Revisionary taxonomy in a changing e-landscape

Tijdschrift voor Entomologie

Volumn 150, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 305-317

  Scoble, Malcolm J ^a   Clark, Ben R ^b   Godfray, H Charles J ^b   Kitching, Ian J ^a   Mayo, Simon J ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008683502     PISSN: 00407496     EISSN: 22119434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/22119434-900000232     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Arms, W.Y., 2002. What are the alternatives to peer review? - The Journal of Electronic Publishing 8(1). http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/08-01/arms.html
2. Bowker, G.C., 2000. Biodiversity Datadiversity. - Social Studies of Science 30: 643-683. DOI: 10.1177/030631200030005001.
3. Butler, D., 2006. Mashups mix data into global service. - Nature 439: 6-7.
4. Dayrat, B., 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407-415.
5. Esselstyn, J.A., 2007. Should universal guidelines be applied to taxonomic research? - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90: 761-764.
6. Godfray, H.C.J., 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. - Nature 417: 17-19.
7. Godfray, H.C.J. & S. Knapp (Eds), 2004. Taxonomy for the twenty-first century. - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 359.
8. Godfray, H.C.J., B.R. Clark, I.J. Kitching, S.J. Mayo & M.J. Scoble, In press. The web and the structure of taxonomy. - Systematic Biology.
9. Hine, C., 2003. Systematics as cyberscience: the role of ICTs in the working practices of taxonomy. - Paper presented at the Oxford Internet Institute "Information, Communication and Society" symposium, 17-20 September 2003, University of Oxford, UK, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/pdfs/hine-oii.pdf
10. ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature], 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Fourth Edition). -[http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp]
11. Kitching, I.J. & J.-M. Cadiou, 2000. Hawkmoths of the world: an annotated and illustrated revisionary checklist. - The Natural History Museum, London & Cornell University Press, New York.
12. Linnaeus, C., 1753. Species Plantarum. - Stockholm.
13. Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Naturae, 10th Edn. - Holmiae.
14. Merali, Z. & J. Giles, 2005. Databases in peril. - Nature 435: 1010-1011.
15. Microsoft, 2006. Towards 2020 Science. - Microsoft Corporation, 82 pp. (http://research.microsoft.com/towards2020science/background-overview.htm)
16. Rothschild, L. W. & K. Jordan, 1903. A revision of the lepidopterous family Sphingidae. - Novitates Zoologicae 9: Suppl. 1-972.
17. Scoble, M.J., 2002. Unitary or unified taxonomy? In H.C.J. Godfray & S. Knapp Eds.), Taxonomy for the twenty-first century. - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 359: 699-710.
18. Scoble, M.J., In press. Networks and their role in e-taxonomy. - In Q.D. Wheeler (Ed.), The New Taxonomy. Systematics Association Special Volume Series
19. White, R., F. Bisby, N. Caithness, T. Sutton, P. Brewer, P. Williams, A. Culham, M. Scoble, A. Jones, W. Gray, N. Fiddian, N. Pittas, X. Xu, O. Bromley, P. Valdez, 2003. The Biodiversity World environment as an extensible virtual laboratory for analysing biodiversity patterns. - In: S.J. Cox (Ed.), Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, UK, EPSRC: 341-344.