In vitro biological responses to nanofibrillated cellulose by human dermal, lung and immune cells: Surface chemistry aspect

Particle and Fibre Toxicology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Lopes, Viviana R ^a   Sanchez Martinez, Carla ^b   Strømme, Maria ^a   Ferraz, Natalia ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cytotoxicity; Inflammation; Nanocellulose; Surface chemistry

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYL GROUP; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMETHYLAMMONIUM GROUP; INTERLEUKIN 1BETA; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; NANOMATERIAL; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; NANOFIBER;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; LUNG ALVEOLUS CELL; MACROPHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN FIBROBLAST; SURFACE AREA; SUSPENSION; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CELL LINE; CELLULOSE; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; L-LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; MACROPHAGES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOFIBERS; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES;

EID: 85008640147     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17438977     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12989-016-0182-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A. Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(2):612-26.
2. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, et al. Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci. 2010;45:1.
3. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:7.
4. Dufresne A. Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today. 2013;16(6):220-7.
5. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, et al. Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature-Based Materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50:24.
6. Johansson C, Bras J, Mondragon I, Nechita P. Renewable fibers and bio-based materials for packaging applications-a review of recent developments. Bioresources. 2012;7:2.
7. Jorfi M, Foster EJ. Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2015;132:14.
8. Shatkin JA, Kim B. Cellulose nanomaterials: life cycle risk assessment, and environmental health and safety roadmap. Environ Sci: Nano. 2015;2:5.
9. Siró I, Plackett D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose. 2010;17:3.
10. Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J. 2014;59.
11. Lindström T, Aulin C, Naderi A, Ankerfors M. Microfibrillated Cellulose. John Wiley & Sons. 2014. p. 1.
12. Alexandrescu L, Syverud K, Gatti A, Chinga-Carrasco G. Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose. 2013;20:4.
13. Čolić M, Mihajlović D, Mathew A, Naseri N, Kokol V. Cytocompatibility and immunomodulatory properties of wood based nanofibrillated cellulose. Cellulose. 2014;22:1.
14. Pitkänen M, Kangas H, Laitinen O, Sneck A, Lahtinen P, Peresin MS, et al. Characteristics and safety of nano-sized cellulose fibrils. Cellulose. 2014;21:6.
15. Vartiainen J, Pöhler T, Sirola K, Pylkkänen L, Alenius H, Hokkinen J, et al. Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose. 2011;18:3.
16. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J. Microfibrillated cellulose - Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90:2.
17. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, et al. Enzymatic Hydrolysis Combined with Mechanical Shearing and High-Pressure Homogenization for Nanoscale Cellulose Fibrils and Strong Gels. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:6.
18. Hua K, Carlsson DO, Alander E, Lindstrom T, Stromme M, Mihranyan A, et al. Translational study between structure and biological response of nanocellulose from wood and green algae. RSC Adv. 2014;4:6.
19. Usov I, Nystrom G, Adamcik J, Handschin S, Schutz C, Fall A, et al. Understanding nanocellulose chirality and structure-properties relationship at the single fibril level. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7564.
20. White B, Banerjee S, O'Brien S, Turro NJ, Herman IP. Zeta-potential measurements of surfactant-wrapped individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:37.
21. Park EK, Jung HS, Yang HI, Yoo MC, Kim C, Kim KS. Optimized THP-1 differentiation is required for the detection of responses to weak stimuli. Inflamm Res. 2007;56:1.
22. Stone V, Johnston H, Schins RPF. Development of in vitro systems for nanotoxicology: methodological considerations. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39:7.
23. Duff GW, Atkins E. The inhibitory effect of polymyxin B on endotoxin-induced endogenous pyrogen production. J Immunol Methods. 1982;52:3.
24. Hua K, Ålander E, Lindström T, Mihranyan A, Strømme M, Ferraz N. Surface Chemistry of Nanocellulose Fibers Directs Monocyte/Macrophage Response. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:9.
25. Riddick T. Control of colloid stability through zeta potential: with a closing chapter on its relationship to cardiovascular disease. vol. 1. New York: Livingston Publishing Company; 1968.
26. Lesniak A, Salvati A, Santos-Martinez MJ. Nanoparticle adhesion to the cell membrane and its effect on nanoparticle uptake efficiency. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:4.
27. Forest V, Cottier M, Pourchez J. Electrostatic interactions favor the binding of positive nanoparticles on cells: A reductive theory. Nano Today. 2015;10(6):677-80.
28. Tomic S, Kokol V, Mihajlovic D, Mircic A, Colic M. Native cellulose nanofibrills induce immune tolerance in vitro by acting on dendritic cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31618.
29. Fubini B, Ghiazza M, Fenoglio I. Physico-chemical features of engineered nanoparticles relevant to their toxicity. Nanotoxicology. 2010;4:347-63.
30. Bhattacharya M, Malinen MM, Lauren P, Lou Y-R, Kuisma SW, Kanninen L, et al. Nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel promotes three-dimensional liver cell culture. J Control Release. 2012;164:3.
31. Kollar P, Závalová V, Hošek J, Havelka P, Sopuch T, Karpíšek M, et al. Cytotoxicity and effects on inflammatory response of modified types of cellulose in macrophage-like THP-1 cells. Int J Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:8.
32. Lou Y-R, Kanninen L, Kuisma T, Niklander J, Noon LA, Burks D, et al. The Use of Nanofibrillar Cellulose Hydrogel As a Flexible Three-Dimensional Model to Culture Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:4.
33. Zander NE, Dong H, Steele J, Grant JT. Metal cation cross-linked nanocellulose hydrogels as tissue engineering substrates. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2014;6:21.
34. Donaldson K, Poland CA, Murphy FA, MacFarlane M, Chernova T, Schinwald A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes and asbestos - Similarities and differences. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:15.
35. Dinarello CA. Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000;118:2.
36. Catalan J, Rydman E, Aimonen K, Hannukainen KS, Suhonen S, Vanhala E, et al. Genotoxic and inflammatory effects of nanofibrillated cellulose in murine lungs. Mutagenesis. 2016. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gew035.
37. Donaldson K, Tran LC. Inflammation caused by particles and fibers. Inhal Toxicol. 2002;14:1.
38. Murray AR, Kisin ER, Tkach AV, Yanamala N, Mercer R, Young SH, et al. Factoring-in agglomeration of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers for better prediction of their toxicity versus asbestos. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012;9:10.
39. Mutlu GM, Budinger GR, Green AA, Urich D, Soberanes S, Chiarella SE, et al. Biocompatible nanoscale dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes minimizes in vivo pulmonary toxicity. Nano Lett. 2010;10:5.
40. Xia T, Hamilton RF, Bonner JC, Crandall ED, Elder A, Fazlollahi F, et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:6.