international conference of the IEEE, Osaka, Japan: IEEE, 2013, pp. 3226-3229.
3. Wang RY, Strong DM,. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J Manage Inf Syst 1996; 12 (4): 5-33.
4. Cruz-Correia RJ, Pereira Rodrigues P, Freitas A, et al.Data quality and integration issues in electronic health records. In: Hristidis V, (ed). Information discovery on electronic health records, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC 2009, 2010, pp. 55-96.
5. Weiskopf NG, Weng C,. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (1): 144-151.
6. Sáez C, Martínez-Miranda J, Robles M, et al. Organizing data quality assessment of shifting biomedical data. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 180: 721-725.
7. Asuncion A and Newman DJ. UCI Machine Learning Repository;. University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/ (accessed 27 March 2014).
8. Detrano R, Janosi A, Steinbrunn W, et al. International application of a new probability algorithm for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 304-310.
9. Markus HS, Ackerstaff R, Babikian V, et al. Intercenter agreement in reading Doppler embolic signals: A multicenter international study. Stroke 1997; 28: 1307-1310.
10. Verwey NA, van der Flier WM, Blennow K, et al. A worldwide multicentre comparison of assays for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Clin Biochem 2009; 46: 235-240.
11. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, et al. Lessons from multicenter studies on CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Int J Alzheimer's Dis 2010:. Article ID: 610613.
12. Dargaud Y, Wolberg AS, Luddington R, et al. Evaluation of a standardized protocol for thrombin generation measurement using the calibrated automated thrombogram: An international multicentre study. Thromb Res 2012; 130: 929-934.
13. Pagani E, Hirsch JG, Pouwels PJW, et al. Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisition. J Magn Res Imag 2010; 31: 1458-1468.
14. Jarman B, Gault S, Alves B, et al. Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. BMJ 1999; 318: 1515-1520.
15. Rubner Y, Tomasi C, Guibas L,. The earth mover's distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int J Computer Vision 2000; 40: 99-121.
16. Endres DM, Schindelin JE,. A new metric for probability distributions. IEEE Trans Information Theory 2003; 49: 1858-1860.
17. Lin J,. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans Information Theory 1991; 37: 145-151.
18. Parks HR, Wills DC,. An elementary calculation of the dihedral angle of the regular n-simplex. Am Math Monthly 2002; 109: 756-758.
19. Parzen E,. On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Ann Math Stat 1962; 33: 1065-1076.
20. Bowman AW, Azzalini A,. Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with S-plus illustrations (Oxford Statistical Science Series), New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 1997.
21. Tenenbaum JB, de Silva V, Langford JC,. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 2000; 290: 2319-2323.
22. Hershey JR and Olsen PA. Approximating the Kullback Leibler divergence between Gaussian mixture models. In: Acoustics, speech and signal processing, Honolulu, HI: IEEE, 2007. ICASSP 2007. IEEE International Conference on. vol. 4, 2007, pp. 317-320.
23. Amari SI and Nagaoka H. Methods of information geometry (translations of mathematical monographs). American Mathematical Society, Oxford University Press, 2007.
24. Torgerson W,. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 1952; 17: 401-419.
25. Borg I and Groenen PJF. Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. Springer, New York, USA: 2010.
26. Kruskal JB,. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964; 29: 1-27.
27. De Leeuw J. Fitting distances by least squares. Tech Rep No 130, Interdivisional Program in Statistics, UCLA, California, USA, 1993.
28. Whitney H,. Differentiable manifolds. Ann Math 1940; 41: 645-680.
29. Wong PC, Foote H, Leung R, et al. Data signatures and visualization of scientific data sets. Comput Graphics Appl 2000; 20: 12-15.
30. Ihler A and Mandel M. Kernel density estimation toolbox for MATLAB, http://www.ics.uci.edu/ ihler/code/kde.html (accessed 6 May 2014).
31. Silverman BW,. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, New York, USA: Chapman & Hall, 1986.
32. Carvalho ARF, Tavares JMRS, Principe JC,. A novel nonparametric distance estimator for densities with error bounds. Entropy 2013; 15: 1609-1623.
33. Shimazaki H, Shinomoto S,. A method for selecting the bin size of a time histogram. Neural Comput 2007; 19: 1503-1527.
34. Weber GM,. Federated queries of clinical data repositories: The sum of the parts does not equal the whole. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20: e155-e161.
35. Jayram TS. Hellinger strikes back: A note on the multi-party information complexity of AND. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop and 13th International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX '09 / RANDOM '09, 2009, pp. 562-573. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
36. Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P,. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intel 2013; 35: 1798-1828.
37. Brazdil PB, ed. Metalearning: Applications to data mining. Cognitive technologies. Berlin: Springer, 2009.