Video-assisted navigation for adjustment of image-guidance accuracy to slight brain shift

Operative Neurosurgery

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 504-511

  Kantelhardt, Sven R ^a   Gutenberg, Angelika ^a   Neulen, Axel ^a   Keric, Naureen ^a   Renovanz, Mirjam ^a   Giese, Alf ^a   Schulder, Michael ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Brain shift adjustment; Image guidance; Microscope image injection; Registration accuracy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRANIOTOMY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROSCOPE IMAGE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONAVIGATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; SURGICAL MICROSCOPE; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 85008330518     PISSN: 23324252     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000921     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Zamorano LJ, Nolte L, Kadi AM, Jiang Z. Interactive intraoperative localization using an infrared-based system. Neurol Res. 1993;15(5):290-298.
2. Gleason PL, Kikinis R, Altobelli D, et al. Video registration virtual reality for nonlinkage stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;63(1-4):139-143.
3. Chen JC, Moffitt K, Levy ML. Head-mounted display system for microneurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;68(1-4 pt 1):25-32.
4. Edwards PJ, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL, et al. Augmentation of reality using an operating microscope for otolaryngology and neurosurgical guidance. J Image Guid Surg. 1995;1(3):172-178.
5. Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral aneurysms: a technical report. Neurosurgery. 2014;10(suppl 2):252-261.
6. Willems PW, van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJ. Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumors. J Neurol. 2006;253(9): 1123-1136.
7. Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Hassfeld S, et al. Neuronavigation - first experiences with three different commercially available systems. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1998;59(1): 14-22.
8. Paraskevopoulos D, Unterberg A, Metzner R, et al. Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors. Neurosurg Rev. 2010;34(2):217-228.
9. Muacevic A, Uhl E, Steiger HJ, Reulen HJ. Accuracy and clinical applicability of a passive marker based frameless neuronavigation system. J Clin Neurosci. 2000;7 (5):414-418.
10. Gumprecht HK, Widenka DC, Lumenta CB. BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(1):97-104.
11. Stieglitz LH, Fichtner J, Andres R, et al. The silent loss of neuronavigation accuracy: a systematic retrospective analysis of factors influencing the mismatch of frameless stereotactic systems in cranial neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(5):796-807.
12. Mohammadi AM, Sullivan TB, Barnett GH, et al. Use of high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to enhance the extent of resection of enhancing and nonenhancing gliomas. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(4):339-348.
13. Kantelhardt SR, Finke M, Schweikard A, Giese A. Evaluation of a completely robotized neurosurgical operating microscope. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(suppl 1):19-26.